Advertisement

Competition and Adaptation Among Diploid and Polyploid Clones of Unisexual Fishes

  • R. Jack Schultz
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings in Life Sciences book series (LIFE SCIENCES)

Abstract

During the development of population biology as a science, genetic variation has been regarded as adaptive, maladaptive, or simply waiting to be drawn upon during times of environmental change. Attempts to evaluate the importance of variation, either in the production of heterosis or as adaptive polymorphisms in homogeneous, heterogeneous, or fluctuating environments, are generally confounded by two major problems: (1) identifying the forces of selection that are operational and (2) determining the phenotype (and associated genotype) upon which selection operates. In sexually reproducing organisms the effects of selection are continually obscured by recombination. Asexual organisms provide a simpler system for investigating the adaptive significance of genetic variation. Here, the genetic variation of a population is contained in the form of multiple genetic clones that, in the absence of recombination, magnify the effects of selection in successive generations.

Keywords

Parental Species Brood Size Crowded Condition Large Brood Growth Rate Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angus, R. A., Schultz, R. J.: Clonal diversity in the unisexual fish Poeciliopsis monachalucida: a tissue graft analysis. Evolution 33, 27–40 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bulger, A. J., Schultz, R. J.: Heterosis and interclonal variation in thermal tolerance in unisexual fishes. Evolution 33, 848–859 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cimino, M. C.: Meiosis in triploid all-female fish Poeciliopsis (Poeciliidae). Science 175, 1484–1486 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. McKay, F. E.: Behavioral aspects of population dynamics in unisexual-bisexual Poeciliopsis (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Ecology 52, 778–790 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Moore, W. S.: Components of fitness in the unisexual fish Poeciliopsis monachaoccidentalis. Evolution 30, 564–578 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moore, W. S.: A histocompatability analysis of inheritance in the unisexual fish Poeciliopsis 2 monacha-lucida. Copeia 1977, 213–223 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Schultz, R. J.: Reproductive mechanisms of unisexual and bisexual strains of the viviparous fish Poeciliopsis. Evolution 15, 302–325 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schultz, R. J.: Hybridization experiments with an all-female fish of the genus Poeciliopsis. Biol. Bull. 130, 415–429 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schultz, R. J.: Gynogenesis and triploidy in the viviparous fish Poeciliopsis. Science 157, 1564–1567 (1967).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schultz, R. J.: Hybridization, unisexuality and polyploidy in the teleost Poeciliopsis (Poeciliidae) and other vertebrates. Am. Nat. 103, 613–619 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schultz, R. J.: Special adaptive problems associated with unisexual fishes. Am. Zool. 11, 351–360 (1971).Google Scholar
  12. Schultz, R. J.: Unisexual fish: Laboratory synthesis of a “species.” Science 179, 180–181 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schultz, R. J.: Evolution and ecology of unisexual fishes. In: Evolutionary Biology. Hecht, M. K., Steere, W. C., Wallace, B. (eds.). New York: Plenum Press, 1977, pp. 277–331.Google Scholar
  14. Thibault, R. E.: Ecological and evolutionary relationships among diploid and triploid unisexual fishes associated with the bisexual species, Poeciliopsis lucida (Cyprinidontiformes: Poeciliidae). Evolution 32, 613–623 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thibault, R. E., Schultz, R. J.: Reproductive adaptations among viviparous fishes (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae). Evolution 32, 320–333 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Turner, C. L.: Pseudoamnion, pseudochorion and follicular pseudoplacenta in poeciliid fishes. J. Morphol. 67, 58–89 (1940a).Google Scholar
  17. Turner, C. L.: Superfetation in viviparous cyprinodont fishes. Copeia 1940, 88–91 (1940b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vrijenhoek, R. C.: Genetic relationships of unisexual-hybrid fishes to their progenitors using lactate dehydrogenase isozymes as gene markers (Poeciliopsis, Poecilüdae). Am. Nat. 106, 754–766 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vrijenhoek, R. C.: Coexistence of clones in a heterogeneous environment. Science 199, 549–552 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vrijenhoek, R. C., Angus, R. A., Schultz, R. J.: Variation and clonal structure in a unisexual fish. Am. Nat. 112, 41–55 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Jack Schultz
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological Sciences GroupUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations