Phenotypic and Genetic Covariance Structure in Milkweed Bug Life History Traits

  • Joseph P. Hegmann
  • Hugh Dingle
Part of the Proceedings in Life Sciences book series (LIFE SCIENCES)


Variation in life history characteristics is critical for any species because it influences the timing and extent of population growth. When the variability is caused by gene differences among individuals, changes in population growth differ among genotypes. Gene frequencies will change at loci with effects on life history traits, and selection and microevolution of life history traits should occur. However, if many life history characteristics vary among individuals, there may be pairwise covariance caused, in part, by genetic linkage disequilibrium or by pleiotropy. Change caused by selection acting on additive genetic variance for any single character will be accompanied by change in other genetically correlated characters. Darwin (1859; see Darwin 1958) commented on this situation in reference to domestication and artificial selection, which he said “will almost certainly modify unintentionally other parts of the structure, owing to the mysterious laws of correlation” (p. 35). The importance of genetic correlations in the context of life history variables and natural selection is the primary motivation for the work reported here.


Life History Genetic Correlation Life History Trait Clutch Size Female Offspring 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bell, G.: The costs of reproduction and their consequences. Am. Nat. 116, 45–76 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blakley, N., Goodner, S. R.: Size-dependent timing of metamorphosis in milkweed bugs (Oncopeltus)and its life history implications. Biol. Bull. 155, 499–510 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldwell, R. L., Hegmann, J. P.: Heritability of flight duration in the milkweed bug Lygaeus kalmii. Nature (London) 223, 91–92 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darwin, C. The Origin of Species by Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. New York: The New American Library of World Literature, 1958. (Originally published 1859 ).Google Scholar
  5. Dickerson, G. E.: Genetic slippage in response to selection for multiple objectives. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 20, 213–224 (1955).Google Scholar
  6. Dickerson, G. E.: Techniques for research in quantitative animal genetics. In: Techniques and Procedures in Animal Production Research. American Society of Animal Production, 1959, pp. 56–105.Google Scholar
  7. Dingle, H.: Life history and population consequences of density, photoperiod, and temperature in a migrant insect, the milkweed bug Oncopeltus. Am. Nat. 103, 149–163 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dingle, H.: Migration and diapause in tropical, temperate, and island milkweed bugs. In: Evolution of Insect Migration and Diapause. Dingle, H. (ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978, pp. 254–276.Google Scholar
  9. Dingle, H., Alden, B. M., Blakley, N. R., Kopec, D., Miller, E. R.: Variation in photo-periodic response within and among species of milkweed bugs (Oncopeltus). Evolution 34, 356–370 (1980a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dingle, H., Blakley, N. R., Miller, E. R.: Variation in body size and flight performance in milkweed bugs (Oncopeltus). Evolution 34, 371–385 (1980b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dingle, H., Brown, C. K., Hegmann, J. P.: The nature of genetic variance influencing photoperiodic diapause in a migrant insect, Oncopeltus fascia tus. Am. Nat. 111, 1047–1059 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falconer, D. S.: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1960.Google Scholar
  13. Finn, J. P.: A General Model for Multivariate Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1974.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, R. A.: The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Now York: Dover, 1958.Google Scholar
  15. Hairston, N. G., Tinkle, D. W., Wilbur, H. M.: Natural selection and the parameters of population growth. J. Wildlife Mgmt. 34, 681–690 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hegmann, J. P., Possidente, B.: Estimating genetic correlations from inbred stains. Behay. Genet. 11, 103–113 (1981).Google Scholar
  17. Istock, C. A.: Fitness variation in a natural population. In: Evolution of Insect Migration and Diapause. Dingle, H. (ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978, pp. 171–190.Google Scholar
  18. Lande, R.: Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33, 402–416 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lande, R.: Genetic variation and phenotypic evolution during allopatric speciation. Am. Nat. 116, 463–479 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McLaren, I. A.: Inheritance of demographic and production parameters in the marine copepod Eurytemora herdmani. Biol. Bull. 151, 200–213 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Osborne, R., Patterson, W. S. B.: On the sampling variance of heritability estimates derived from variance analysis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, B Ser. 64, 456–461 (1952).Google Scholar
  22. Robertson, A.: Selection in animals: Synthesis. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 20, 225–229 (1955).Google Scholar
  23. Roberts, R. C.: Some evolutionary implications of behavior. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 9: 419–435 (1967).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph P. Hegmann
  • Hugh Dingle
    • 1
  1. 1.Program in Evolutionary Ecology and Behavior Department of ZoologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations