A comparison of the response to psychoanalytic and client-centered psychotherapy

  • Rosalind Dymond Cartwright
Part of the The Century Psychology Series book series (TCPS)


The psychotherapy game can be thought of as a team sport involving two players, one a professional, the other an amateur. The aim of the game is to resolve the problems of the amateur according to the rules of the professional, rules which the amateur must learn as the game progresses. Research in this field has concentrated largely on attempts to discover the influence of each of these elements, both singly and in their interactions, on the success of the game, or the resolution of the problems.


Matched Patient Male Therapist Treatment Style Analytic Therapy Bale Category 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bales, R. F. Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of smallgroups. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1950Google Scholar
  2. Barron, F. An ego-strength scale which predicts response to psychotherapy. In G. S. Welsh and W. F. Dahlstrom (Eds.), Basic readings on the MMPIin psychology and medicine. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  3. Betz, Barbaba I., and Whitehorn, J. C. The relationship of the therapist to the outcome of therapy in schizophrenia. APA psychiatric research reports, 5, 1956.Google Scholar
  4. Cartwright, Rosalind D. Predicting response to client-centered therapy with the Rorschach PR scale. J. counsel. Psychol., 5, 1958.Google Scholar
  5. Cartwright, Rosalind D., and Lerner, Barbara. Empathy, need to change, and improvement with psychotherapy. J. consult. Psychol., 27, 1963.Google Scholar
  6. Freud, Anna. The ego and the mechanisms of defense. New York: International Universities, 1946.Google Scholar
  7. Hollingshead, A., and Redlich, F. C. Social class and mental illness, New York: Wiley, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirtner, W. L., and Cartwright, D. S. Success and failure in client-centered therapy as a function of initial in-therapy behavior. J. consult. Psychol., 22, 1958.Google Scholar
  9. McNair, D. M., Callahan, D. M., and Lorr, M. Therapist “type” and patient response to psychotherapy. J. consult. Psychol., 26, 1962.Google Scholar
  10. Miller, A., Isaacs, K., and Haggard, E. On the nature of the observing function of the ego. Brit. J. med. Psychol. In press.Google Scholar
  11. Noble, N., Ohlsen, M., and Proff, F. A method for the quantification of psychotherapeutic interaction in counseling groups. J. counsel. Psychol., 8, 1961.Google Scholar
  12. Rogers, C., and Rablen, R. A scale of process in psychotherapy. Mimeographed Manual, Univ. of Wisconsin, 1958.Google Scholar
  13. Sterba, R. The fate of the ego in analytic therapy. Int. J. Psychoanal., 15, 1934.Google Scholar
  14. Tomlinson, T. M., and Hart, J. T. Jr. A validation of the process scale. J. consult. Psychol., 26, 1962.Google Scholar
  15. Walker, A., Rablen, R., and Rogers, C. R. Development of a scale to measure process change in psychotherapy. J. clin. Psychol., 1, 1960.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Meredith Publishing Company 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosalind Dymond Cartwright

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations