Advertisement

Evaluative research design: a social casework illustration

  • James L. Breedlove
  • Merton S. Krause
Part of the The Century Psychology Series book series (TCPS)

Abstract

Clinicians within the professions of psychology, social work, and psychiatry increasingly have demonstrated interest in the findings of research studies to supplement their clinical knowledge. The clinician’s interest in organized research studies stems primarily from the recognition that demonstrable advances in therapeutic efficacy are dependent upon attaining greater precision in estimating the effects of treatment. Although the observations of the clinician from his practice may provide the bases for hypotheses, his day-to-day practice does not provide the necessary controls for testing the limits of such hypotheses (GAP Report No. 42, 1959; Rychlak, 1959). In most instances, only the organized study which introduces systematic controls on observations of clinical phenomena can demonstrate the utility of the clinician’s hypotheses. This is true, of course, in areas other than psychotherapy, casework, and counseling (e.g., see Modell, 1963).

Keywords

Systematic Error Random Assignment Agency Administrator Evaluative Study Affect Treatment Outcome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, M. B., Haberman, P., and Alksne, H. Outcome of alcoholic marriages: endurance, termination, or recovery. Quart. J. Stud. Alcohol., 23: 610–623, 1962.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blenkner, Margaret. Predictive factors in the initial interview in family casework. Soc. Serv. Rev., 28: 65–73, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blenkner, Margaret. Control groups and the placebo effect. Social Work, 7: 52–58, 1962.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. M., Rice, L. N., and Wagstaff, A. K. On the naturalistic definition of variables: An analogue of clinical analysis. In H.H. Strupp and L. Luborsky (Eds.), Research in Psychotherapy. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1962.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, D. Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychol. Bull., 54: 297–312, 1957.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cartwright, D. S. Psychotherapy: not the placebo effect. Univ. of Chicago Counseling Center Discussion Papers. 2 (Whole No. 29), 1956.Google Scholar
  7. Cartwright, D. S., Kirtner, W. L., and Fiske, D. W. Method factors in changes associated with psychotherapy. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 66: 164–175, 1963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox, D. R. Planning of experiments. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, A. L., and Cronbach, L. J. Experimental design for research in psychotherapy. J. clin. Psychol., 8: 51–59, 1952.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fairweather, G. W., Simon, R., Gebhard, M. E., Weingarten, E., Holland, J. L., Sanders, R., Stone, G. B., and Reahl, J. E. Relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic programs: a multicriteria comparison of four programs for three different patient groups. Psychol. Monogr., 74: (Whole No. 492), 1960.Google Scholar
  11. Finney, D. J. An introduction to the theory of experimental design. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  12. Fiske, D. W., and Butler, J. M. The experimental conditions for measuring individual differences. Educ. psychol. Measmt., 23: 249–266, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frank, J. D. Problems of controls in psychotherapy as exemplified by the psychotherapy research project of the Phipps Psychiatric Clinic. In E. H. Rubinstein and M. B. Parloff (Eds.), Research in psychotherapy. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association, 1959.Google Scholar
  14. Glatt, M. M. Treatment results in an English mental hospital alcoholic unit. Acta Psychiat. Scand., 37: 143–168, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldstein, A. Therapist-patient expectancies in psychotherapy. New York: Macmillan, 1962.Google Scholar
  16. Goulden, C. Methods of Statistical Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1952.Google Scholar
  17. Hathaway, S. R. Some considerations relative to nondirective psychotherapy as counseling. J. clin. Psychol., 4: 226–231, 1948.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., and Sheffield, F. D. Experiments on mass communication. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  19. Hunt, J. McV., Ewing, T. N., LaForge, R., and Gilbert, W. M. An integrated approach to research on therapeutic counseling with samples of results. J. counsel. Psychol., 6: 46–54, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hyman, H. H., Cobb, W. J., Feldman, J. J., Hart, C. W., and Stember, C. H. Interviewing in social research. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  21. Imber, S. D., Frank, J. D., Nash, E. H., Stone, A. R., and Gliedman, L. H. Improvement and amount of therapeutic contact: an alternative to the use of no-treatment controls in psychotherapy. J. consult. Psychol., 21: 309–315, 1957.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson, Joan. The adjustment of the family to alcoholism. Marriage and family living, 18: 361–369, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jahoda, Marie. Current concepts of positive mental health. New York: Basic Books, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jellinek, E. M. The disease concept of alcoholism. New Haven, Conn.: Hill-house Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  25. Klerman, G. Assessing the influence of the hospital milieu upon the effectiveness of psychiatric drug therapy: problems of conceptualization and re­search methodology. J. new. ment. Dis., 137: 143–154, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kreitman, N. The reliability of psychiatric diagnosis. J. ment. Sci., 107: 876–886, 1961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lana, R. E. Pretest-treatment interaction effects in attitudinal studies. Psychol. Bull., 56: 293–300, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lasky, J. The problem of sample attrition in controlled treatment trials. J.nerv. ment. Dis., 135: 332–337, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levinger, G. Continuance in casework and other helping relationships: a review of current research. Social Work, 5: 40–51, 1960.Google Scholar
  30. Luborsky, L., Fabian, Michalina, Hall, B. H., Ticho, E., and Ticho, Gertrude R. Treatment variables. Bull. Menninger Clin., 22: 126–147, 1958.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Maslow, A. H. Problem-centering vs. means-centering in science. Phil. of Sci., 13: 326–331, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miles, H. H., Barrabee, E. L., and Finesinger, J. E. Evaluation of psychotherapy: with a follow-up study of 62 cases of anxiety neurosis. Psychosom. Med., 13: 83–105, 1951.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Modell, W. Hazards of new drugs. Sci., 139: 1180–1185, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Orne, M. T. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Amer. Psychologist, 17: 776–783, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parloff, M. B., Kelman, H. C., and Frank, J. D. Comfort, effectiveness, and self-awareness as criteria of improvement in psychotherapy. Amer. J. Psychiat., 3: 343–351, 1954.Google Scholar
  36. Rosenthal, R., Persinger, G. W., Vikan-Kline, Linda L., and Mabray, R. C. The role of the research assistant in the mediation of experimenter bias. J. Pers., 31: 313–335, 1963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rubinstein, E. A., and Lorr, M. A comparison of terminators and remainers in out-patient psychotherapy. J. clin. Psychol., 12: 345–349, 1956.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rychlak, J. F. Clinical psychology and the nature of evidence. Amer. Psychologist, 14: 642–648, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sargent, Helen. Intrapsychic change: methodological problems in psychotherapy research. Psychiat., 24: 93–108, 1961.Google Scholar
  40. Shyne, Ann. What research tells us about short-term cases in family agencies. Soc. Casewk., 38: 223–231, 1957.Google Scholar
  41. Siegal, R., and Rosen, I. Character style and anxiety tolerance: a study in intrapsychic change. In H. H. Strupp and L. Luborsky (Eds.), Besearch in Psychotherapy, Vol. II. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1962. Pp. 206–217.Google Scholar
  42. Some observations on controls in psychiatric research, Report No. 42. New York: Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, 1959.Google Scholar
  43. Stephan, F. F., and McCarthy, P. J. Sampling opinions. New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
  44. Strupp, H. H. Patient-doctor relationships: The psychotherapist in the therapeutic process. In A. J. Bachrach (Ed.) Experimental Foundations of clinical psychology. New York: Basic Books, 1962.Google Scholar
  45. Thomas, E. J. Field experiments and demonstrations. In Norman Polansky (Ed.), Social work research. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1960. Pp. 273–297.Google Scholar
  46. Voth, H. M., Modlin, H. C., and Orth, H. H. Situational variables in the assessment of psychotherapeutic results. Bull. Menninger Clin., 25: 75–81, 1962.Google Scholar
  47. Weber, Ruth. Children’s verbal accessibility as a predictor of treatment outcome. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Reserve University, 1963.Google Scholar
  48. Wolf, S. Effects of suggestion and conditioning on the action of chemical agents in human subjects. J. Clin. Invest., 29: 100–109, 1950.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zigler, E., and Phillips, L. Social competence and outcome in psychiatric disorder. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 63: 264–271, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Meredith Publishing Company 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • James L. Breedlove
  • Merton S. Krause

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations