Toward the longitudinal study of the psychotherapeutic process

  • Hans H. Strupp
  • J. B. Chassan
  • John A. Ewing
Part of the The Century Psychology Series book series (TCPS)


Accurate description is the first requirement in any science: without it, measurement and prediction are an impossibility. One of the often-repeated criticisms of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy has been aimed at this alleged deficiency, and, one must admit, with considerable justification. Aside from quantitative measurement and prediction which may be viewed as later and more refined developments, it should be possible, minimally, to agree on observable phenomena in the psychotherapeutic situation. Yet, when serious attempts have been made to study this problem, the results have usually been disappointing. The extent of this disillusionment is difficult to gauge because many efforts in this direction which were considered abortive by the investigators have never been published. In the absence of such reports it is difficult to assess whether the difficulties are indeed insuperable. However, if the direction of developments in psychotherapy is toward greater precision, and if psychotherapy aspires to the status of a science, the difficulties must be faced and resolved. The failures which have been experienced are perhaps largely due to faulty methodologies rather than to an inherent impossibility of describing adequately the phenomena of psychotherapy.


Positive Attitude Negative Attitude Independent Observer Technique Variable Rater Agreement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Auerbach, A. H. An application of Strupp’s method of content analysis to psychotherapy. Psychiat., 26: 137, 1963.Google Scholar
  2. Auld, Jr., F., and Murray, E. J. Content-analysis studies of psychotherapy. Psychol. Bull., 52: 377, 1955.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bales, R. F. Interaction process analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1950.Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett, M. S. Some aspects of the time-correlation problem in regard to tests of significance. J. Royal Statist. Soc., 98: 536, 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, M. S. On the theoretical specification of sampling properties of auto-correlated time series. Suppl. J. Royal Statist. Soc., 8: 27, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellak, L., and Smith, M. B. An experimental exploration of the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Quart., 25: 385, 1956.Google Scholar
  7. Chassan, J. B. Probability processes in psychoanalytic psychiatry. In J. Scher (Ed.), Theories of the Mind. New York: Free Press, 1962. Pp. 598–618.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, R. A., and Cohen, M. B. Research in psychotherapy: a preliminary report. Psychiat., 24: 46, 1961.Google Scholar
  9. Dittes, J. E. Previous studies bearing on content analysis of psychotherapy. In J. Dollard and F. Auld Jr., Scoring human motives. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959. Pp. 325–351.Google Scholar
  10. Greenacre, P. The role of transference: practical considerations in relation to psychoanalytic therapy. J. Amer. Psychoanal Ass. 2: 671, 1954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haggard, E. A. Intraclass correlation and the analysis of variance. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1958.Google Scholar
  12. Holt, R. R. Clinical and Statistical prediction: a reformulation and some new data. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 56: 1, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Janis, I. L. The psychoanalytic interview as an observational method. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Assessment of human motives. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1958. Pp. 149–182.Google Scholar
  14. Marsden, G. Content-analysis studies of therapeutic interviews: 1954 to 1964. Psychol. Bull, 62: 298, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Quenouille, M. H. Associated measurements. London: Butterworth Scientific Publications, 1952, Chap. 11.Google Scholar
  16. Strupp, H. H. A multidimensional system for analyzing psychotherapeutic techniques. Psychiat., 20: 293, 1957. (a)Google Scholar
  17. Strupp, H. H. A multidimensional analysis of technique in brief psychotherapy. Psychiat., 20: 387, 1957. (b)Google Scholar
  18. Strupp, H. H. A multidimensional comparison of therapist activity in analytic and client-centered therapy. J. consult. Psychol., 21: 301, 1957. (c)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Strupp, H. H. The psychotherapist’s contribution to the treatment process. Behav. Sci., 3: 34, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Strupp, H. H. Patient-doctor relationships: Psychotherapist in the therapeutic process. In A. J. Bachrach (Ed.), Experimental foundations of clinical psychology. New York: Basic Books, 1962. Pp. 576–615.Google Scholar
  21. Strupp, H. H. A further study of psychiatrists’ responses in quasi-therapy situations. Behav. Sci., 10: 113, 1965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strupp, H. H., and Williams, J. V. Some determinants of clinical evaluations of different psychiatrists. A.M.A. Arch. gen. Psychiat., 2: 434, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tolman, R. S. Virtue rewarded and vice punished. Amer. Psychologist, 8: 721, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wallach, M. S., and Strupp, H. H. Psychotherapists’ clinical judgments and attitudes towards patients. J. consult. Psychol., 24: 316, 1960.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Meredith Publishing Company 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans H. Strupp
  • J. B. Chassan
  • John A. Ewing

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations