Some methods used in the study of affect in psychotherapy

  • Kenneth S. Isaacs
  • Ernest A. Haggard
Part of the The Century Psychology Series book series (TCPS)


The early psychoanalytic formulations were primarily in terms of affectivity. Catharsis is a prime example of just such a formulation (Freud, 1955). Later the major concern of the psychoanalytic formulations was in regard to other aspects of psychic life. The genetic, dynamic and structural viewpoints provided a focus which overshadowed interest in the affect theory. Further exploration of the place of affect in normal and abnormal development of personality was relegated to passing references in the literature on technique. Nevertheless, affect remained a central focus in psychic function, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. Brierly, in 1951, pointed out that patients always forced this on psychoanalysts. The appearance of essays on affect in recent years suggests some revival of primary interest in affective states and processes (e.g., de Saussure, 1950, 1959; Greenson, 1953; Lewin, 1950; Novey, 1959; and Rangell, 1955). Some recent papers from our own group may be added to the list (e.g., Alexander, 1960; Alexander and Isaacs, 1963; Isaacs, Alexander and Haggard, 1963; Alexander and Isaacs, 1964; and Isaacs and Alexander, in press).


Affective Attitude Affect Word Psychic Life Affect Theory Affective Capacity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, J. M. The psychology of bitterness. Int. J. Psychoanal., 41: 514, 1960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. M., and Isaacs, K. S. On seriousness and preconscious affective attitudes. Int. J. Psychoanal., 44: 23, 1963.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, J. M., and Isaacs, K. S. The function of affect. Brit. J. Med. Psychol. 37: 231, 1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brierly, Marjorie. Trends in psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth, 1951.Google Scholar
  5. Freud, S. Studies in hysteria. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. II, 1893–1895. London: Hogarth, 1955.Google Scholar
  6. Greenson, R. R. On boredom. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Ass., 1: 7, 1953.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haggard, E. A. Intraclass correlation and the analysis of variance. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1958.Google Scholar
  8. Isaacs, K. S. Relatability, a proposed construct and an approach to its validation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Chicago, 1956.Google Scholar
  9. Isaacs, K. S., and Alexander, J. M. Affect in ego development. In press.Google Scholar
  10. Isaacs, K. S., Alexander, J. M., and Haggard, E. A. Faith, trust, and gullibility. Int. J. Psychoanal., 44: 4, 1963.Google Scholar
  11. Lewin, B. The psychoanalysis of elation. New York: Norton, 1950.Google Scholar
  12. Miller, A. A., Isaacs, K. S., and Haggard, E. A. On the nature of the observing function of the ego. Brit. J. Med. Psychol. 1965.Google Scholar
  13. Novey, S. A clinical view of affect theory in psycho-analysis. Int. J. Psychoanal, 40: 94, 1959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rangell, L. On the psychoanalytic theory of anxiety: a statement of a unitary theory. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Ass., 3: 389, 1955.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogers, C. R., and Dymond, Rosalind F. (Eds.), Psychotherapy and personality change. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  16. de Saussure, R. Present trends in psychoanalysis. Congres Int. de Psychiatric Paris: Rapport, 5: 95, 1950.Google Scholar
  17. de Saussure, R. The metapsychology of pleasure. Int. J. Psychoanal., 40: 81, 1959.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Meredith Publishing Company 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth S. Isaacs
  • Ernest A. Haggard

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations