Advertisement

Linguistic techniques and the analysis of emotionality in interviews

  • Allen T. Dittmann
  • Lyman C. Wynne
Part of the The Century Psychology Series book series (TCPS)

Abstract

For many years clinicians and researchers alike have been searching for some way aside from content to conceptualize and measure the emotionality that is expressed in interviews. There is general agreement that while content, or what is talked about, is very important, and gives many clues to the inner life of patients, the manner of speech, or how things are talked about, enriches the communication immeasurably. Recently the field of linguistics has been seen by many workers to offer the hope of capturing the vocal aspects of communication. Many of the references to linguistics have been impressionistic and programmatic: investigators have been enjoined to study systematically the effects of “tone of voice” in communications. To date only one published research (McQuown, 1957)1 has used linguistic techniques in analyzing interview material. The study is a pioneering one, but does not attempt to evaluate the techniques in a systematic way.

Keywords

Emotional Expression Voice Quality Linguistic Analysis Primary Stress Radio Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J., and Weekland, J. Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behav, Sci., 1, 1956, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dibner, A. S. Ambiguity and anxiety. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 56, 1958, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. McQuown, N. A. Linguistic transcription and specification of psychiatric interview materials. Psychiatry, 20, 1957, 79–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mahl, G. F. Disturbances and silences in the patient’s speech in psychotherapy. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 53, 1956, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Pittenger, R. E., Hockett, C. F., and Danehy, J. J. The first 5 minutes: A sample of microscopic interview analysis. Ithaca, N.Y.: Paul Martineau, 1960.Google Scholar
  6. Pittenger, R. E. and Smith, H. L. A basis for some contributions of linguistics to psychiatry. Psychiatry, 20, 1957, 61–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ruesch, J. The tangential response. In P. H. Hoch and J. Zubin (Eds.), Psychopathology of communication. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1958. Pp. 37–48.Google Scholar
  8. Starkweather, J. A. The communication value of content-free speech. Amer. J. Psychol., 69, 1956, 121–123. (a)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Starkweather, J. A. Content-free speech as a source of information about the speaker. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol, 52, 1956, 394–402. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Trager, G. L. Paralanguage: A first approximation. Stud. Linguist., 13, 1958, 1–12.Google Scholar
  11. Trager, G. L., and Smith, H. L. An outline of English structure. Norman, Okla.: Battenberg Press, 1951.Google Scholar
  12. Wynne, L. C., Ryckoff, I. M., Day, J., and Hirsch, S. I. Pseudomutuality in the family relations of schizophrenics. Psychiatry, 21, 1958, 205–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Meredith Publishing Company 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allen T. Dittmann
  • Lyman C. Wynne

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations