Cocaine pp 115-134 | Cite as

Outpatient Treatment

  • Mark S. Gold
Part of the Drugs of Abuse book series (DOAC, volume 3)


The evaluation and initial treatment of cocaine-using patients is a complex, demanding, and sometimes confusing process. Thorough treatment requires the physician to integrate a range of medical, psychiatric, social, and drug-counseling services. Adding to the complexity is the need to address family issues and to anticipate the risk of relapse. Treatment can be expensive, but a recent study found that for every treatment dollar spent, $11.54 was saved in social costs (the costs to society from arrests, prosecution, theft, medical care, impaired job performance, and so on).1 Although currently the success rate of treatment for drug addiction is less than would be desired, new treatment strategies, including some pharmacological interventions, offer hope for improving the outcome.


Outpatient Treatment Cocaine Dependence National Household Survey Residential Treatment Program Inpatient Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Tabbush V. The effectiveness and efficiency of publicly funded drug abuse treatment and prevention programs in California: a benefit-cost analysis. UCLA Graduate School of Management, March 1986. As reported in “Treatment Works”; published by National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors; March 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grinspoon L, Bakalar JB. Cocaine. In: DuPont RL, Godstein A, O’Donnell J, eds. Handbook of Drug Abuse. Rockville Md: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1979.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The 1991 National Household Survey. Rockville, Md: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bowe OP, Sammons JH. The alcohol-abusing patient: a challenge to the profession. JAMA. 1988;260:2267–2270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walsh D, Chapman Hingson RW, Merrigan DM, et al. The impact of a physician’s warning on recovery after alcoholism treatment. JAMA 1992;267(5):663–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoffman NG. Treatment outcomes from abstinence-based programs. Presented at the 36th International Institute on the Prevention and Treatment of Alcoholism; Stockholm, Sweden; June 1991.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leukefeld CG. Opportunities for enhancing drug abuse treatment with criminal justice authority. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph #106: Improving Drug Abuse Treatment; 1991:328–337.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gold MS. The Good News About Drugs and Alcohol. New York: Villard Books; 1991.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gawin FH, Ellinwood EH Jr. Cocaine and other stimulants. N Eng J Med. 1988;318(18):1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gold MS. The cocaine epidemic: what are the problems, insights, and treatments? Pharmacy Times. March 1987:36–42.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Washton AM, et al. Opiate and cocaine dependencies: techniques to help counter the rising tide. Postgrad Med. 1985;77(5):293–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adapted from Gold MS, et al. New treatments for opiate and cocaine users. Psychiatric Ann. 1986;16(4):208.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nace EP. Alcoholics Anonymous. In Lowinson JH, Ruiz P, Millman RB, eds. Substance Abuse: A Comprehensive Textbook. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark S. Gold
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Neuroscience and PsychiatryUniversity of Florida College of MedicineGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations