Gastrulation pp 225-250 | Cite as

Ultraviolet-Sensitive Determinants of Gastrulation and Axis Development in the Ascidian Embryo

  • William R. Jeffery
Part of the Bodega Marine Laboratory Marine Science Series book series (BMSS)


The axes of the ascidian embryo are determined after fertilization during a series of cytoplasmic movements known as ooplasmic segregation. UV irradiation of the vegetal hemisphere of the fertilized Styela egg during ooplasmic segregation prevents gastrulation, axis formation, and brain sensory cell differentiation without affecting subsequent cytoplasmic movements, the early cleavage pattern, or differentiation of muscle, epidermal, and endodermal cells. Proteins synthesized in UV-irradiated (axis-deficient) and normal embryos were compared by 2D-gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. Of 433 polypeptides detected in normal embryos, only about 5% were missing or decreased in labelling intensity in UV-irradiated embryos. The most prominent of these is a 30,000 molecular weight (pI 6.0) polypeptide (p30). Several lines of evidence suggest that p30 may play a role in embryonic axis formation. First, p30 labelling peaks during gastrulation, when the embryonic axis is being established. Second, p30 labelling and axis formation are abolished by the same threshold UV dose. Third, the UV sensitivity period for abolishing p30 labelling and axis formation are both restricted to ooplasmic segregation. Because the chromophore(s) involved in axis determination exhibits absorption characteristics similar to nucleic acids, rather than proteins, and p30 is not detectibly synthesized until after the conclusion of the UV sensitivity period, p30 cannot be the UV sensitive target localized in the vegetal pole region. In vitro translation of egg RNA and subsequent analysis of protein products showed that p30 is encoded by a maternal mRNA. To determine whether UV irradiation inactivates p30 mRNA, RNA from UV-irradiated and normal eggs was translated in a cell-free system and the labelled proteins were compared by gel electrophoresis. The results showed that translation of p30 mRNA, as well as a number of other mRNAs, was abolished in UV-irradiated embryos. These results show that gastrulation and axis formation are controlled by UV-sensitive components transiently localized in the vegetal hemisphere during ooplasmic segregation and that p30 mRNA is a UV target. UV irradiation of the vegetal pole may affect development by inactivating localized mRNAs encoding proteins that function in gastrulation and axis formation.


Embryonic Axis Normal Embryo Axis Formation Vegetal Pole Animal Hemisphere 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, K.V. 1987. Dorsal-ventral pattern genes of Drosophila. Trends Genet. 3:91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates, W.R. and W.R. Jeffery. 1987a. Alkaline phosphatase expression in ascidian egg fragments and andromerogons. Dev. Biol. 119:382–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates, W.R. and W.R. Jeffery. 1987b. Localization of axial determinants in the vegetal pole region of ascidian eggs. Dev. Biol. 33:197–212.Google Scholar
  4. Berg, W.E. and W.J. Humphrey. 1960. Electron microscopy of four-cell stages of the ascidians Ciona and Styela. Dev. Biol. 2:42–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berleth, T, M. Burri, G. Thoma, D. Bopp, S. Richstein, G. Frigerio, M. Noll, and C. Nüsslein-Volhard. 1988. The role of localization of bicoid mRNA in organizing the anterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 7:1749–1756.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Berrill, N.J. 1935. Studies in tunicate development. III. Differential retardation and acceleration. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 225:266–326.Google Scholar
  7. Cloney, R.A. 1964. Development of the ascidian notochord. Acta Embryol. Morphol. Exp. 7:111–130.Google Scholar
  8. Conklin, E.G. 1905a. Mosaic development in ascidian eggs. J. Exp. Zool. 2:145–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conklin, E.G. 1905b. The organization and cell lineage of the ascidian egg. J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 13:1–119.Google Scholar
  10. Deno, T., H. Nishida, and N. Satoh. 1985. Histospecific acetylcholinesterase development in quarter ascidian embryos derived from each blastomere pair of the 8-cell stage. Biol. Bull. 168:239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dilly, P.N. 1962. Studies on the receptors in the cerebral vesicle of the ascidian tadpole. 1. The otolith. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 103:393–398.Google Scholar
  12. Dilly, P.N. 1964. Studies on the receptors in the cerebral vesicle of the ascidian tadpole. 2. The ocellus. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 105:13–20.Google Scholar
  13. Elinson, R.P. and P. Pasceri 1989. Two UV-sensitive targets in dorsoanterior specification of frog embryos. Development 106:511–518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellison, S.A., R.R. Feiner, and R.F. Hill. 1960. A host effect on bacteriophage survival after ultraviolet irradiation. Virology 11:294–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Epstein, H.T. and J. Schiff. 1960. A simple and rapid method for estimating an action spectrum where nucleic acids (or, in principle, other materials) are the chromophores involved. Exp. Cell Res. 23:623–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerhart, J.C. and R.E. Keller. 1986. Region-specific activities in amphibian gastrulation. Mod. Cell Biol. 2:483–507.Google Scholar
  17. Gimlich, R.L. and J.C. Gerhart. 1984. Early cellular interactions promote embryonic axis formation in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 104:117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeffery, W.R. 1982. Calcium ionophore polarizes ooplasmic segregation in ascidian eggs. Science 216:545–547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeffery, W.R. 1989. Requirement of cell division for muscle actin expression in the primary muscle cell lineage of ascidian embryos. Development 105:75–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeffery, W.R. 1990a. Ultraviolet irradiation prevents gastrulation, sensory cell induction, and axis formation in the ascidian embryo. Dev. Biol. 140:388–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeffery, W.R. 1990b. An ultraviolet-sensitive maternal mRNA encoding a cytoskeletal protein may be involved in axis formation in the ascidian embryo. Dev. Biol. 141:141–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jeffery, W.R. and W.R. Bates. 1989. Ooplasmic segregation in the ascidian Styela. p. 341–367. In:The Molecular Biology of Fertilization. H. Schatten and G. Schatten (Eds.). Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Jeffery, W.R. and S. Meier. 1983. A yellow crescent cytoskeletal domain in ascidian eggs and its role in early development. Dev. Biol. 96:125–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jeffery, W.R. and S. Meier. 1984. Ooplasmic segregation of the myoplasmic actin network in stratified ascidian eggs. Wilhelm Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol. 193:257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jeffery, W.R., C.R. Tomlinson, and R.D. Brodeur. 1983. Localization of actin messenger RNA during early ascidian development. Dev. Biol. 99:408–417.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karnovsky, M.J. and L. Roots. 1964. A “direct-coloring” thiocholine method for cholinesterase. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 12:219–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katz, M.J. 1983. Comparative anatomy of the tunicate tadpole, Ciona intestinalis. Biol. Bull. 164:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kunitz, M. 1950. Crystalline desoxyribonuclease. I. Isolation and general properties. Spectrophometric method for the measurement of desoxyribonuclease activity. J. Gen. Physiol. 33:349–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. March, C.J., B. Mosley, A. Larsen, D.P. Cerretti, G. Braedt, V. Price, S. Gillis, C.S. Henney, S.R. Kronheim, K. Grabstein, P.J. Conlon, T.P. Hopp, and D. Cosman. 1985. Cloning, sequence, and expression of two distinct human interleukin-1 complementary DNAs. Nature 315:641–647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Melton, D.A. 1987. Translocation of a localized maternal mRNA to the vegetal pole of Xenopus oocytes. Nature 328:80–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miyamoto, D.M. and R.J. Crowther. 1985. Formation of the notochord in living ascidian embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 86:1–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nishida, H. 1987. Cell lineage analysis in ascidian embryos by intracellular injection of a tracer enzyme. III. Up to the tissue restricted stage. Dev. Biol. 121:526–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nishida, H. and N. Satoh. 1985. Cell lineage analysis in ascidian embryos by intracellular injection of a tracer enzyme. II. The 16- and 32-cell stages. Dev. Biol. 110:440–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nishida, H. and N. Satoh. 1989. Determination and regulation in the pigment cell lineage of the ascidian embryo. Dev. Biol. 132:355–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nishikata, T., I. Mita-Miyazawa, T. Deno, K. Takamura, and N. Satoh. 1987a. Expression of epidermal-specific antigens during embryogenesis in the ascidian, Halocynthia roretzi. Dev. Biol. 121:408–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nishikata, T., I. Mita-Miyazawa, T. Deno, K. Takamura, and N. Satoh. 1987b. Muscle cell differentiation in ascidian embryos analyzed with a tissue-specific monoclonal antibody. Development 99:163–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ortolani, G. 1961. L’evocazione del cervello nelle larve di Ascidie. Ric. Sci. 31:157–162.Google Scholar
  38. Pelham, H.R.B. and R.J. Jackson. 1976. An efficient mRNA-dependent translation system for reticulocyte lysates. Eur. J. Biochem. 67:247–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reverberi, G. and A. Minganti. 1946. Fenomeni di evoczione nello sviluppo dell’uovo di Ascidie. Risultati dell’indagine sperimentale sull’uvovo di Ascidiella aspersa e di Ascidia malaca allo stadio di 8 blastomeri. Pubhl. Sine. Zool. Napoli I Mar. Ecol. 20:199–152.Google Scholar
  40. Reverberi, G. and A. Minganti. 1947. La distribuzione delle potenze nel germ di Ascidie sllo stadio di otto blastomeri, analizzata mediante le combinazioni e i trapianti di blastomeri. Pubbl. Stne. Zool. Napoli I Mar. Ecol. 21:1–35.Google Scholar
  41. Reverberi, G., G. Ortolani, and N. Farinella-Ferruza. 1960. The causal formation of the brain in the ascidian larva. Acta Embryol. Morphol. Exp. 3:296–336.Google Scholar
  42. Rose, S.M. 1939. Embryonic induction in the Ascidia. Biol. Bull. 77:216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sardet, C., J.E. Speksnijder, S. Inoué, and J.F. Jaffe. 1989. Fertilization and ooplasmic movements in the ascidian egg. Development 105:237–249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Satoh, N. 1978. Cellular morphology and architecture during early morphogenesis of the ascidian egg: An SEM study. Biol. Bull. 155:608–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sawada, T. and K. Osanai. 1981. The cortical contraction related to ooplasmic segregation in Ciona intestinalis egg. Wilhelm Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol. 190:208–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sawada, T. and G. Schatten. 1988. Microtubules in ascidian eggs during meiosis, fertilization, and mitosis. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 9:219–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sawada, T. and G. Schatten. 1989. Effects of cytoskeletal inhibitors on ooplasmic segregation and microtubule organization during fertilization and early development in the ascidian Molgula occidentalis. Dev. Biol. 132:331–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Speksnijder, J.E., C. Sardet, and L.F. Jaffe. 1990. The activation wave of calcium in the ascidian egg and its role in ooplasmic segregation. J. Cell Biol. 110:1589–1598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spemann, H. and H. Mangold. 1924. Uber Induktion von Embryonanlagen durch Implantation artfremder Organisatoren. Wilhelm Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol. 100:599–638.Google Scholar
  50. Setlow, R.B. 1960. Ultraviolet wave-length-dependent effects on proteins and nucleic acids. Radiat. Res. Suppl. 2:276–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stumpf, E. and D. Shugar. 1962. Microscope cover glasses as cut-off filters in the medium ultraviolet. Photochem. Photobiol. 1:337–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tomlinson, C.R., W.R. Bates, and W.R. Jeffery. 1987a. Development of a muscle actin specified by maternal and zygotic mRNA in ascidian embryos. Dev. Biol. 123:470–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tomlinson, C.R., R.L. Beach, and W.R. Jeffery. 1987b. Differential expression of a muscle actin gene in muscle cell lineages of ascidian embryos. Development. 101:751–765.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. van den Biggelaar, J.A.M. and P. Guerrier. 1983. Origin of spatial organization, p. 179–213. In:The Mollusca, Vol. 3, Development. N.H. Verdonk, J.A.M. van den Biggelaar, and A.S. Tomba (Eds.). Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  55. Venuti, J.M. and W.R. Jeffery. 1989. Cell lineage and determination of cell fate in ascidian embryos. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 33:197–212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. West, A.B. and C.C. Lambert. 1975. Control of spawning in the tunicate Styela plicata by variations in a natural light regime. J. Exp. Zool. 195:263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Whittingham, D.G. 1967. Light-induction of shedding of gametes in Ciona intestinalis and Molgula manhattensis. Biol. Bull. 132:292–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whittaker, J.R. 1973. Segregation during ascidian embryogenesis of egg cytoplasmic information for tissue specific enzyme development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70:2096–2100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Whittaker, J.R. 1977. Segregation during cleavage of a factor determining endodermal alkaline phosphatase development in ascidian embryos. J. Exp. Zool. 20:139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Whittaker, J.R. 1982. Muscle lineage cytoplasm can change the developmental expression in epidermal lineage cells of ascidian embryos. Dev. Biol. 93:463–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Winkler, U., H.E. Johns, and E. Kellenberger. 1962. Comparative study of some properties of bacteriophage T4D irradiated with monochromatic ultraviolet light. Virology 18:343–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Youn, B. W. and G.M. Malacinski. 1980. Action spectrum for ultraviolet irradiation of a cytoplasmic component(s) required for neural induction in the amphibian egg. J. Exp. Zool. 211:369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • William R. Jeffery
    • 1
  1. 1.Bodega Marine LaboratoryBodega BayUSA

Personalised recommendations