Skip to main content

Malignant Conversion, the First Stage in Progression, is Distinct from Phorbol Ester Promotion in Mouse Skin

  • Chapter
Boundaries between Promotion and Progression during Carcinogenesis

Part of the book series: Basic Life Sciences ((BLSC,volume 57))

Abstract

Multiple stages in the induction of benign and malignant tumors have been demonstrated experimentally in the mouse skin model system of chemical carcinogenesis1,2. Although skin tumors can be induced by repeated topical applications of a carcinogen3, protocols have been developed which define at least three distinct stages: initiation, promotion and malignant conversion4–6. In a typical experiment, the first stage, initiation, is accomplished by a single exposure to a low dose of a mutagenic carcinogen. Initiation, which may represent a single mutational event7, causes a heritable change in some epidermal cells, which are termed “initiated.” Without subsequent treatment, the initiated cells do not develop into tumors. Repeated topical treatment of initiated mice with a tumor promoter allows the expression of the neoplastic change resulting in the formation of benign squamous papillomas. The second stage, promotion, is effective even when promoter treatments are delayed for several months after initiation, indicating the irreversibility of the initiating mutation. In contrast, the promoting effects of individual TPA applications are reversible since papillomas do not develop after insufficient exposure of initiated skin to promoters or when the interval between individual promoter applications is increased. The reversibility of promotion suggests an epigenetic mechanism. Promotion can be defined as the selective clonal expansion of initiated cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. J. Slaga, Mechanisms involved in two-stage carcinogenesis in mouse skin, in: “Mechanisms of Tumor Promotion, Vol. II, Tumor Promotion and Skin Carcinogenesis,” T. J. Slaga, ed., CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton (1984), pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Hennings, Tumor promotion and progression in mouse skin, in: ”Mechanisms of Environmental Carcinogenesis,” Vol. II. Multistep Models of Carcinogenesis, J. C. Barrett, ed., CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton (1987), pp. 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Shubik, The growth potentialities of induced skin tumors in mice. The effects of different methods of chemical carcinogenesis, Cancer Res. 10:713–717 (1950).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Hennings, R. Shores, M. L. Wenk, E. F. Spangler, R. Tarone, and S. H. Yuspa, Malignant conversion of mouse skin tumors is increased by tumour initiators and unaffected by tumour promoters, Nature 304:67–69 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Hennings, R. Shores, P. Mitchell, E. F. Spangler, and S. H. Yuspa, Induction of papillomas with a high probability of conversion to malignancy, Carcinogenesis 6:1607–1610 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Hennings, E. F. Spangler, R. Shores, P. Mitchell, D. Devor, A. K. M., Shamsuddin, K. M. Elgjo, and S. H. Yuspa, Malignant conversion and metastasis of mouse skin tumors: A comparison of SENCAR and CD-1 mice, Env. Health Perspec. 68:69–74 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Quintanilla, K. Brown, M. Ramsden, and A. Balmain, Carcinogen-specific mutation and amplification of Ha-ras during mouse skin carcinogenesis, Nature 322:78–80 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Burns, R. Albert, B. Altshuler, and E. Morris, Approach to risk assessment for genotoxic carcinogens based on data from the mouse skin initiation-promotion model, Environ. Health Perspect. 50:309–320 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. L. Reddy, and P. J. Fialkow, Papillomas induced by initiation-promotion differ from those induced by carcinogen alone, Nature 304:69–71 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. D. Scribner, N. K. Scribner, B. McKnight, N. K. Mottet, Evidence for a new model of tumor progression from carcinogenesis and tumor promotion studies with 7-bromomethylbenz[a]anthracene, Cancer Res. 43:2034–2041 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. L. Reddy, P. J. Fialkow, Influence of dose of initiator on two-stage skin carcinogenesis in BALB/c mice with cellular mosaicism, Carcinogenesis 9:751–754 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Hennings, D. Devor, M. L. Wenk, T. J. Slaga, B. Former, N. H. Colburn, G. T. Bowden, K. Elgjo, and S. H. Yuspa, Comparison of two-stage epidermal carcinogenesis initiated by 7, 12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene or N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in newborn and adult SENCAR and BALB/c mice, Cancer Res. 41:773–779 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. F. H. Kruszewski, C. J. Conti, and J. DiGiovanni, Characterization of skin tumor promotion and progression in SENCAR mice, Cancer Res. 47:3783–3790 (1987).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. F. O’Connell, A. J. P. Klein-Szanto, D. M. DiGiovanni, J. W. Fries, and T. J. Slaga, Enhanced malignant progression of mouse skin tumors by the free-radical generator benzoyl peroxide, Cancer Res. 46:2863–2865 (1986).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Fujiki, M. Suganuma, N. Matsukura, T. Sugimura, and S. Takayama, Teleocidin from Streptomyces is a potent promoter of mouse skin carcinogenesis, Carcinogenesis 3:895–898 (1982).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Hennings, and S. H. Yuspa, Two-stage tumor promotion in mouse skin: an alternative explanation, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 74:735–740 (1985).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. G. L. Knutsen, R. M. Kovatch, and M. Robinson, Gross and microscopic lesions in the female SENCAR mouse skin and lung in tumor initiation and promotion studies, Env. Health Perspec. 68:91–104 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. M. Ward, S. Rehm, D. Devor, H. Hennings, and M. L. Wenk, Differential carcinogenic effects of intraperitoneal initiation with 7, 12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene or urethane and topical promotion with 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate in skin and internal tissues of female SENCAR and BALB/c mice, Env. Health Perspec. 68:61–68 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Rotstein, J. O’Connell, and T. Slaga, The enhanced progression of papillomas to carcinomas by peroxides in the 2-stage mouse skin model, Proc. Amer. Assn. Cancer Res. 27:143 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. R. Jaffe, J. F. Williamson, and G. T. Bowden, Ionizing radiation enhances malignant progression of mouse skin tumors, Carcinogenesis 8:1753–1755 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. K. M. Barnhart, and G. T. Bowden, Cisplatin as an initiating agent in two-stage mouse skin carcinogenesis, Cancer Letters 29:101–105 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. H. C. Pitot, and H. A. Campbell, Quantitative studies on multistage hepatocarcinogenesis in the rat, in: “Tumor Promoters: Biological Approaches for Mechanistic Studies and Assay Systems,” R. Langenbach, E. Elmore, and J. C. Barrett, eds., Raven Press, New York (1988), pp. 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. H. Moolgavkar, and A. G. Knudson, Jr., Mutation and cancer: a model for human carcinogenesis, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 66:1037–1052 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hennings, H. (1991). Malignant Conversion, the First Stage in Progression, is Distinct from Phorbol Ester Promotion in Mouse Skin. In: Sudilovsky, O., Pitot, H.C., Liotta, L.A. (eds) Boundaries between Promotion and Progression during Carcinogenesis. Basic Life Sciences, vol 57. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5994-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5994-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5996-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5994-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics