Differential Gene Expression During Tumor Promotion and Progression in the Mouse Skin Model
The boundary between promotion and progression in experimental carcinogenesis can be operationally defined as long as stable intermediate stages of tumor formation can be identified. Once operational definitions have been made, investigators can and should pursue questions of molecular mechanisms to explain phenotypic changes that occur during promotion and progression. This paper deals with the identification and characterization of molecular markers (i.e., differentially expressed cellular genes) that identify different stages of mouse skin tumor formation. These marker genes whose steady state levels of messenger are elevated at specific stages in skin tumor formation can serve to define the stages of promotion and progression. There is also the possibility that overexpression of one or a number of these genes actually plays a functional role in tumor formation.
KeywordsTumor Promoter Mouse Skin Back Skin Normal Epidermis Benign Papilloma
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.J. F. O’Connell, A. J. P. Klein-Szanto, D. M. DiGiovanni, J. W. Fries, and T. J. Slaga, Malignant progression of mouse skin papillomas treated with ethylnitrosourea, N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, or 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, Cancer Lett. 30:269–274 (1986).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.P. Krieg, K. Melber, G. Furstenberger, and G. T. Bowden, in: “Growth Factors, Tumor Promoters and Cancer Genes” (UCLA Symposium on Molecular and Cellular Biology), N. Colburn, H. Moses, E. Stanbridge, eds., Alan R. Liss, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
- 11.S. E. Whitman, G. Murphy, P. Angel, N. J. Rahmsdorf, B. J. Smith, A. Lyons, T. J. R. Harris, J. J. Reynolds, P. Herrlich, and J. P. Docherty, Comparison of human stromelysin and collagenase by cloning and sequence analysis, Biochem. J. 240:913–916 (1986).Google Scholar
- 13.L. E. Ostrowski, J. Finch, P. Krieg, L. Matrisian, G. Patskan, J. F. O’Connell, J. Phillips, T. J. Slaga, R. Breathnach, and G. T. Bowden, Expression pattern of a gene for a secreted metalloproteinase during late stages of tumor progression, Molecular Carcinogenesis 1:13–19 (1988).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.J. R. Chen, G. Murphy, and Z. Werb, Stromelysin, a connective tissue-degrading metalloendopeptidase secreted by stimulated rabbit synovial fibroblasts in parallel with collagenase, J. Biol. Chem. 260:12367–12376 (1985).Google Scholar
- 19.S. Garbisa, R. Pozzatti, R. J. Muschel, U. Saffiotti, M. Ballin, R. H. Goldfarb, G. Khoury, and L. A. Liotta, Secretion of type IV collagenolytic protease and metastatic phenotype: induction by transfection with c-Ha-ras but not c-Ha-ras plus Ad2-Ela, Cancer Res. 47:1523–1528 (1987).PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.R. Morrier, L. Daza-Grosjean, and A. Sarasin, The effect of 12-0-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) on cell transformation by simian virus 40 mutants, in “Carcinogenesis: Fundamental Mechanisms and Environmental Effects”, B. Pullman, P. Tso, and H. Gelboin, eds., Reidel, Dordrecht (1980).Google Scholar
- 22.L. Krieg, I. Kuhlmann, and F. Marks, Effect of tumor-promoting phorbol ester and of acetic acid on mechanisms controlling DNA synthesis and mitosis (Chalones) and on the biosynthesis of histidine-rich protein on mouse epidermis, Cancer Res. 23:3135–3146 (1974).Google Scholar