Antimycotic Susceptibility Test of Germ-Tube Forming Cells of Candida Albicans by Rosco Neo-Sensitabs Method
The antifungal susceptibility tests used in clinical mycology have been adopted from bacteriology for more than 30 years with only slight modifications1. Some investigators 1,3 have found an increasing number of weakness in corresponding tests on some diphasic fungi such as C.albicans with morphological conversion from the budding cell form into the parasitic hyphal form. In Taipei, we have found discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo drug susceptibility tests since 1986 2. The prevalence of clusters of miconazole, 5-fluorocytosine and amphotericin resistant strains of C.albicans was once considered to be too high; over 10 %, in patients who have never ever received any antimycotic therapeutics 2. The main purpose of this report is to share our experience using a simple and new method by means of ROSCOSENSITABS agar plate technique 2–4 on GTF cells of C.albicans 5,6 with the profession.
KeywordsCandida Albicans Susceptibility Test Germ Tube Drug Susceptibility Test Antifungal Susceptibility Test
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.T.M. Jen and S.J.Kuo, Influence of germ tube forming cells of Candida albicans to in vitro antimycotic susceptibility test. Chinese Journal of Microbioloay and Immunologv (Taipei), 19: 120 (1986).Google Scholar
- 3.S.Shadomy, A.Espinal-Ingroff and R.Y.Cartwright, Laboratory studies with antifungal agents; susceptibility tests and bioassays, in: “Manual of Clinical Microbiology”, 4th Ed., E.H.Lennette, A. Balows, W.J.Hausler Jr., H.J.Shadomy, eds., pp. 991–999, American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C. (1985).Google Scholar
- 4.J.B.Casals and N.Pringler, “Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing Using Neo-Sensitabs”, 8th Ed., pp. 42–43, Rosco Diagnostica, Taastrup, Denmark (1985).Google Scholar
- 7.J.A.Barnett, R.W.Payne and D.Yarrow, Summary of specific characteristics of yeasts,in: “Yeasts; Characteristics and Identification”, Ist Ed., J.A.Barnett, R.W.Yarrow and L.Barnett, eds., pp. 39–59, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985).Google Scholar
- 8.B.H.Cooper, and M.Silva-Hutner, Yeasts of medical importance in: “Manual of Clinical Microbiology”, 4th Ed., pp. 526–541, E.H.Lennette, A.Balows, W.J.Hausler Jr. and H.J.Shadomy, eds., American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C. (1985).Google Scholar
- 9.T.M.Jen, A modified method to detect dermatophytes in the diagnosis of tinea unguium, Journal of Formosan Medical Association, 86: 1021 (1987).Google Scholar
- 10.T.M.Jen and S.J.Kuo and S.P.Chen, Rapid sucrose fermenters of Candida albicans, Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology(Taipei), 20: M-31 (1987).Google Scholar
- 11.T.M.Jen, S.L.Shern and S.J.Kuo, Studies on Candida isolated from sputa of chronic cases of pulmonary disease in China, Journal of Formosan Medical Association, 66: 187 (1967).Google Scholar
- 13.J.B.Casals and O.G.Pedersen, “Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing Using Neo-Sensitabs A/S Rosco”, 5th Ed., pp. 26–27, Denmark (1980).Google Scholar
- 14.T.M.Jen and S.J.Kuo, Germ tube test negative strains of Candida albicans isolated in Taipei, ROC, Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology (Taipei), 20: 1 (1987).Google Scholar
- 15.T.M.Jen and S.J.Kuo, The fungistatic effect of a human immunoglobulin preparation, Gamastan, on Phialophora dermatitidis, Mycoloaia, LXX: 802 (1978).Google Scholar