Advertisement

Differential Aspects of Parkinsonian Akinesia as Revealed by Limb Movement Studies

  • F. Viallet
  • E. Trouche
  • E. Legallet
  • P. Apicella
  • R. Khalil
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 39)

Summary

Parkinsonian akinesia is known to be a complex symptom. In the present study, some of its phenomenological aspects, such as difficulty in initiating movement and slowness of movement execution, are reassessed by comparing, on the one hand, data obtained in two stimulus-triggered reaction time (RT) tasks involving either aiming (pointing to a visual target) or no aiming (no spatial goal) and, on the other hand, two goal directed task conditions which could be performed either in a closed loop (normal vision of the movement) or in an open loop mode (without visual feedback). The data show that in parkinsonians, the RTs were more prolonged in the no aiming task: this deficit was partly compensated by dopatherapy. Furthermore, these patients exhibited a hypometric tendency in pointing movements when the visual reafferents were lacking. These results show that some of the factors contributing to the expression of akinesia in Parkinson’s disease play a leading role, namely: motivation for the task, expectation that sensory feedback will be used during movement execution, muscle energizing deficits (mainly revealed by the hypometric tendency).

Keywords

Visual Feedback Supplementary Motor Area Reaction Time Task Voluntary Movement Movement Execution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AMABILE, G., FATTAPPOSTA, F., POZZESSERE, G., ALBANI, G., SANARELLI, L., RIZZO, P.A. and POROCUTTI C., 1986 ), Parkinson’s disease: electrophysiological (CNV) analysis related to pharmacological treatment. Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol., 64: 521–524.Google Scholar
  2. BARBEAU, A. and DE GROOT, J.A., 1966, The problem of measurement of akinesia. J. Neurosurg., 24: 331–334.Google Scholar
  3. BERNSTEIN, N.A., 1967, The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. COOKE, J.D., BROWN, J.D. and BROOKS, V.B., 1978, Increased dependence on visual information for movement control in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Can. J. Neurol. Sci., 5: 413–415.Google Scholar
  5. DAY, D.L., DICK, J.P.R. and MARSDEN, C.D., 1984, Patients with Parkinson’s disease can employ a predictive motor strategy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych., 47: 1299–1306.Google Scholar
  6. DEECKE, L., ENGLITZ, H.G., KORNHÜBER, H.H. and SCHMITT, G., 1977, Cerebral potentials preceding voluntary movements in patients with bilateral or unilateral Parkinson akinesia. Progr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1: 151–163.Google Scholar
  7. DICK, J.P.R., CANTELLO, R., BURUMA, O., GIOUX, M. BENECKE, R., DAY, B.L., ROTHWELL, J.C., THOMPSON, P.D. and MARSDEN, C.D., 1987, The Bereitschaftspotential, L-DOPA and Parkinson’s disease. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 66: 263–274.Google Scholar
  8. DICK, J.P.R., ROTHWELL, J.C., DAY, B.L., CANTELLO, R., BURUMA, O., GIOUX, M., BENECKE, R., BERARDELLI, A., THOMPSON, P.D. and MARSDEN, C.D., 1989, The Bereitschaftspotential is abnormal in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 112: 233–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DRAPER, I.T. and JOHNS, R.J., 1964, The disordered movement in parkinsonism and the effect of drug treatment. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 115: 465–480.Google Scholar
  10. FLOWERS, K.A., 1976, Visual “closed-loop” and “open-loop” characteristics of voluntary movement in patients with parkinsonism and intention tremor. Brain 99: 269310.Google Scholar
  11. FLOWERS, K.A., 1978, Lack of prediction in the motor behaviour of parkinsonism. Brain 101: 35–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. GOLDBERG, G., 1985, Supplementary motor area. Structure and function: Review and hypotheses. Behay. Brain Sci. 8: 567–616.Google Scholar
  13. HALLETT, M., 1989, Clinical neurophysiology of akinesia, in: Proceedings of the international meeting of the french neurological society. From posture to initiation of movement. 7.Google Scholar
  14. HALLETT, M. and KHOSHBIN, S., 1980, A physiological mechanism of bradykinesia. Brain 103: 301–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. HEILMAN, K.M., BOWERS, D., WATSON, R.T. and GREER, M., 1976, Reaction times in Parkinson’s disease. Arch. Neurol. 33: 139–140.Google Scholar
  16. HOEHN, M.M. and YAHR, M.D., 1967, Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 17: 427–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. HUMPHREY, D.R., 1979, On the cortical control of visually directed reaching: contributions by non precentral motor areas, in: Posture and movement, R.E. Talbott and D.R. Humphrey, eds., Raven Press, New York, pp. 51–112.Google Scholar
  18. JOUBERT, M. and BARBEAU, A., 1969, Akinesia in Parkinson’s disease, in: Progress in Neurogenetics, A. Barbeau and J.R. Brunette, eds., International Congress Series, 175: 366–376, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. MARSDEN, C.D., 1984, Which motor disorder in Parkinson’s disease indicates the true motor function of the basal ganglia?, in: Functions of the basal ganglia. Ciba Foundation symposium, 107: 225–241, Pitman, London.Google Scholar
  20. MARSDEN, C.D., 1989, Slowness of movement in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders 4: 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MEADOR, F.J., WATSON, R.T., BOWERS, D. and HEILMAN, K.M., 1986, Hypometria with hemispatial and limb motor neglect. Brain 109: 293–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. NARABAYASHI, H., IMAI, H., YOKOCHI, M., HIRAYAMA, K. and NAKAMURA, R., 1976, Cases of pure akinesia without rigidity and tremor and with no effect by L-DOPA therapy, in: Advances in Parkinsonism, W. Birkmayer and O. Hornyckiewicz, eds., Roche, Basle, pp. 335–342.Google Scholar
  23. ROTHWELL, J.C., 1987, Control of human voluntary movement, Croom Helm, London Sydney.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ROUANET, H. and LEPINE, D., 1977, L’analyse des comparaisons pour le traitement des données expérimentales. Informatique et Sciences Humaines 33: 9–123.Google Scholar
  25. SCHWAB, R.S. and ZIEPER, I., 1965, Effects of mood, motivation, stress and alertness on the performance in Parkinson’s disease. Psychiatr. Neurol. 150: 345–357.Google Scholar
  26. SHERIDAN, M.R., FLOWERS, K.A. and HURRELL, J., 1987, Programming and execution of movement in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 110: 1247–1271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SHIBASAKI, H., SHIMA, F. and KUROIWA, Y., 1978, Clinical studies of the movement-related cortical potential (M.P.) and the relationship between the dentatorubrothalamic pathway and readiness potential (R.P.). J. Neurol. 219: 15–25.Google Scholar
  28. STERN, Y., MAYEUX, R., ROSEN, J. and ILSON, J., 1983, Perceptual motor function in Parkinson’s disease: a deficit in sequential and predictive voluntary movement. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych. 46: 145–151.Google Scholar
  29. TERAVAINEN, H. and CALNE, D., 1980, Quantitative assessment of Parkinsonian deficits, in: Parkinson’disease. Current progress, problems and management, U.K. Rinne, M. Klingler and G. Stamm, eds., Elsevier, North-Holland, pp. 145–164.Google Scholar
  30. WALLET, F., TROUCHE, E., BEAUBATON, D., LEGALLET, E. and KHALIL, R., 1984, Impairment of a goal-directed movement performed by Parkinsonians: an objective index of bradykinesia. Neurosci. Lett. Suppl. 18: S. 85.Google Scholar
  31. VIALLET, F., TROUCHE, E., BEAUBATON, D., LEGALLET, E. and KHALIL, R., 1987, Visual feedback and motor performance in human and animal basal ganglia dysfunction, in: Basal ganglia and behavior: sensory aspects of motor functioning, J.S. Schneider and T.I. Lidsky, eds., Hans Huber, Toronto-Lewiston-New York-BernStuttgart, pp. 71–82.Google Scholar
  32. WILSON S.A.K., 1925, The Croonian Lectures on some disorders of motility and of muscle tone, with special reference to the corpus striatum: Lecture I. The Lancet, 1–10.Google Scholar
  33. WISE, R.A., 1982, Neuroleptics and operant behavior: the anhedonian hypothesis. Behay. Brain Sci. 5: 39–87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Viallet
    • 1
  • E. Trouche
    • 2
  • E. Legallet
    • 2
  • P. Apicella
    • 2
  • R. Khalil
    • 1
  1. 1.Service de NeurologieMarseille Cedex 5France
  2. 2.LNF 3 — CNRS — 31Marseille Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations