The Development of Striatal Compartmentalization: The Role of Mitotic and Postmitotic Events

  • Janice G. Johnston
  • Gord Fishell
  • Leslie A. Krushel
  • Derek van der Kooy
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 39)


An intriguing question in the evolution of the mammalian brain is how pattern can be conserved despite enormous changes in size and functional capacities. This phenomenon is dramatically demonstrated in the striatum where compartmental pattern is conserved across different mammalian species (Johnston et al., 1990)(Fig.1). Although the majority of the mammalian striatum is comprised of a seemingly homogeneous population of medium spiny neurons (Kemp and Powell, 1970), it can be compartmentalized into two subdivisions, the patch and matrix compartments, on the basis of different distributions of neurotransmitters, receptors and connections (Graybiel et al. 1981; Gerfen et al, 1984; van der Kooy et a1., 1987). Compartmentalization of the striatum into small patches in a matrix background is restricted to mammals (Reiner et al., 1989) and has been shown in rodents (Herkenham and Pert, 1981), cats (Graybiel et al., 1981), monkeys (Goldman-Rakic, 1982) and humans (Haber, 1986). Despite the large differences in total striatal size, the ratio of patch/matrix area and the number of individual patches is maintained in different mammalian species (Johnston et al., 1990; Fig. 1). The maintenance of striatal compartmentalization suggests that common developmental mechanisms are involved in establishing this pattern and raises many questions concerning how this is achieved. We hypothesize, first, that cell lineages are committed to becoming members of compartments while still proliferating in the ventricular zone and that these precursors share common properties with the precursors which produce the compartments of the other major portion of the telencephalon, the cerebral cortex. Second, we suggest that the adult striatal pattern of small patches embedded within a matrix background is produced through cellular interactions in the postmitotic region that position compartmentally committed cells.


Ventricular Zone Striatal Cell Matrix Background Reeler Mouse Matrix Compartment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angevine, J.B. and R. L. Sidman, Autoradiographic study of cell migration during histogenesis of cerebral cortex in mice (1961) Nature 192: 766–768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Drager, U.C., Observations on the organization of the visual cortex in the reeler mouse (1981) J. Comp. Neurol. 201: 555–570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Edelman, G.M., Adult maps: stabilized competition with fixed circuitry (1987) in Neural Darwinism ( Basic Books Inc., New York ) pp. 126–138.Google Scholar
  4. Fishell, G. and D. van der Kooy, Neurons with early projections to the substantia nigra survive the cell death period (1990) J. Neurosci., in press.Google Scholar
  5. Fishell, G. and D. van der Kooy, Pattern formation in the striatum: Developmental changes in the distribution of striatonigral neurons (1987) J. Neurosci. 7: 1969–1978.Google Scholar
  6. Fishell, G., Rossant, J. and D. van der Kooy, Neuronal lineages in chimeric mouse forebrain are segregated between compartments and in the rostrocaudal and radial planes (1989) Develop. Biol., in press.Google Scholar
  7. Gerfen, C.R., The neostriatal mosaic: compartmentalization of corticostriatal input and striatonigral input and output systems (1984) Nature 311: 461–464.Google Scholar
  8. Goldman-Rakic, P.S., Prenatal formation of cortical input and development of cytoarchitectonic compartmentalization of the monkey (1981) J. Neurosci. 1: 721–735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Graybiel, A.M., C.W. Ragsdale Jr., E.S. Yoneka and R.P. Elde, An immunohistochemical study of enkephalins and other neuropeptides in the striatum of the cat with evidence that the opiate peptides are arranged to form mosaic patterns in register with the striosomal compartments visible by acetylcholinesterase staining (1981) Neuroscience 6: 377–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haber, S.N., Transmitter systems of the human and nonhuman primate basal ganglia (1986) Human Neurobiology 5: 159–168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Herkenham, M. and C.B. Pert, Mosaic distribution of opiate receptors, parafasicular projections and acetylcholinesterase in the rat striatum (1981) Nature 291: 415–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrup, K. and J.E. Crandall, Cell lineage in the mouse somatosensory cortex: analysis of chimeras (1989) Neurosci Abstr., 15: 599.Google Scholar
  13. Jensen, K.F. and H.P. Killackey, Subcortical projections from ectopic neocortical neurons (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 964–968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnston, J.G., Boyd, S.R. and D. van der Kooy, Compartmentalization of the embryonic striatum after intraocular transplantation (1987) Dev. Brain Res. 33: 310–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnston, J.G. and D. van der Kooy, Protooncogene expression identifies a transient columnar organization of the forebrain within the late embryonic ventricular zone (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 1066–1070.Google Scholar
  16. Johnston, J.G., Krushel, L.A. and D. van der Kooy, Maintenance of striatal compartments in the reeler mouse suggests pattern formation independent of glial guidance (1989) Neurosci. Abstr., 15: 101.Google Scholar
  17. Johnston, J.G., S. Haber, C.R. Gerfen and D. van der Kooy, Mechanisms of striatal pattern formation: Conservation of mammalian compartmentalization (1990), submitted.Google Scholar
  18. Kemp, J.M. and T.P.S. Powell, The structure of the caudate nucleus of the cat: light and electron microscopy (1971) Phil. Trans B. 262: 383–401.Google Scholar
  19. Krushel, L.A., J. Connolly, and D. van der Kooy, Pattern formation in the mammalian forebrain: patch neurons from the rat striatum selectively reassociate in vitro (1989) Dev. Brain Res. 47: 137–142.Google Scholar
  20. Krushel, L.A. and D. van der Kooy, Birthdate is more important than tissue type for the in vitro reassociation of early postmitotic cortical and striatal neurons (1988) Neurosci. Abstr., 14: 91.Google Scholar
  21. Krushel, L.A., Johnston, J.G., Fishell, G. and D. van der Kooy, Retroviral vectors reveal compartmental specific cell lineages in the developing rat forebrain (1989) Neurosci Abstr., 15: 598.Google Scholar
  22. Lanca, A.J., S. Boyd, B.E. Kolb and D. van der Kooy, The development of a patchy organization of the rat striatum (1986) Dev. Brain Res. 27: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lemmon, V. and A.L. Pearlman, Does laminar position determine field properties of cortical neurons? A study of corticotectal cells in area 17 of the normal mouse and the reeler mutant (1981) J. Neurosci. 1: 83–93.Google Scholar
  24. Levine, J.M., Beasley, L. and W.B. Stallcup, The D1.1 antigen: a cell surface marker for germinal cells of the central nervous system (1984) J. Neurosci. 4: 820–831.Google Scholar
  25. Levitt, P, Cooper, M.L. and P. Rakic, Coexistence of neuronal and glial the cerebral ventricular zone of the fetal monkey: immunoperoxidase analysis precursors cells in an ultrastructural (1981) J. Neurosci. 1: 27–39.Google Scholar
  26. Lushkin, M.B., Pearlman, A.L. and J. R. Sanes, Cell lineage in the cerebral cortex of the mouse studied in vivo and in vitro with a recombinant retrovirus (1988) Neuron 1: 635–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McConnell, S.K., Fates of visual cortical neurons in the ferret after isochronic and heterochronic transplantation (1988) J. Neurosci. 8: 945–974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McConnell, S. K., The determination of cell fate in the cerebral cortex (1989) Trends Neurosci. 12: 342–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Price, J. and L. Thurlow, Cell lineage in the rat cerebral cortex: a study using retroviral-mediated gene transfer (1988) Development 104: 473–482.Google Scholar
  30. Rakic, P., Mode of cell migration to the superficial layers of the fetal monkey neocortex (1972) J. Comp. Neurol. 145: 61–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reiner, A., S.E. Brauth, C.A. Kitt and R. Quiron, Distribution of mu, delta, and kappa opiate receptor types in the forebrain and midbrain of pigeon (1989) J. Comp. Neurol. 280: 359–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simons, D.J., Durham, D. and T.A. Woosley, Functional organization of mouse and rat SmI barrel cortex following vibrissal damage on different postnatal days (1984) Somatosens. Res. 1: 207–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stanfield, B.B. and D. D.M. O’Leary, Fetal occipital cortical neurons transplants to the rostral cortex can extend and maintain a pyramidal tract axon (1985) Nature (London) 313: 135–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van der Kooy, D. and G. Fishell, Neuronal birthdate underlies the development of striatal compartments (1987) Brain Res. 401: 155–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van der Kooy, D., G. Fishell, L.A. Krushel, and J. Johnston, The development of striatal compartments: from proliferation to patches (1987) In M.B. Carpenter, and A. Jayaraman (eds) The Basal Ganglia II, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, pp. 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Voorn, P., A. Kalsbeek, B. Jorrisam-Byham and H.J. Groenewegen, The pre-and postnatal development of the dopamine cell groups in the ventral mesencephalon and dopaminergic innervation of the striatum of the rat (1988) J. Neurosci. 25: 857–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walsh C. and C.L. Cepko, Clonally related cortical cells show several migration patterns (1988) Science 241: 1342–1345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janice G. Johnston
    • 1
  • Gord Fishell
    • 1
  • Leslie A. Krushel
    • 1
  • Derek van der Kooy
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurobiology Research Group, Department of AnatomyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations