A Methodology for Eliciting Users Cognitive Models of Computer-Based Systems

  • Sven A. Carlsson


Over the past couple of years there has been a growing attention to mental models of artifacts like computer-based systems. It is assumed that research on mental models can enhance our understanding of computer-based systems uses; an understanding which can influence how we design and assess computer-based systems.

This paper presents an approach to mental modelling which is based on Kelly’s (1955) personal construct psychology. The primary purpose of this paper is to present and apply a version of the Role Construct Repertoire Interview, a methodology used to elicit a person’s mental model of a domain.

A study conducted in a natural setting of three spreadsheet program users are used to exemplify the applicability of the methodology. The more general use of the methodology in the information systems area is also discussed.


Mental Model Personal Construct Integrative Complexity Spreadsheet Program Construct System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderberg, M. R., 1973, Cluster Analysis for Applications, Academic Press, New York, NY. Bannister, J., and Fransella, F., 1980, Inquiring Man: The Psychology of Personal Constructs, 2nd ed., Penguin, Harmondsworth, England.Google Scholar
  2. Boorman, S. A., and D. C. Oliver, 1973, Metrics on Spaces of Finite Trees, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 10, pp. 26–59.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boose, J. H., 1986, Expertise Transfer for Expert Systems Design, Elsevier, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, D. J., 1988, Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 40–52.Google Scholar
  5. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A., 1980, Computer Text-Editing: An Information-Processing Analysis of a Routine Cognitive Skill, Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 12, pp. 32–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A., 1983, The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.Y.Google Scholar
  7. Carlsson, S. A., 1988a, A Longitudinal Study of Spreadsheet Program Use, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 82–100.Google Scholar
  8. Carlsson, S. A., 1988b, Why Johnny Can’t or Won’t Spreadsheet, The 11th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Roros, Norway, August 10–12.Google Scholar
  9. Carlsson, S. A., (in preparation), User Model and Use of Decision Support Systems: A Cognitive Learning Perspective,Ph.D. thesis in preparation, Dept. of Information and Computer Science, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
  10. Carlsson, S. A., and Konsynski, B. R., 1987, A Complexity Metric for Spreadsheet Models,Unpublished working papers.Google Scholar
  11. Carlsson, S. A., and Stabell, C. B., 1986, Spreadsheet Programs and Decision Support: A Keystroke-level Model of System User, Decision Support Systems: A Decade in Perspective, E. McLean and H. Sol, eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 113–128.Google Scholar
  12. Carroll, J. D., and Arabie, P., 1980, Multidimensional Scaling, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 31, pp. 607–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Easterby-Smith, M., 1981, The Design, Analysis, and Interpretation of Repertory Grids, Recent Advances in Personal Construct Technology, Shaw, M., ed., Academic Press, London, pp. 9–30.Google Scholar
  14. Fjeldstad, O. D., and Konsynski, B. R., 1987, Knowledge-Based Support of the User-DSS Interaction, Proceedings of the Twentieth Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, pp. 581–589.Google Scholar
  15. Fuglseth, A. M., and Stabell, C. B., 1985, Capture, Representation, and Diagnosis of User Information Perception, Knowledge Representation for Decision Support Systems, Methlie, L. B., and Sprague, R. H., eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 191–210.Google Scholar
  16. For discussions of different approaches to task complexity, see Campbell (1988) and Wood (1986). In future work we will apply some of these approaches to measure/assess complexity of tasks/activities supported by computer-based systems.Google Scholar
  17. Gardner, H., 1985, The Minds New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution, Basic Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  18. Grudnitski, G., 1981, A Methodology for Eliciting Information Relevant to Decision Makers, Proceedings Google Scholar
  19. of the Second International Conference on Information Systems,Cambridge, MA, pp. 105–120. Grudnitski, G., 1984, Eliciting Decision-Makers’ Information Requirements: Application of the Rep TestGoogle Scholar
  20. Methodology, Journal of the Management Information Systems,Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 11–32. Johnson, S. C., 1967, Hierarchical Clustering Schemes, Psychometrika,Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 241–254.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson-Laird, P. N., 1983, Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Google Scholar
  22. Consciousness,Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Kelly, G. A., 1955, The Psychology of Personal Constructs, W W Norton & Company, New York, NY. Kieras, D. E., and Polson, P. G., 1985, An Approach to the Formal Analysis of User Complexity, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 22, pp. 365–394.Google Scholar
  24. Kolb, D. A., 1984, Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  25. Lee, D. M. S., 1986, Usage Pattern and Sources of Assistance for Personal Computer Users, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lerch, F. J., 1986, Computerized Financial Planning: Discovering Cognitive Difficulties in Model Building, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  27. Mancuso, J. C., and Shaw, M. L. G., eds., 1988, Cognition and Personal Structure: Computer Access and Analysis, Praeger, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  28. Mittman, B. S., and Moore, J. H., 1984, Senior Management Computer Use: Implications for DSS Designs and Goals, Transactions of the Fourth International Conference on Decision Support Systems, DSS-84, Dallas, TX, pp. 42–49.Google Scholar
  29. Monk, A., 1985, How and When to Collect Behavioral Data, Fundamentals of Human-Computer Interaction, A. Monk, ed., Academic Press, London, pp. 69–79.Google Scholar
  30. Moran, T. P., 1983, Getting Into a System: External-Internal Task Mapping Analysis, Proceedings of the CHI ‘83 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, December 12–15, Boston, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 45–49.Google Scholar
  31. Newell, A., and Simon, H., 1972, Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Norman, D. A., Draper, S. W., eds., 1986, User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  32. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H., 1957, The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  33. Poison, P. G., 1987, A Quantitative Theory of Human-Computer Interaction, Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Google Scholar
  34. Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction, J. M. Carroll, ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 184–235. Polson, P. G., and Kieras, D. E., 1985, A Quantitative Model of the Learning and Performance of TextGoogle Scholar
  35. Editing Knowledge, Proceedings CHI ‘85 Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 14–18,San Fran-Google Scholar
  36. cisco, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 213–220.Google Scholar
  37. Pyburn, P. J., 1986–87, Managing Personal Computer Use: The Role of Corporate Management Information Systems, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar
  38. Quillard, J. A., Rockart, J. F., Wilde, E., Vernon, M., and Mock., G., 1983, A Study of the Corporate Use of Personal Computers, CISR Working Paper No. 109, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  39. Rich, E., 1983, Users are Individuals: Individualizing User Models, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rockart, J. F., and Flannery, L. S., 1983, The Management of End User Computing, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26, No. 10, pp. 776–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Romesburg, C., 1984, Cluster Analysis for Researchers, Lifetime Learning, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  42. Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J., and Streufert, S., 1967, Human Information Processing, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Shaw, M. L. G., 1980, On Becoming a Personal Scientist: Interactive Computer Elicitation of Personal Models of the World, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  44. Shaw, M. L. G., ed., 1981, Recent Advances in Personal Construct Technology, Academic Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  45. Shaw, M. L. G., 1988, Interactive Elicitation and Exchange of Knowledge, to appear in the International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology.Google Scholar
  46. Shaw, M. L. G., and Gaines, B. R., 1988, An Interactive Knowledge Elicitation Technique Using Personal Construct Technology, Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems: A Practical Handbook, A Kidd, ed.,Plenum Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  47. Stabell, C. B., 1974, Individual Differences in Managerial Decision Making Processes: A Study ofConversational Computer System Usage, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  48. Stabell, C. B., 1978, Integrative Complexity of Information Environment Perception and Information Use, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Streufert, S., and Streufert, S. C., 1978, Behavior in the Complex Environment, V. H. Winston & Sons, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  50. Streufert, S., and Swezey, R. W., 1986, Complexity, Managers, and Organizations, Academic Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  51. Wood, R. E., 1986, Task Complexity: Definition of the Construct, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Young, R. M., 1983, Surrogates and Mappings: Two Kinds of Conceptual Models of Interactive Devices, Mental Models, D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp.37, 35–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven A. Carlsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Information & Computer ScienceUniversity of LundLundSweden

Personalised recommendations