Advertisement

A Speech Act Based Model for Analyzing Cooperative Work in Office Information Systems

  • Esa Auramäki

Abstract

In this paper we present the SAMPO-approach for modelling and analyzing office information systems. We emphasize the collective features of office work and the role of communications in coordinating the collective efforts. The approach is based on the language action view where language is seen as a means of doing things. The approach also accepts the fact that collective work includes both harmony and conflict and tries to capture both of these features.

Keywords

Propositional Content Sincerity Condition Planning Group Discourse Process Illocutionary Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auramäki, E., Lehtinen, El, and Lyytinen, K., 1988, A Speech Act Based Office Modelling Approach, ACM TOOLS, Vol. 6, No. 2, April 1988.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, J., 1962, How to do Things with Words, Claredon Press, London.Google Scholar
  3. Bacon, J., 1980, Conflict Management in the Systems Environment, Journal of Systems Management, February 1980.Google Scholar
  4. Banerjee, J., Chou, H-T, Garza, J., Kim, W., Woelk, D., Ballou, N., and Kim, H-J, 1987, Data Model Issues for Object-Oriented Applications, ACM TOOLS, Vol. 5, No. 1, January 1987.Google Scholar
  5. Borgida, A., 1985, Language Features for flexible Handling of Exceptions in Information Systems, ACM TOOLS, Vol. 10, No. 4, December 1985.Google Scholar
  6. Briefs, U., Ciborra, C., and Schneider, L., eds, 1983, Systems Design For, With, and By the Users, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  7. Canning McNurlin, B., ed., 1986, Spotlight on Group Services, EDP Analyzer, Vol. 24, No. 11, November 1986.Google Scholar
  8. Ciborra, C., 1984, Management Information Systems: A Contractual View, Beyond Productivity: Information Systems Development for Organizational Effectiveness, Bemelmans, Th. M. A., ed., Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., North-Holland.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, P., and Levesque, H., 1987, Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication, November 24, 1987.Google Scholar
  10. CSCW86, 1986, Materials of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work,Austin, Texas. Dimino, S., 1983, Corporate Politics and the System’s Process, Journal of Systems Management,September 1983.Google Scholar
  11. Flores, F., and Ludlow, J., 1980, Doing and Speaking in the Office, Decision Support Systems: Issues and Challenges, Fick, G., and Sprague, R., eds., Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Hirschheim, R., 1985, Office Automation, A Social and Organizational Perspective, John Wiley and Sons. Howard, R., 1987, Design and Social Responsibility: The Political Implications of ‘Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Office: Technology and People, 3, pp. 175–187.Google Scholar
  13. Jarke, M., Jelassi, M., and Shakun, M., 1987, MEDIATOR: Towards a Negotiation Support System, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 31, No. 3.Google Scholar
  14. Kimbrough, S., 1988, “On Representation Schemes for Electronic Promising”, a paper presented at the 21st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 1988.Google Scholar
  15. Koo, C., 1988, A Commitment-Based Communication Model for Distributed Office Environments, Proc. of Conf. on Office Information Systems, SIGOIS Bulletin, Vol. 9, No. 2 and 3, April and July 1988.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, R., 1988, A Logic Model for Electronic Contracting, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1, March 1988.Google Scholar
  17. Lehtinen, E., and Lyytinen, K., 1986, Action Based Model of Information Systems, Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 3.Google Scholar
  18. Lyytinen, K., and Lehtinen, K., 1984, On Information Modelling Through Illocutionary Logic, Third Scandinavian Research Seminar on Information Modelling and Data Base Management, Kangassalo, H., ed., Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, Ser. B 22.Google Scholar
  19. Lyytinen, K., and Lehtinen, K., 1985, Discourse Analysis as an Information System Specification Method, Proceedings of the 7th Scandinavian Seminar on Systemeering, Sääksjärvi, M., ed., Helsinki.Google Scholar
  20. Malone, T., Grant, K., Lai, K-Y, Rao, R., and Rosenblitt, D., 1987(a), Semistructured Messages are Surprisingly Useful for Computer Supported Coordination, ACM TOOLS, Vol. 5, No. 2, April 1987.Google Scholar
  21. Malone, T., Grant, K., Turbak, F., Brobst, S., and Cohen, M., 1987(b), Intelligent Information-Sharing Systems, CACM, Vol. 30, No. 5, May 1987.Google Scholar
  22. Malone, T., Yates J., and Benjamin, R., 1987(c), Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies, CACM, Vol. 30, No. 6, June 1987.Google Scholar
  23. Morgan, G., 1986, Images of Organization, SAGE Publications Inc., Beverly Hills, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Olson, J. R., Conway, L., and Atkins, D., 1987, The EXPRESS Project: Research Issues in Building and Implementing a Platform for Collaborative Technologu, Proc. of the 8th ICIS Conference, DeGross, J., and Kriebel, C., eds., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  25. Searle, J., 1969, Speech Acts - An Essay in the Philosophy of Language,Cambridge University Press. Searle, J., and Vanderveken, D., 1985, Foundations of Illocutionary Logic,Cambridge University Press. Srikanth, R., and Jarke, M., 1986, Individual Negotiation Support in Group Decision Support Systems, Proc. of IFIP WG 8.4 Working Conf. Office Systems: Methods and Tools,North-Holland.Google Scholar
  26. Tsichritzis, D., Fiume, E., Gibbs, S., and Nierstrasz, 0., 1987, Knowledge Acquisition, Dissemination, and Manipulation Objects, ACM TOOLS, Vol. 5, No. 1, January 1987.Google Scholar
  27. Winograd, T., and Flores, F., 1986, Understanding Computers and Cognition, A New Foundation for Design, Ablex Publishing Company, Norwood, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  28. Winograd, T., 1987, A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work, Report No. STANCS-87–1158, Stanford University, Department of Computer Science, May 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esa Auramäki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations