Cooling of the Synchrotron Radiation Shield in the Eloisatron Magnets

  • Lorenzo Resegotti
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS, volume 53)

Abstract

Heating by synchrotron radiation from a proton beam starts to create problems at high beam intensities in the superconducting magnets of the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC)1 in the USA and of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)2 at CERN, but its consequences are conspicuous in the ELOISATRON design3, even at the modest beam intensity foreseen in the present parameter list4. For a preliminary evaluation, the parameters in table 1 are assumed. With these parameters, the synchrotron radiation at top energy would have a critical energy of 10.7 keV, and the radiated power per unit length of dipole field would be 1.84 W/m. Such a heat load would be unacceptably large for the ELOISATRON magnets, which are assumed to be cooled by helium II at 1.8 K (with a planned specific load of less than 0.2 W/m). It is therefore essential for the synchrotron radiation power to be almost entirely intercepted by a shield, cooled by ordinary helium. For obvious reasons of space this shield would best consist, at least inside the magnets, of the beam chamber itself.

Keywords

Enthalpy Helium Eter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    SSC Central Design Group, Conceptual design of the Superconducting Super Collider, SSC-SR-2020 (March 1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Brianti and K. Hubner, ed., The Large Hadron Collider in the LEP tunnel, CERN 87–05 (May 1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Zichichi, project leader, The ELOISATRON project (June 1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Johnsen, The ELOISATRON, in this bookGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Burnod and J. Gareyte, LHC parameters, CERN/SPS/Int. Note EMA 89–7, LHC Note 92 (May 1989)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.D. McCarty, Thermophysical properties of helium-4 from 2 to 1500 K with pressures to 1000 atmospheres, NBS Technical Note 631 (1972)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.A. Hands, Fluid dynamics, in.“Cryogenic Engineering”, B.A. Hands, ed., Academic Press, London (1986)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    I.E. Idel’chik, “Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance”, Gosundarstvennoe Energeticheskoe Izdatel’stvo, Moskva ( 1960 ), Israel Programme for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem (1966)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Benvenuti (CERN), Private communicationGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Benvenuti, R.S. Calder and G. Passardi, The influence of thermal radiation on the vapour pressure of condensed hydrogen between 2 and 4.5 K, CERN divisional report ISRVA/76–19 (1976)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Resegotti
    • 1
  1. 1.MeyrinSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations