Advertisement

A Comparison of “Pure” Alzheimer’s Disease and Alzheimer’s Disease Plus Vascular Lesions (Mixed Dementia) in the Elderly

  • P. Davous
  • C. Fallet-Bianco
  • M. Roudier
  • Y. Lamour
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 38A)

Abstract

It is widely accepted that senile dementia of the Alzheimer type and dementia due to vascular lesions are the two most common kinds of dementia in the elderly. However, the clinical criteria required to differentiate these two major progressive dementias are still unreliable (1, 2, 3). Furthermore, it has been shown (4, 5) that there were difficulties in classifying patients based on morphologic findings. Validation studies by Tierney et al (6) and Davous et al (7) demonstrated that depending on the neuropathological criteria applied, the same patients could be classified as Alzheimer’s disease or mixed dementia. In order to investigate further the concept of mixed dementia, we established a comparison of neurological, neuropsychological and pathological findings in 2 groups of patients prospectively studied and referred independently by the neuropathologist as “pure” Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Alzheimer’s disease plus vascular lesions or mixed dementia (MD).

Keywords

Vascular Lesion Vascular Dementia Vascular Risk Factor Abnormal Neurological Finding Ischaemic Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I. Alafuzoff, K. Iqbal, H. Friden, R. Adolfsson, B. Winblad, Histopathological criteria for progressive dementia disorders: clinico-pathological correlation and classification by multivariate data analysis, Acta Neuropathol., 74, 209–225 (1987)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. H. Liston, A. La Rue, Clinical differentiation of primary degenerative and multi-infarct dementia: a critical review of the evidence. Part I: clinical studies, Biol. Psychiatry, 18, 1451–1465 (1983)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. K. Mölsä, L. Paljärvi, J. O. Rinne, U. K. Rinne, E. Säkö, Validity of clinical diagnosis in dementia: a prospective clinico-pathological study, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 48, 1085–1090 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. E. Tomlinson, G. Blessed, M. Roth, Observations on the brains of demented old people, J. Neurol. Sci., 11, 205–242 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Ulrich, A. Probst, M. Wiest, The brain diseases causing senile dementia. A morphological study on 54 consecutive autopsy cases, J. Neural., 233, 118–122 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. C. Tierney, R. H. Fisher, A. J. Lewis, M. L. Zorzitto, W. G. Snow, D. W. Reid, P. Nieuwstraten, The NINCDS-ADRDA work group criteria for the clinical diagnosis of probable Alzheimer’s disease: a clinico-pathologic study of 57 cases, Neurology, 38, 359–364 (1988).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Davous, C. Fallet-Bianco, Y. Lamour, M. Roudier, Validation neuropathologique du diagnostic clinique de démence sénile de type Alzheimer, Revue Neurol. (Paris), in press (1990).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Fallet-Bianco, M. Roudier, Y. Lamour, P. Davous, Etude neuropathologique de 50 cas de démence sénile, Revue Neurol.(Paris), in press (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. F. Folstein, S. E. Folstein, P. R. Mc Hugh, Mini Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician, J. Psychiat. Res., 12, 189–198 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Davous, Y. Lamour, M. Roudier, Etude neurologique standardisée dans la démence sénile de type Alzheimer, Encéphale, 15, 387–396 (1989).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Roudier, P. Marcie, N. Podrabinek, Y. Lamour, P. Davous, Etude neuropsychologique quantifiée dans la démence sénile de type Alzheimer, Encéphale, 15, 397–403 (1989).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Loeb, C. Gandolfo, Diagnostic evaluation of degenerative and vascular dementia, Stroke, 14, 399–401 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. E. Tomlinson, G. Blessed, M. Roth, Observations on the brains of non-demented old people, J. Neurol. Sci., 7, 331–356 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. C. M. Brust, Vascular dementia is overdiagnosed, Arch. Neural., 45, 799–801 (1988).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. D. O’Brien, Vascular dementia is underdiagnosed, Arch. Neurol., 45, 797–798 (1988).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Scheinberg, Dementia due to vascular disease. A multifactorial disorder, Stroke, 19, 1291–1299 (1988).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Davous
    • 1
  • C. Fallet-Bianco
    • 2
  • M. Roudier
    • 3
  • Y. Lamour
    • 4
  1. 1.C.H.R. Victor-DupouyArgenteuilFrance
  2. 2.Sainte-Anne HospitalParisFrance
  3. 3.Ch. Richet HospitalVilliers-le-BelFrance
  4. 4.INSERM U 161ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations