Advertisement

Metabolism of Sedatives in Liver Disease

  • Steven Schenker
  • Anastacio M. Hoyumpa
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 272)

Abstract

The liver has a key role in drug disposition and elimination. This is by virtue of 1) its strategic location astride the portal vein and 2) its large enzymatic complement for drug metabolism. The first of these, location along intestinal venous drainage, implies that drugs absorbed via the gastrointestinal tract will initially enter the liver and be excluded from the systemic circulation (presystemic or first pass effect). To the extent that such absorbed drugs are metabolized within the liver or are shunted around it, concentrations of the parent drug in blood and target organs will vary. Drugs with extensive hepatic metabolism are thus likely to be affected the most with liver disease- and/or shunting. The bioavailability of such agents (see later) in such a setting is likely to be increased, leading to a lesser first pass effect and toxic side effects may ensue. As regards the second point, the liver has the largest amount of biotransforming enzymes for most drugs. It contributes also importantly to the removal of some drugs via biliary excretion. Thus, impairment of either process, as with liver disease, is likely to decrease drug removal and may result in drug accumulation and ultimately in its toxicity. It is evident, therefore, that liver disease and drug metabolism are closely related processes (1).

Keywords

Liver Disease Chronic Liver Disease Hepatic Encephalopathy Drug Disposition Intrinsic Clearance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hoyumpa AM “et al”. Influence of liver disease on the disposition and elimination of drugs. In: Diseases of Liver. Schiff L and Schiff ER (eds.), 5th Edition. JB Lippincott Co, Philadelphia, 1982, pp. 709–746.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fessel JC “et al”. An analysis of the causes and prevention of hepatic coma. Gastroenterology 62:191, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoyumpa AM “et al”. Major drug interactions: effect of liver disease, alcohol and malnutrition. Ann Rev Med 33:113–149, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Secor JW “et al”. Drug metabolism in patients with liver disease. Adv Intern Med 32: 379–406, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilkinson GR “et al”. Commentary: Effects of liver disease on drug disposition in man. Biochem Pharmacol 25:2675– 2681, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mitchell MC “et al”. Hepatic drug metabolism and drug-induced liver disease. In: Current Hepatology, Vol 3, Gitnick GL (ed). J Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1983, pp. 205–237.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roberts RK “et al”. The influence of liver disease on drug disposition. Clinics Gastro 8:105–121, 1979Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilkinson GR “et al”. Drug disposition and liver disease. Drug Metab Rev 1975;4:139–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roberts RK “et al”. Drug prescribing in hepatobiliary disease. Drugs 17:198–212, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Desmond PV “et al”. Preservations of glucuronidation in carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury in the rat. Biochem Pharmacol 30: 993–999, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McHorse TS “et al”. Effect of acute viral hepatitis in man on the disposition and elimination of meperidine. Gastroenterology 68:775–780, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burnett DA “et al”. Altered elimination of antipyrine in patients with acute viral hepatitis. Gut 17:34, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berkowitz BA “et al”. The disposition of morphine in surgical patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther .17:629, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Held VH “et al”. Pharmakokinetik von glymidine (glycodiazin) und tolbutamid bei akuten und chronischen leberschaden. Arzneimittel-Forsch 23:1801, 1973.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huet P-M “et al”. Determinants of drug disposition in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology 3:913–918, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Branch RA “et al”. Determinants of serum antipyrine halflives in patients with liver disease. Gut 14:569, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burnstein AV “et al”. [14C] aminopyrine breath test in chronic liver disease. Dig Dis Sci 26 :1078–1083, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marshall JP “et al”. Disposition of nafcillin in patients with cirrhosis and extrahepatic biliary obstruction. Gastroenterology 73:1388–1392, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morgan DJ “et al”. Hepatic drug clearance in chronic liver disease: can we expect to find a universal, quantitative marker of hepatic function. Comments. Hepatology Elsewhere 10:893–894, 1989.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hepner GW “et al”. Disposition of aminopyrine, antipyrine, diazepam and ICG in patients with liver disease. J Lab Clin Med 90:40, 1977.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kawasaki S “et al”. Hepatic clearances of antipyrine, indocyanine green and galactose in normal subjects and in patients with chronic liver disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther 44:217–224, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Doshi J “et al”. Microsomal pentobarbital hydroxylase activity in acute viral hepatitis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 140:492, 1972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    James R “et al”. The differencial localization of various drug metabolizing systems within the rat liver lobule as determined by the hepatotoxins allyl alcohol, carbon tetrachloride and bromobenzene. J.Pharmacol Exp Ther 217: 127–132,1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bock KW “et al”. UDP-glucuronyl-transferase in perfused rat liver and in microsomes. Effects of CCl4 injury. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 296:199–206, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shull HJ “et al”. Normal disposition of oxazepam in acute viral hepatitis and cirrhosis. Ann Intern Med 84:420–425, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kraus JW “et al”. Effects of age and liver diseases on disposition of lorazepam. Clin Pharmacol Ther 24:411–419, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Desmond PV “et al”. Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer benzodiazepines. Clin Pharmacokinet 8:223–252, 1983.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Forrest JAH “et al”. Antipyrine, paracetamol and lignocaine elimination in chronic liver disease. Brit Med J 28:1384–1387, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 28a.
    Sonne et al: Glucuronidation of oxasepan is not spared in patients with hepatic encephalopaty.Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    Hoyumpa AM “et al”. Effects of liver disease on the disposition of ciramadol in humans. J Clin Pharmacol 29:217–224, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 30.
    Hoyumpa AM “et al”. Effect of cirrhosis on the disposition of dezocine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 41:226, 1987 (abtract).Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    Patwardhan RV “et al”. Normal metabolism of morphine in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 81:1006–1012, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 32.
    Witassek F “et al”. Abnormal glucuronidation of zomepi rac in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Hepatology 3:415–422, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 33.
    Smith PC “et al”. Effect of probenecid on the formation and elimination of acyl glucuronides: studies with zomepirac. Clin Pharmacol Ther 38:121–127, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 34.
    Jacqz E “et al”. Extrahepatic glucuronidation of morphine in the dog. Drug Metab Disp 14:627–630, 1986.Google Scholar
  36. 34a.
    Hoyumpa A.M. and Schenkers.: Is glucuronidation truly preserved in patients with liver disease? Hepatology (in press).Google Scholar
  37. 35.
    Mitchell MC “et al”. Zonal distribution of paracetamol glucuronidation in isolated perfused rat liver. Zenobiotica 19:389–400, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 36.
    Du Souich P “et al”. Metabolism of procainamide and pamino-benzoic acid in patients with chronic liver disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther 22:588, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 37.
    Levi AJ “et al”. Phenylbutazone and isoniazid metabolism with chronic liver disease in relation to previous drug therapy. Lancet 1:275, 1968.Google Scholar
  40. 38.
    Roberts R “et al”. Effect of age and parenchymal liver disease on the disposition and elimination of chlordiazepoxide (Librium®). Gastroenterology 75:479–485, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 39.
    Klotz U “et al”. The effects of age and liver disease on the disposition and elimination of diazepam in adult man. J Clin Invest 55: 347, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 40.
    Juhl RP “et al”. Alprazolam pharmacokinetics in alcoholic liver disease. J Clin Pharmacol 24:113–119, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 41.
    Mawer GE “et al”. Metabolism of amobarbitone in patients with chronic liver disease. Brit J Pharmacol 44:549,1972.Google Scholar
  44. 42.
    Zilly W “et al”. Hexobarbital plasma spiegel gei patienten mit akuter hepatitis wahrend kontinuirlicher hexobarbital-infusion. Klin Wochenschr 51:346, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 43.
    Richter VE “et al”. Metabolism von hexobarbital bei hepatitis und zirrhose. Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie 15:381, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 44.
    Ossenberg FW “et al”. Pentobarbital pharmacokinetics in cirrhosis. Digestion 8:448, 1973.Google Scholar
  47. 45.
    Alvin J “et al”. The effect of liver disease in man on the disposition of phenobarbital. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 192:224, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 46.
    Dahl SG “et al”. Pharmacokinetics of chlorpromazine after single and chronic dosage. Clin Pharmacol Ther 21:437, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 47.
    Meredith CG “et al”. Diphenhydramine disposition in chronic liver disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther 35:474–479, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 48.
    Held H “et al”. Der abbau von pentobarbital bei leberschaden. Klin Wochenschr 48:565, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 49.
    Roberts MS “et al”. Pharmacokinetics of aspirin and salicylate in elderly subjects and in patients with alcoholic liver disease. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 25:253–261, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 50.
    Neal EA “et al”. Enhanced bioavailability and decreased clearance of analgesics in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 27:96, 1979.Google Scholar
  53. 51.
    Juhl RP “et al”. Ibuprofen and sulindac kinetics in alcoholic liver disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther 34:104–109, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 52.
    Upton RA “et al”. Naproxen disposition in cirrhosis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 31:216–211, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 53.
    Laffi G “et al”. Effects of sulindac and ibuprofen in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Gastroenterology 90:182–187, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 54.
    Klotz U “et al”. The effect of cirrhosis on the disposition and elimination of meperidine in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 16:667, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 55.
    Novick D “et al”. Methadone disposition in maintained patients with chronic liver disease. Clin Res 28:622A, 1980Google Scholar
  58. 56.
    Maxwell JD “et al”. Plasma disappearance and cerebral effects of chlorpromazine in cirrhosis. Clin Sci 43:143–151, 1972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 57.
    Murray-Lyon NM “et al”. Clinical and electroencephalographic assessment of diazepam in liver disease. Brit Med J 4:265–266, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 58.
    Naranjo CA “et al”. An intensive drug monitoring study suggesting possible clinical irrelevance of impaired drug disposition in liver disease. Brit J Clin Pharmacol 15:451–458, 1983.Google Scholar
  61. 59.
    Laidlaw AE “et al”. Morphine tolerance in hepatic cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 40:389–399, 1961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 60.
    Macgilchrist AJ “et al”. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous midazolam in patients with severe alcoholic cirrhosis. Gut 27:190–195, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 61.
    Branch RA “et al”. Intravenous administration of diazepam in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut 17:975–983, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 62.
    Bakti G “et al”. Mechanism of the excessive sedative response of cirrhotics to benzodiazepines: model experiments with triazolam. Hepatology 7:629–638, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 63.
    Morgan MH “et al”. Antidepressants and liver disease. Gut 13:697–701, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 64.
    Hoyumpa AM “et al”. Perspectives in hepatic encephalopathy. J Lab Clin Med 100:477–478, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 65.
    Horwitz M “et al”. Blood/brain barrier changes in acute hepatic encephalopathy. Pediatr Res 15:706, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 66.
    Livingstone AS “et al”. Changes in the blood/brain barrier in hepatic coma after hepatectomy in the rat. Gastroenterology 73:697–704, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 67.
    Herlin PM “et al”. The blood/brain barrier is intact eighteen hours after total hepatectomy. Hepatology 1:515, 1981.Google Scholar
  70. 68.
    Traber PG “et al”. Electron microscopic evaluation of brain edema in rabbits with galactosamine-induced fulminant hepatic failure: ultrastructure and integrity of the blood/brain barrier. Hepatology 7:1272–1277, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 69.
    Lo WD “et al”. The effects of galactosamine-induced hepatic failure upon blood/brain barrier permeability. Hepatology 7:452–456, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 70.
    Dubey RK “et al”. Plasma binding and transport of diazepam across the blood/brain barrier: no evidence for in vivo enhanced dissociation. J Clin Invest 84:1155–1159, 1989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 71.
    Schafer DF “et al”. Hepatic encephalopathy and the gamma-aminobutyric acid neurotransmitter system. Lancet 1:18– 20, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 72.
    Hoyumpa AM. The unfolding GABA story. Hepatology 6:1042–1044, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 73.
    Schenker S. Hepatic encephalopathy: the present and the future. In: Hepatic Encephalopathy. Butterworth RF and Layargues GP (Eds.). Humana Press, 1989, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
  76. 74.
    Maddison JE “et al”. Plasma GABA, GABA-like activity and the brain GABA-benzodiazepine receptor complex in rats with chronic hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology 7:621–628, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 75.
    Maddison JE “et al”. Brain gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor binding is normal in rats with thioacetamide-induced hepatic encephalopathy despite elevated plasma gamma-aminobutyric acid-like activity. Gastroenterology 93:1062–1068, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 76.
    Moroni F “et al”. Hepatic encephalopathy: lack of changes of gamma-aminobutyric acid content in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. Hepatology 7:816–820, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 77.
    Butterworth RF “et al”. Affinities and densities of highaffinity [3H]muscimol (GABA-A) binding sites and of central benzodiazepine receptors are unchanged in autopsied brain tissue from cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology 8:1084–1088, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 78.
    Schafer DF. Hepatic coma: studies on the target organ. Gastroenterology 93:1131–1134, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 79.
    Bassett ML “et al”. Amelioration of hepatic encephalopathy by pharmacologic antagonism of the GABA-A-benzodiazepine receptor complex in a rabbit model of fulminant hepatic failure. Gastroenerology 93:1069–1077, 1987.Google Scholar
  82. 80.
    Butterworth RF “et al”. Peripheral-type benzodiazepine binding sites are increased in brains of cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology 10:619, 1989.Google Scholar
  83. 81.
    Mullen KD “et al”. Could an endogenous benzodiazepine ligand contribute to hepatic encephalopathy? Lancet l:457–459, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 82.
    Unseld E “et al”. Endogenous benzodiazepines in brain: right or wrong? Trends Neurosci 11:490, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 83.
    Samson Y “et al”. Cerebral uptake of benzodiazepine measured by positron emision tomography in hepatic encephalopathy. N Engl J Med 316:414–415, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 84.
    Stephenson FA. Benzodiazepines in the brain. Trends Neurosci 10:185–186, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 85.
    Sangameswaran L “et al”. Purification of a benzodiazepine from bovine brain and detection of benzodiazepine-like immunoreactivity in human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 83:9236–9240, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 86.
    Grim G “et al”. Improvement of hepatic encephalopathy treated with flumazenil. Lancet 2:1392–1394, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 87.
    Ferenci P “et al”. Successful long-term treatment of portal-systemic encephalopathy by the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil. Gastroenterology 96:240–243, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 88.
    Bansky G “et al”. Effects of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist flumazenil in hepatic encephalopathy in humans. Gastroenterology 97:744–750, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 89.
    Van der Rijt CCD “et al”. Flumazenil therapy for hepatic encephalopathy: a double blind cross-over study. Hepatology 10:590, 1989.Google Scholar
  92. 90.
    Klotz U “et al”. Flumazenil and hepatic encephalopathy. Lancet 1:155–156, 1989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 91.
    Pomier-Layrargues G “et al”. Pharmacokinetics of benzodiazepine and agonist R015–1788 in cirhotic patients with moderate or severe liver dysfunction. Hepatology 10: 1989 (in press, December issue).Google Scholar
  94. 92.
    Oellerich M “et al”. Lignocaine metabolite formation as a measure of pretransplant liver function. Lancet 1:640–642, 1989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 93.
    Schroeder TJ “et al”. Lidocaine metabolism as an index of liver function in hepatic transplant donors and recipients. Transpl Proceed 21:2299–2301, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Schenker
    • 1
  • Anastacio M. Hoyumpa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology and NutritionThe University of Texas Health Science CenterSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations