Relativistic Atomic Structure Calculations II: Computational Aspects of the Finite Basis Set Method

  • Harry Quiney


In the first of these lectures, we examined the basic theory of relativistic electronic structure calculations. The principal computational requirement in the determination of Dirac spinors within the Dirac—Hartree—Fock (DHF) approximation involves the solution of coupled first—order integro—differential equations. The traditional approach employs the finite—difference techniques introduced by Hartree in the calculation of non—relativistic self—consistent fields. The scheme is highly accurate and has been implemented by hand, on mechanical calculators and on electronic computers, for which many FORTRAN programs have been published. The first successful relativistic mean—field calculation using the finite—difference approximation, but which approximated the exchange potential, was performed by Williams in 1940. Today, a number of sophisticated programs are freely available as black—box atomic structure models which perform self—consistent field and multi—configurational calculations, but which are are not suited ideally to the calculation of relativistic many—body effects and which do not exhibit a computational structure which is compatible with the architecture of supercomputing machines.


Reference Orbital Master File Scalar Code Incomplete Beta Function Angular Quantum Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. M. Abramowitz, I Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover Publications (seventh edition, 1970 )Google Scholar
  2. G. Breit, Phys.Rev., 34, 553 (1929)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. C.G. Darwin, Phil Mag, 39, 537 (1920)Google Scholar
  4. P.A.M. Dirac, Proc.Roy.SocLondon, A117, 610 (1928)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. P.A.M. Dirac, Proc.Roy.Soc (London), A118, 351 (1928)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. I.P. Grant and H.M. Quiney, Adv.At.Mol.Phys, 23, 37 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Y.K. Kim, Phys.Rev., 154, 17 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. W. Kutzelnigg, Int.Journ.Quant.Chem., 25, 107 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. I. Lindgren and J. Morrison, Atomic Many—Body Theory, Springer—Verlag (1982)Google Scholar
  10. W. Press, B. Flannery, S. Teukolsky and W. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes, Cambridge University Press (1986)Google Scholar
  11. H.M. Quiney, I.P. Grant and S. Wilson, J.Phys.B, 20, 1413 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. H.M. Quiney, I.P. Grant and S. Wilson, Lecture Notes in Chemistry 52, 307, edited by U.Kaldor, Springer—Verlag (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. H.M. Quiney, Meth.Comp.Chem., 2, 227 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Swirles, Proc.Roy.Soc (London), A152, 625 (1935)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Synek, Phys.Rev., 136, 1556 (1964)Google Scholar
  16. A.D. Williams, Phys.Rev., 58, 723 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry Quiney
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Theoretical ChemistryUnversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations