Computational Implementation of the R—Matrix Method in Atomic and Molecular Collision Problems

  • K. A. Berrington


Whilst working on a contract for the Manhatten Project, Wigner and Eisenbud (1947) published a new theoretical method for interpreting resonances which had been observed in nuclear reactions. These resonances could be explained in terms of a compound nucleus interaction, in which the colliding nuclei “stick” temporarily in a compound state; the total wavefunction can therefore be expanded in a set of such states, and a many—body problem solved using nuclear structure techniques. This reaction zone was labelled the “internal region” of configuration space and delineated by a sphere of radius r = a around the scattering centre. In the “external region” however, where the colliding or separating nuclei are further apart, the system reduces to a two—body problem, the interaction being a simple function of the radial separation r. In order to connect the two regions, Wigner and Eisenbud introduced a matrix, which they called curly R, to relate the wavefunction to its derivative on the boundary r = a. Thus was R—matrix theory born.


Collision Cross Section External Region Hamiltonian Matrix Spin Integral Radial Integral 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bar-Shalom, A. and Klapisch, M., 1988, Comp. Phys. Commun. 50, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berrington, K. A. Burke, P. G., le Dourneuf, M., Robb, W. D., Taylor, K. T. and Vo KyLan, 1978, Comp. Phys. Commun., 14, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berrington, K. A., Burke, P. G., Butler, K., Seaton, M. J., Storey, P.J., Taylor, K. T. and Yu Yan, 1987, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys., 20, 6379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burke. P. G., Hibbert, A. and Robb, W. D., 1971, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys., 4, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke, P. G. and Robb, W. D., 1975, Adv. in Atom. Molec. Phys., 11, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke, P. G., Noble, C. J. and Scott, M. P., 1987, Proc. R. Soc. A. 410, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Norrington, P. H. and Grant, I. P., 1981, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 14, L261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Scott, N. S. and Burke P. G., 1980, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 13, 4299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Scott, N. S. and Taylor, K. T., 1982, Comp. Phys. Commun. 25, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wigner, E. P. and Eisenbud, L., 1947, Phys. Rev. 72, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. A. Berrington
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical PhysicsQueen’s University BelfastUK

Personalised recommendations