Advertisement

Flow Cytometry as a Technique to Monitor the Effects of Environmental Genotoxins on Wildlife Populations

  • John W. Bickham
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 38)

Abstract

A critical environmental issue facing society is the problem of toxic waste disposal. The escape of toxins into the environment has resulted in local (e.g., Love Canal) or regional (e.g., Chernobyl) human health problems. The threat to human health posed by such pollution is profound, including both short-term and long-term effects. Environmental mutagens can cause somatic mutations that result in cancer or germ cell mutations that lead to impaired fertility or birth defects. Heritable mutations can affect levels of genetic polymorphism and evolutionary processes. Thus, the effects of exposure to such contaminants might be expressed years after the immediate problem has been resolved. Indeed, future generations as well as ourselves are at risk. Therefore, the detection of environmental mutagens, and the development of techniques to accomplish this, should be a high research priority for both health-related and environmental-related agencies. The primary focus of the author’s laboratory has been the comparative cytogenetics and population genetics of various wildlife species. Investigations into vertebrate chromosomal evolution have led to an interest in mutagenesis and the role that environmental mutagens play in ecological and evolutionary processes.

Keywords

Polluted Site Environmental Mutagen Slider Turtle Germ Cell Mutation Petrochemical Waste 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atlas, E.L., Donnelly, K.C., Giam, C.S., and McFarland, A.R., 1985, Chemical and biological characterization of emissions from a fíreperson training facility, Am. Ind. Hag. Assoc. J., 46: 532–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, R.J., and Bickham, J.W., 1980, Karyotypic evolution in bats: evidence of extensive and conservative evolution in closely related taxa, Syst. Zool., 29: 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, R.J., Haiduk, M.W., Robbins, L.W., Cadena, A., and Koop, B.F., 1982, Chromosomal studies of South American bats and their systematic implications, in: “Mammalian Biology in South America,” M.A. Mares, and H.H. Genoways, eds., Spec. Publ. Ser., Pymatuning Lab. Ecol. VI:3O3–327.Google Scholar
  4. Bickham, J.W., 1979, Chromosomal variation and evolutionary relationships of vespertilionid bats (Mammalia: Chíroptera), J. Mammal., 60: 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickham, J.W., 1981, 200 million year old chromosomes: Deceleration of the rates of karyotypic evolution in turtles, Science, 212: 1291–1293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickham, J.W., Hanks, B.G., Smolen, M.J., Lamb, T., and Gibbons, J.W., 1988, Flow cytometric analysis of low level radiation on a natural population of turtles ( Pseudemys scripta ), Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 17: 837–841.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bickham, J.W., McBee, K., and Schlitter, D.A., 1986, Chromosomal variation among seven species of Myotis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), J. Mammal., 67: 746–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, K.W., 1980, Final report to the Firemen’s Training School of the Texas Engineering Extension Service. A plan to minimize the volume of runoff water which must be treated and disposed of and an assessment of the feasibility of land disposal of the runoff water and sludge. Soil and Crop Sciences Dept., Texas A M University, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, K.W., and Donnelly, K.C., 1982, Mutagenic potential of water concentrates from the effluent of a waste oil storage pond, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 28: 424–429.Google Scholar
  10. Deaven, L.L., 1982, Application of flow cytometry to cytogenetic testing of environmental mutagens, in: “Cytogenetíc Assays of Environmental Mutagens,” T.C. Hsu, ed., p. 325–351, Allanheld, Osmun and Company, Publishers, Totowa, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  11. Gibbons, J.W., and Semlítsch, R.D., 1982, Survivorship and longevity of a long-lived vertebrate species: how long do turtles live? J. Anim. Ecol., 51: 523–527.Google Scholar
  12. Greenbaum, I.F., Hale, D.W., and Fuxa, K.P., 1986, Synaptic adaptation in deer mice: a cellular mechanism for karyotypic orthoselection, Evolution, 40: 208–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heddle, J.A., 1973, A rapid in vivo test for chromosomal damage, Mutat. Res., 18: 187–190.Google Scholar
  14. Hsu, T.C., 1983, Genetic instability in the human population: A working hypothesis, Hereditas, 98: 1–9.Google Scholar
  15. Hsu, T.C., 1986, Genetic susceptibility to carcinogenesis, Cancer Bull., 38: 125–128.Google Scholar
  16. Hsu, T.C., Au, W.W., Strong, L.C., and Johnson, D.A., 1981, A short-term cytogenetic test for genetic instability in humans, p.217–235, in: “Short-term Tests for Chemical Mutagens,” H. Stich, and R.H.C. Sans, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Hsu, T.C., Cherry, L.M., and Samaan, N.A., 1985, Differential mutagen susceptibility in cultured lymphocytes of normal individuals and cancer patients, Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 17: 307–313.Google Scholar
  18. Lamb, T., Bíckham, J.W., Gibbons, J.W., Smolen, M.J., and McDowell, S., 1989, Genetic damage in a population of slider turtles (Trachemys scripta) inhabiting a radioactive reservoir (submitted).Google Scholar
  19. Lee, M.R., and Elder, F.F.B., 1980, Yeast stimulation of bone marrow mitosis for cytogenetic investigations, Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 26: 36–40.Google Scholar
  20. McBee, K., 1985, Chromosomal aberrations in resident small mammals at a petrochemical waste dump site: a natural model for analysis of environmental mutagenesis, Unpublished Ph.D. diss., Texas AM University, College Station.Google Scholar
  21. McBee, K., and Bickham, J.W., 1988, Petrochemical related DNA damage in wild rodents detected by flow cytometry, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 40: 343–349.Google Scholar
  22. McBee, K., and Bickham, J.W., 1989, Mammals as bioindicators of environmental toxicity, in: “Current Mammalogy,” Vol. 2., H.H. Genoways, ed., Plenum, New York, pp. 37–88.Google Scholar
  23. McBee, K., Bickham, J.W., Donnelly, K.C., and Brown, K.W., 1987, Chromosomal aberrations in native small mammals (Peromyscus leucopus and Sigmodon hispidus) at a petrochemical waste disposal site, I. Standard karyology, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 16: 681–688.Google Scholar
  24. Otto, F.J., Oldiges, H., Gohde, W., and Jain, V.K., 1981, Flow cytometric measurement of nuclear DNA content variations as a potential in vivo mutagenicity test, Cytometry, 2: 189–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Preston, R.J., Au, W., Bender, M.A., Brewen, J.G., Carrano, A.V., Heddle, J.A., McFee, A.F., Wolff, S., and Wassom, J.S., 1981, Mammalian in vivo and in vitro cytogenetic assays: A report of the U.S. EPA’s Gene-Tox program, Mutat. Res., 87: 143–188.Google Scholar
  26. Rutledge, J.C., Cain, K.T., Cacheiro, N.L.A., Cornett, C.V., Wright, C.G., and Generoso, W.M., 1986, A balanced translocation in mice with a neurological defect, Science, 231: 395–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sawin, V.L., McBee, K., and Bickham, J.W., 1987a, Flow cytometry as a screen for in vivo clastogenicity: effects in various tissues, Environmental Mutagen Society Annual Meeting, (abstract).Google Scholar
  28. Sawin, V.L., McBee, K., and Bickham, J.W., 1987b, Flow cytometry as a screen for in vivo clastogenicity: response with time. Environmental Mutagen Society Annual Meeting, (abstract).Google Scholar
  29. Schmid, W., 1975, The micronucleus test. Mutat. Res., 31:9–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Steen, H.D., and Lindmo, T., 1979, Flow cytometry: a high-resolution instrument for everyone, Science, 204: 403–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yosida, T.H., and Parida, B.B., 1980, Karyotype evolution, species differentiation and environmental mutagen, Proc. Jpn Acad., 56: 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • John W. Bickham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Wildlife and Fisheries SciencesTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations