Advertisement

The Use of Drosophila Melanogaster for In Situ Biomonitoring

  • Lawrence G. Harshman
  • Bruce D. Hammock
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 38)

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster was the principal organism used for the development of diploid transmission genetics at the beginning of the century and more recently has been the subject of pivotal studies on eucaryote gene regulation, development and behavior. D. melanogaster is potentially valuable for in situ biomonitoring because it is convenient to test different life stages, it can be used for a multi-faceted analysis of environmental genotoxins and a rapidly expanding base of information on its molecular genetics facilitates the development of new methods for bioassays.

Keywords

Insecticide Resistance Mutation Test Chemical Mutagen Human Health Hazard Counting Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, S.K., Goswami, V. and Kesavan, P.C., 1979, Mutagenicity of inhaled diethyl sulfate vapour in Drosophila melanogaster and its implications for the utility of the system for screening air pollutants, Mut. Res. 66: 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrahamson, S. and Lewis, E.B., 1971, The detection of mutations in Drosophila melanogaster, In: “Chemical Mutagens, Vol. 2,” A. Hollaender (ed.), Plenum Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  3. Borkovec, A.B., 1973, Insect chemosterilants as mutagens, In: “Chemical Mutagens, Vol. 3,” A. Hollaender (ed.), Plenum Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  4. Green, M.M., Todo, T., Ryo, N. and Fujikawa, K., 1986, Genetic-molecular basis for a simple Drosophila melanogaster somatic system that detects environmental mutagens, P.N.A.S. 83: 6667–6671.Google Scholar
  5. Harshman, L.G., Ottea, J.A. and Hammock, B.D., Environment-dependent expression of detoxication enzyme activity in a Drosophila melanogaster selection experiment, Evolution submitted manuscript.Google Scholar
  6. Harshman, L.G., Green, M.M., MacKay, W., Bewley, G. and Edlin, G., Relative survival of catalase deficient genotypes on irradiated Drosophila food, Drosophila Information Service, submitted manuscript.Google Scholar
  7. Hayes, W.J., 1968, Toxicological aspects of chemosterilants, In: “Principles of Insect Chemosterilization,” G.C. Labrecque and C.N. Smith (eds.), Appleton-Century-Crafts, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Jones, P.B.C., Galeazzi, D.R., Fisher, J.M. and Whitlock, J.P., 1985, Control of cytochrome P1–450 gene expression by dioxin, Science 227:1499–1502.Google Scholar
  9. Pereira, M.A., 1983, International symposium on tumor production, Envir. Health Perspect. 50:3–370.Google Scholar
  10. Roberts, D.B., 1986, Basic Drosophila care and techniques, In: “Drosophila, A Practical Approach,” D.B. Roberts (ed.), IRL Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  11. Sankaranarayanan, K., 1979, The role of non-disjunction in aneuploidy in man: An overview, Mut. Res. 61: 1–28.Google Scholar
  12. Shakarnis, V.F., 1969, Induction of X chromosome non-disjunction and recessive sex-linked mutations in females of Drosophila melanogaster by 1,2-dichloroethane, Sov. Genet 5: 1666–1671.Google Scholar
  13. Valencia, R., Abrahamson, S., Lee, W.R., Von Halle, E.S., Woodruff, R.C., Wurgler, F.E. and Simmering, S., 1984, Chromosome mutation tests for mutagenesis in Drosophila melanogaster, Mut. Res. 134: 61–88.Google Scholar
  14. Verburgt, F.G. and Vogel, E., 1977, Vinyl chloride mutagenesis in Drosophila melanogaster, Mut. Res. 48: 327–336.Google Scholar
  15. Vogel, E. and Sobels, F.N., 1976, The function of Drosophila in genetic toxicology testing, In:“Chemical Mutagens, Vol. 4,” A. Hollaender (ed.), Plenum Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  16. Zimmering, S. and Kammermeyer, K.L., 1983, Comparison of excision repair-deficient mei-9 and mus 201 females in the test for paternal sex chromosome loss in Drosophila with procarbazine and diethylnitrosamine (DEN), Environ. Mutagen. 5:235–237.Google Scholar
  17. Zimmering, S., Mason, J.M. and Osgood, C., 1986, Current status of aneuploidy testing in Drosophila, Mut. Res. 167: 71–87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence G. Harshman
    • 1
  • Bruce D. Hammock
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Entomology and Department of GeneticsUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Burroughs Wellcome Toxicology Scholar Department of Entomology and Department of Environmental ToxicologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations