Advertisement

Inequalities, Western Roots and Implementation Problems: Three Challenges to a One World Planning Education

  • Farokh Afshar
Part of the Urban Innovation Abroad book series (UIA)

Abstract

International planning education in the West, and international students’ attitudes to this education have undergone three phases in recent decades. The first was a ‘West Best’ phase; the West was supposed to know best and therefore taught “Western ways” to international students. Separate programs or courses for international students were not considered necessary. When these “Western ways” appeared inappropriate to countries of the South, a “South best” reaction followed. Problems and solutions for such countries appeared so different from those in the West that separate programs were set up to teach about such countries[1].

Keywords

International Student Planning Education Planning Theory Mutual Learning Implementation Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afshar, F. (1982) “Pesantren in Java: Local Institutions and Rural Development” in The Changing Rural Habitat, Concept Media, Singapore.Google Scholar
  2. Afshar, F. (1985) “The Political Economy of Technology Choice: Construction and Materials Production in Pakistan”. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  3. Amirahmadi, H. ed. (1988) Post-Revolutionary Iran, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  4. Bunce, M. and M. J. Troughtoned. (1984) The Pressures of Change in Rural Canada, Geographical Monographs No. 14, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  5. Cain, A., F. Afshar, J. Norton (1975) “Indigenous Building and the Third World”, Architectural Design, Vol. XIV, April 1975, pp. 207–220.Google Scholar
  6. Conyers, D. and P. Hills (1984) An Introduction to Development Planning in the Third World, John Wiley & Sons, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  7. Escobar, A. (1984) “Discourse and Power in Development: Michel Foucault and the Relevance of His Work to the Third World”, Alternatives X (1984) pp. 377–400.Google Scholar
  8. Fathy, H. (1973) Architecture for the Poor: An Experiment in Rural Egypt, University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Friedmann, J. (1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  10. Harrison, P. (1987) The Greening of Africa: Breaking Through in the Battle for Land and Food, Paladin Grafton Books, London, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Holdroft, L. E. (1986) “The Rise and Fall of Community Development 1950–65: A Critical Assessment”, Eicher, G. K. and J. M. Stoatz (eds) Agricultural Development in the Third World, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, pp. 46–58.Google Scholar
  12. Hostetier, J. A., and G. E. Huntington (1980) The Hutterites in North America, Holt Rheinhart & Winston, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  13. McGee, T. (1989) “Southeast Asian Urbanization: Three Decades of Change”, Asia Horizon, Asian Pacific Studies Newsletter, Vol. XI, No. 2.Google Scholar
  14. Pradervand, P. (1988) “Listening to Africa”, forthcoming, reported in Christian Science Monitor, May 2–5, 1988.Google Scholar
  15. Said, E. (1978) Orientalism, Vintage Books, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Stern, R. (1986) “The Realization of African Cities”, Institute of Environmental Studies, Working Paper, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  17. Stohr, W. and F. Todtling (1978) An Evaluation of Regional Policies: Experiences in Market and Mixed Economies in Hansen, N. (ed.) Human Settlement Systems, Ballinger Press, Mass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farokh Afshar
    • 1
  1. 1.University of GuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations