Third World City Design: Values, Models and Education

  • Tridib Banerjee
Part of the Urban Innovation Abroad book series (UIA)


The community of academics and professionals interested in Third World development and planning consists of three types of people: those who are “Westerners” by birth and training, who, while based in the West, are interested in the problems of developing countries; those who are “Third Worlders” by birth (with training from home countries or abroad) and have remained in their native settings to pursue a career in planning and development; and the Third World expatriates with advanced training in the West who have chosen a Western “base” for career development, but who remain vitally interested in the problems of the developing countries.


Urban Form Urban Design Design Education Traditional Sector Design Studio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amin, S., 1972, “Accumulation on a World Scale: A Critique of the Theory of Underdevelopment,” 2 vols., Monthly Review Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Augustinus, Saint, 1963, “The City of God,” Catholic University Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Appleyard, D., and Jacobs, A., 1987, Toward an urban design manifesto, Journal of the American Planning Association, 53:112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, D., and McGee, T., 1985, “Theaters of Accumulation: Studies in Asian and Latin American Urbanization,” Methuen, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Alexander, C., 1964, “Notes on the Synthesis of Form,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Banerjee, T., 1985, Development and design: Some thoughts on design education for the Third World, Journal of the Planning Education and Research, 5 (1):28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banerjee, T., and Baer, W.C., 1984, “Beyond the Neighborhood Unit: Residential Environments and Public Policy,” Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Blomstrom, M., and Hettne, B. 1984, “Development Theory in Transition,” Zed Books Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  9. Blau, J.R., La Gory, M., and Pipkin, J., 1983, “Professionals and Urban Form,” State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  10. Cuff, D., 1988, The design discrepancy: Actions and beliefs in contemporary architectural practice, Environment and Behavior, in press.Google Scholar
  11. Cullen, G., 1961, “Townscape,” Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Dyckman, J., Kreditor, A., and Banerjee, T., 1984, Planning in an unprepared environment, Town Planning Review, 54:214–227.Google Scholar
  13. Epstein, D.G., 1973, “Brasilia, Plan and Reality: A Study of Planned and Spontaneous Urban Settlement,” University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  14. Evenson, N., 1973, “Two Brazilian Capitals: Architectures and Urbanism in Rio de Janeiro and Brasilia,” Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  15. Frank, A.G., 1966, The development of underdevelopment, Monthly Review, 18:17–31.Google Scholar
  16. Gastil, R., 1981, The comparative swing of freedom — the ninth year, Freedom at Issue, 59:3–18.Google Scholar
  17. Geertz, C., 1963, “Peddlers and Princes: Social Development and Economic Change in Two Indonesian Towns,” University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  18. Hack, G., and Lynch, K., 1984, “Site Planning,” MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Jacobs, A., 1984, “By Looking,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. King, A., 1976, “Colonial Urban Development: Culture, Social Power and Environment,” Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  21. Kitchen, P., 1975, “A Most Unsettling Person: The Life and Ideas of Patrick Geddes,” Saturday Review Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Larson, M.S., 1983, Emblem and exception: The historical definition of the architect’s professional role, in: J.R. Blau, M.E. La Gory, and J.S. Pipkin, eds., “Professional and Urban Form,” State University of New York Press, Albany pp.49–86.Google Scholar
  23. Lynch, K., 1980, “Good City Form,” MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  24. Lynch, K., 1979, Some thoughts on teaching city design, paper presented at the Colloquium on Urban Design Education at the University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  25. Manheim, M., 1967, Problem solving processes in planning and design, in: M. Krampen and P. Seitz, eds., “Design and Planning 2,” Hastings House, New York, pp. 31–39.Google Scholar
  26. Manheim, M., 1971, “Community Values in Highway Location and Design: A Procedural Guide,” MIT Urban Systems Laboratory, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  27. McGee, T., 1971, “The Urbanization Process in the Third World: Exploration in Search of a Theory,” Bell, London.Google Scholar
  28. Meadows, P., 1983, Cities and professionals, in: J.R. Blau, M.E. La Gory, and J.S. Pipkin, eds. “Professionals and Urban Form,” State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 15–48.Google Scholar
  29. Richardson, J., 1986, Teaching urban design in cross-cultural settings: The Beijing urban design studio, paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  30. Roweis, S., 1978, “The Internationalization of Technocracy: A Case Study of the Cognitive Impacts of US Graduate Planning Education on Foreign Students,” MIT, Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
  31. Rodwin, L., ed., 1987, “Shelter, Settlement, and Development,” Allen and Unwin, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  32. Santos, M., 1979, “The Shared Space: Two Circuits of the Urban Economy in Underdeveloped Countries,” Methuen, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Schoeffler, S., 1954, Toward a general definition of rational action, Kyklos, 7:245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schon, D., 1983, “The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action,” Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Simon, H., 1957, “Models of Man,” Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Tyrwhitt, J., 1947, “Patrick Geddes in India,” L. Humphries, London.Google Scholar
  37. White, M., and White, L., 1962, “The Intellectual Versus the City, from Thomas Jefferson to Frank Lloyd Wright,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  38. Whyte, A. V. T., 1977, “Guidelines for Field Studies in Environmental Perception,” UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tridib Banerjee
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations