Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation of Cementite in Steel and White Cast Iron by Ferromagnetic Parameters

  • I. Altpeter
  • P. Holler
Part of the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation book series


The change in the microstructure state (lattice defects, especially dislocations, precipitations and thus the stress fields) with the addition of alloying elements plays an important role for the strength and the toughness of a material. In order to determine these microstructural parameters, up to now the electron microscopy and similar methods are used. X-ray methods are normally used to determine residual stresses.


Coercive Force Ferrite Matrix Residual Stress Field White Cast Iron Microstructure State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Herz, K., Kuppler, D., Deimel, P., Theiner, W., Bestimmung der Mikrogefuge von Druckehalterstahlen mit magnetisch induzierten MeBgroBen. Proj. - Nr. 150, 334, 3. Zwischenbericht der MPA-Stuttgart 1981.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, L. M., Ham, R. K., Dislocation - Particle Interactions in, Strengthening Methods in Crystals. Hrsg., Kelly, A., Nicholson, R. B., Appl. Sci. Publ. LTD London 1971.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ron, M., Iron-carbon and iron-nitrogen systems in, Applications of Mossbauer spectroscopy edited by Cohen, (1980), S. 329.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faber, F., Hartmann, U., Quantitative rontgenographische Phasenanalyse am System, -Fe/ -Fe/Fe3C Harterei-Techn. Mitt. 28 (1973).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kretschmer, M. Schmolke, G., Koch, K. H., Phasenanalyse mikrolegierter Stahle, Hoesch Huttenwerke AG, ESTEL-Berichte aus Forschung and Entwicklung unserer Werke H. 2 (1975) 53.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Puskeppel, A., Harsdorff, M., Anwendung der quantitativen. Bildanalyse bei der Auswertung elektronenmikroskopischer Hellfeld-und Dunkelfeldaufnahmen in, IMANCO, Fortschritte der quantitativen Bildanalyse, (1975), S. 20.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dijkstra, L. J., Wert, C., Phys. Rev. 79, (1950), S. 979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kruger, F. D., Veit, P., Stoppe, H., Spektrale Auswertung von Barkhausenrauschsignalen, Wiss. Techn. Univ., “Otto von Guericke” Magdeburg 31 (1987) Heft 8, S. 1–1.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Altpeter, I., Kern, R., Holler, P., Einflub ferromagnetischer 2ter Phasen (Karbide) auf die Eigenspannungsmessung und Gefugecharakterisierung bei Nutzung magnetischer und magnetoelastischer MeBgroBen IzfP-Bericht Nr. 880324-TW.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seeger, A., Moderne Probleme der Metallphysik, Berlin - Heidelberg - New York, Springer Verlag (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Altpeter, I., Kern, R., Holler, P., Characterization of cementite in steel and white cast iron by micromagnetic nondestructive methods, Oktober (1988), 3rd International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials, 3, 6, October 1988, Saarbrucken.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laszlo, F., JISI 147 (1943) S. 173.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Theiner, W. A., Altpeter, I., Kern, R., Determination of sub-surface microstructure states by micromagnetic ndt, presented at the 2nd International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials, Montreal, Canada, July 1986.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kneller, E., Ferromagnetismus, Berlin, Springer Verlag (1962).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jellinghaus, W., Weitere Messungen zu den physikalischen Eigenschaften des Zementits. Archiv fur das Eisenhuttenwesen 38 (1967) S. 488.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Altpeter
    • 1
  • P. Holler
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer-Insitut fur Zerstorungsfreie Prufverfahren (IzfP)SaarbruckenGermany

Personalised recommendations