Use of Surface Skimming SH Waves to Measure Thermal and Residual Stresses in Installed Railroad Tracks

  • George A. Alers
  • Alfonso Manzanares
Part of the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation book series


The stress level in a material is usually measured with an electrical resistance strain gage attached permanently to the object. Such an approach actually yields only the change in stress when a load is applied and thus gives no information on the state of residual or thermal stresses that may be present in the unloaded material. X-ray methods can be made to yield absolute stress levels but they are time consuming and only give values characteristic of the first few microns of the surface layer. Elsewhere in this volume, several articles {1} can be found that describe magnetic methods that infer stress in steel from the magnetic field dependence of certain magnetic properties. Not only are these methods applicable only to steel but they suffer from the fact that they must be calibrated for the specific alloy being used and are based on experimentally established correlations between the stress and the particular quantity being measured. Ultrasonic techniques, on the other hand, are generally applicable to any material and are much less susceptible to uncertainties arising from the empirical tests used to calibrate them. However, like the electrical resistance strain gage, they are normally used to measure only relative changes in stress because the rolling textures that are often present in commercial structural materials introduce effects that cannot be distinguished from residual or thermal stresses.


Residual Stress Transit Time Angular Dependence Apparent Stress Acoustic Path 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti (Plenum Press, New York), Vol. 9 to be published (1989). See papers by D. C. Jiles, W. A. Theiner, P. Holler, G. L. Burkhardt, N. Namkung, L. J. Swartendruber, R. DeNale, J. F. Bussiere D. J. Buttle, D. Utrata.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. T. Smith, “Stress Induced Anisotropy in Solids,–The Acoustoelastic Effect”, Ultrasonics Magazine, pp. 135–147 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. E. MacDonald, “On Determining Stress and Strain and Texture Using Ultrasonic Wave Velocity Measurements,” IEEE Trans. Sonics and Ultrasonics, SU-28 #2, p. 75 (1981).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. B. Thompson, S. S. Lee, and J. F. Smith, “Microstructure Independent Acoustoelastic Measurement of Stress,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 44, pp. 296–98 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. M. Sayers, et al, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A, Vol. 320, pp. 187–200 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. B. Thompson, et al, “Angular Dependence of Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in a Stressed, Orthorhombic Continuum,” J. Acous. Soc. Am., Vol. 80, pp. 921–931 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. A. Alers and L. R. Burns, “EMAT Designs for Special Applications,” Materials Evaluation, Vol. 45, pp. 1184–1189 (1987).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. F. Vasile and R. B. Thompson, “Excitation of SH Waves by Electromagnetic Transducers with Periodic Permanent Magnets,” J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 50, pp. 2583–2588 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti (Plenum Press, New York), 1989 Vol. 8B, p. 1895; 1988 Vol. 7B, p. 1399.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. B. Thompson, “Ultrasonic Shear Wave Transducer,” Patent 4,295,214, issued October 13, 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • George A. Alers
    • 1
  • Alfonso Manzanares
    • 1
  1. 1.Magnasonics, Inc.AlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations