Tensile Overload and Stress Intensity Shielding Investigations by Ultrasound

  • D. K. Rehbein
  • L. VanWyk
  • R. B. Thompson
  • O. Buck
Part of the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation book series


Growth of a fatigue crack is modified according to the development of contacts between the crack faces [1,2] creating shielding, thus canceling a portion of the crack driving force. These contacts develop through a number of mechanisms, including plastic deformation, sliding of the faces with respect to each other and the collection of debris such as oxide particles [3]. Compressive stresses are created on either side of the partially contacting crack faces resulting in opening loads that must be overcome in order to apply a driving force at the crack tip. In this way, the crack tip is shielded from a portion of the applied load, thus creating the need for modification [1] of the applied stress intensity range from ΔK = KImax − KImin to ΔKeff = KImax − KIsh. Determination of the contact size and density in the region of closure from ultrasonic transmission and diffraction experiments [4] has allowed estimation of the magnitude of Kish on a crack grown under constant ΔK conditions. The calculation has since [5] been extended to fatigue cracks grown with a tensile overload block. The calculation was also successful in predicting the growth rate of the crack after reinitiation had occurred. This paper reports the further extension to the effects of a variable ΔK on fatigue crack growth. In addition, this paper presents preliminary results on detection of the tightly closed crack extension present during the growth retardation period after application of a tensile overload as well as an observation of the crack surface during reinitiation of growth that presents some interesting questions.


Fatigue Crack Fatigue Crack Growth Crack Opening Displacement Acoustic Response Paris Regime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. Elber, in Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, ASTM STP 486 (Am. Soc. Test. Mat., Philadelphia, PA), 230 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Q. Bowles and J. Schijve, in Fatigue Mechanisms-Advances in Quantitative Measurement of Physical Damage, ASTM STP 811 (Am. Soc. Test, Mat., Philadelphia, PA), 400 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Suresh and R. O. Ritchie, Scripta Met. 17, 595 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. Buck, D. K. Rehbein and R. B. Thompson, Eng. Frac. Mech. 28, 413 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. K. Rehbein, L. Van Wyk, R. B. Thompson and O. Buck, in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE 8B, edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, Plenum Press, New York and London, 1787 (1989).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. A. Auld, Wave Motion 1, 3 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.-M. Baik and R. B. Thompson, J. Nondes. Eval. 4, 177 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. B. Thompson, C. J. Fiedler and O. Buck, in Nondestructive Methods for Materials Property Determination, edited by C. O. Ruud and R. E. Green, Plenum Press, New York and London, 161 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. B. Thompson and C. J. Fiedler, in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE 3A, edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, Plenum Press, New York and London, 207 (1984).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. Buck, R. B. Thompson and D. K. Rehbein, J. Nondes. Eval. 4, 203 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. K. Rehbein, R. B. Thompsonad O. Buck, in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE 4A, edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, Plenum Press, New York and London, 61 (1985).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Kendall and D. Tabor, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A232, 231 (1971).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Welsch, D. Eifler, B. Scholtes and B. Maucherach, in Residual Stresses in Science and Technology, DGM Informationsgesellschaft Verlag, Oberursel, 785 (1987).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O. Buck, D. K. Rehbein, and R. B. Thompson, in Effects of Load and Thermal Histories on Mechanical Behavior of Materials, edited by P. K. Liaw and T. Nicholas, Met. Soc. of AIME, Warrendale, 49 (1987).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. M. VanWyk, A Study on Ultrasonic Detection and Characterization of Partially Closed Fatigue Cracks, M.S. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA (1989).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. O. Ritchie, Mat. Science, Eng., A103, 15 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. K. Rehbein
    • 1
  • L. VanWyk
    • 2
  • R. B. Thompson
    • 1
  • O. Buck
    • 1
  1. 1.Ames Laboratory USDOE and Materials Science and Engineering DepartmentIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Rocketdyne DivisionRockwell International CorporationCanoga ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations