Acoustical and Dynamic Mechanical Characterization of Fiber-Matrix Interface Bonds in Ceramic Composites

  • L. A. Lott
  • D. C. Kunerth
Part of the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation book series


Ceramic matrix composites presently being developed are potentially well suited for high temperature structural applications. The character of the fiber-matrix bond plays a significant role in determining the fracture toughness of the material and thus its performance. Increased toughness is achieved by phenomena such as interface debonding and fiber slip or pull-out, which improve material toughness by increasing the energy required to propagate a crack [1]. In a bond that is too weak, the toughening mechanisms are not significant. However, a bond that is too strong permits a crack to propagate directly through a fiber-matrix interface without being significantly affected, resulting in brittle fracture. As a result, care is required in the manufacture of these materials to achieve optimum fiber-matrix bonding [2]. The objective of this work is to develop and evaluate techniques to nondestructively characterize the fiber-matrix interface bonds. The techniques being investigated include ultrasonic velocity and attenuation, acousto-ultrasonic response, and internal dynamic mechanical damping.


Acoustic Emission Signal Ultrasonic Velocity Ceramic Matrix Composite Chemical Vapor Infiltration Weak Interface Bond 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. A. Lowden, D. P. Stinton, and T. M. Besmann, “Characterization of Fiber-Matrix Interfaces in Ceramic Composites,” Whisker and Fiber-Toughened Ceramics, ASM Conference Proceedings, 1988, pp. 253–264.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. J. Caputo, D. P. Stinton, R. A. Lowden, and T. M. Besmann, “Fiber-Reinforced SiC Composites with Improved Mechanical Properties,” Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 66 (2), (1987), pp. 368–372.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. A. Lowden, Characterization and Control of the Fiber-Matrix Interface in Ceramic Matrix Composites, ORNL/TM-11039 (March 1989).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Vary and K. J. Bowles, “An Ultrasonic-Acoustic Technique for Nondestructive Evaluation of Fiber Composite Quality,” Polymer Engineering and Science, 19, (1979), pp. 373–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. G. Henneke, II, J. C. Duke, Jr., and R. C. Stiffler, “Characterizing the Damage State of Composite Laminates Via the Acousto-Ultrasonic Technique,” Solid Mechanics Research for Quantitative Non-Destructive Evaluation (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987 ), pp. 217–235.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. N. Kishore, A. Gosh, and B. D. Agarwal, “Damping Characteristics of Fiber Composites with Imperfect Bonding: Parts I and II: Low and High Volume Fraction Composites,” J. Reinforced Plastics Composites, 1, (1982), pp. 40–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. L. Weaver, “Diffuse Field Decay Rates For Material Characterization,” Solid Mechanics Research for Quantitative Non-destructive Evaluation, edited by J. D. Achenbach and Y. Rajapaskie (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987 ), p. 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. A. Lott
    • 1
  • D. C. Kunerth
    • 1
  1. 1.Idaho National Engineering LaboratoryEG&G Idaho, Inc.Idaho FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations