Plant Aging pp 43-49 | Cite as

Development of Rejuvenation Methods for in Vitro Establishment, Multiplication and Rooting of Mature Trees

  • A. Ballester
  • M. C. Sánchez
  • M. C. San-José
  • F. J. Vieitez
  • A. M. Vieitez
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 186)


The utility of the micropropagation of forest trees is limited by the efficiency with which selected trees can be reproduced vegetatively. As is well known, there are several woodland species for which satisfactorily successfull establishment in vitro has still not been achieved, at least for adult trees. Juvenile trees are in general readily cloned by conventional techniques, but the ease of propagation of many trees tends to diminish as they approach a size sufficient to allow reliable evaluation of their crop potential (Bonga, 1987).


Mature Tree Quercus Robur Juvenile Tree Epicormic Shoot Stump Sprout 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, W.C., 1984, A revised tissue culture medium for shoot multiplication of rhododendron, J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 109: 343.Google Scholar
  2. Bennet, L.K., and Davies Jr., F.T., 1986, In vitro propagation of Quercus shumardii seedlings, HortScience, 21; 1045.Google Scholar
  3. Bonga, J. M., 1987, Clonal propagation of mature trees: problems and possible solutions, in: “Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry, vol. 1”, J.M. Bonga and D.J. Durzan, eds., Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  4. Bouriquet, R., Tsogas, M., and Blaselle, A., 1984, Essais de rajeunissement de l’épicéa par les cytokinines, Ann. AFOCEL, 173.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, K.M., and Leopold, A.C., 1973, Ethylene and the regulation of growth in pine, Can. J. For. Res., 3: 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Franclet, A., 1980, Rajeunissement et propagation végétative des ligneux, Ann. AFOCEL: 12.Google Scholar
  7. Franclet, A., 1983, Rajeunissement, culture in vitro et pratique sylvicole, Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr., 130 Actual. Bot., 2: 87.Google Scholar
  8. Economou, A.S., and Read, P.E., 1986, Microcutting production from sequential reculturing of hardy deciduous azalea shoot tips, HortScience, 21: 137.Google Scholar
  9. Greenwood, M.S., 1987, Rejuvenation of forest trees, Plant Growth Regulation, 6: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gresshoff, P.M., and Doy, C.H., 1972, Development and differentiation of haploid Lycopersicon esculentum, Planta, 107: 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta, P.K., Metha, U., and Mascarenhas, A.F., 1983, A tissue culture method for rapid multiplication of mature trees of Eucalyptus torelliana and E. camaldulensis, Plant Cell Rep., 2: 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansen, K.C., and Lazarte, J.E., 1984, In vitro propagation of pecan seedlings, HortScience, 19: 237.Google Scholar
  13. Lane, W.D., 1979, Regeneration of pear plants from shoot meristem tips, Plant Sci. Lett., 16: 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Margara, J., 1982, “Bases de la multiplication végétative”, INRA, Versailles.Google Scholar
  15. Magalewski, R.L., and Hackett, W.P., 1979, Cutting propagation of Eucalyptus ficifolia using cytokinin-induced basal trunk sprouts, Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc., 29: 118.Google Scholar
  16. McGranahan, G.H., Driver, J.A., and Tulecke, W., 1987, Tissue culture of Juglans, in: “Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry, vol. 3”, J.M. Bonga and D.J. Durzan, eds., Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  17. Monteouis, O., 1987, In vitro meristem culture of juvenile and mature Sequoiadendron giganteum, Tree Physiology, 3: 265.Google Scholar
  18. Murashige, T., and Skoog, F., 1962, A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures, Physiol. Plant., 15: 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reynoird, J.P., 1983, “Effet de prétraitment par greffages successifs ou par pulvérisation de cytokinine sur la réactivation de Douglas agé (Pseudotsuga menziesii) en vue de la propagation végétative. Incidence de quelques facteurs du milieu de culture sur la croissance in vitro d’individus juvéniles”, DEA Université de Paris VI, Paris.Google Scholar
  20. San-José, M.C., Ballester, A., and Vieitez, A.M., 1988, Factors affecting in vitro propagation of Quercus robur L., Tree Physiology, 4: 281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Vieitez, A. M., Ballester, A., Vieitez, M.L., and Vieitez, E., 1983, In vitro plantlet regeneration of mature chestnut, J. Hortic. Sci., 58: 457.Google Scholar
  22. Vieitez, A.M., San-José, M.C., and Vieitez, E., 1985, In vitro plantlet regeneration from juvenile and mature Quercus robur L., J. Hortic. Sci., 60: 99.Google Scholar
  23. Vieitez, J., Kingston, D.G.I., Ballester, A., and Vieitez, E., 1987, Identification of two compounds correlated with lack of rooting capacity of chestnut cuttings, Tree Physiology, 3: 247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Vieitez, M.L., and Vieitez, A.M., 1981, Injerto en hipocótilo de plántulas de castano, Anal. Edafol. Agrobiol., 40: 647.Google Scholar
  25. Yae, B.W., Zimmermann, R.H., Fordham, I., and Ko, K. Ch., 1987, Influence of photoperiod, apical meristem and explant orientation on axillary shoot proliferation of apple cultivars in vitro, J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 112: 588.Google Scholar
  26. Yeang, H.Y., and Hillman, J.R., 1984, Ethylene and apical dominance, Physiol. Plant., 60: 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Ballester
    • 1
  • M. C. Sánchez
    • 1
  • M. C. San-José
    • 1
  • F. J. Vieitez
    • 1
  • A. M. Vieitez
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant PhysiologyCSICSantiago de CompostelaSpain

Personalised recommendations