Abstract
Castanea sativa is a woody plant difficult to propagate by conventional methods. Cuttings are difficult to root, and, due to the almost complete autoincompatibility, the levels of heterozygoty are very high, thus compromising programs of propagation by seeds. Until recently some success was obtained on the micropropagation of adult plants of C.sativa × C.crenata hybrids (reviewed by Vieitez et al.,1986). However, as stressed by several authors trees and shrubs can only be selected for cloning when they are adult (cf. Bonga and Durzan,eds.,1982, and Pierik,1987). As a consequence, efficient methods of micropropagation of adult specimens are required if cloning of a specific tree is needed. In C.sativa different attempts of micropropagate adult material have failed systematically in the rooting step (Chevre, 1985; Mullins, 1987). The presence of rooting inhibitors in mature material may be one of the reasons of this failure, since this kind of compounds seems to be absent from juvenile and etiolated material (Gesto et al.,1977; Vieitez et al.,1987). Since C.sativa lacks other precise juvenility markers, the ability of rooting could therefore be considered as a rough rejuvenation marker. Recently a complete process of micropropagation of adult material of C.sativa has been described (Feijô and Pais,1988; Feijô and Pais,1989). This paper describes some results on this process related to a possible rejuvenation occurring in vitro.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bonga, JM, Durzan, DJ, eds., 1982, Tissue Culture in Forestry, Martinus Nijhoff & W.Junk Publ.,The Hague, 1,420
Bonga, JM, Durzan, DJ, eds., 1987, Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry, vols. 1–3, Martinus Nijhoff Pub., Dordrecht
Chevre, AM, 1985, Recherches sur la multiplication vegetative in vitro chez le chaitaigner. These Doct., Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux
Gesto, MDV, Vasquez, A, Vieitez, E, 1977, “Rooting substances in water extracts of Castanea sativa and Salix viminalis”, Physiol. Plant., 40: 265, 268
Gresshof, PM, Doy, CH, 1972, “Development and Differentiation of haploid Lycopersicum esculentum (tomato)” Planta, 17: 161, 170
Feijo, JF, Pais, MS, 1988, “Micropropagaçäo de Castanea sativa Mill. a partir de gemas axilares de espécimes adultos”, Proc.Reuniao Soc.Port.Biotecnol., SPB, Coimbra
Feijo, JF, Pais, MS, 1989, “In vitro propagation of adult trees of Castanea sativa Mill, through axillary bud culture”, Submitted
Marques, CM, 1988, “Estabelecimento de Castanea sativa in vitro”, Relatorio de projecto, Fac. Ciências de Lisboa, Lisboa.
Moncousin, J, 1982, Proc.5th Int. Cong.Plant Tissue Cell Culture, 5: 147,148
Mullins, KV, 1987, “Micropropagation of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.)”, Acta Horticulturae, 212:525,530
Pierik, 1987, In, Vitro culture of higher plants, Martinus Nijhoff Pub., Dordrecht
Vieitez, AM, Vieitez, ML, Vieitez, E, 1986, “Chestnut (Castanea spp.)” in Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, YPS Bajaj, ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Vol.1 (Trees), 393, 414
Vieitez, J, Kingston, DGI, Ballester, A, Vieitez, E, 1987, “Identification of two compounds correlated with lack of rooting capacity of chestnut cuttings”, Tree Physiol., 3: 247,255
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feijó, J.A., Pais, M.S.S. (1990). Rejuvenation of Adult Specimens of Castanea Sativa Mill: Through In Vitro Micropropagation. In: Rodríguez, R., Tamés, R.S., Durzan, D.J. (eds) Plant Aging. NATO ASI Series, vol 186. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5760-5_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5760-5_50
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5762-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5760-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive