Plant Aging pp 161-168 | Cite as

Improvement of Micropropagation Methods Linked To Biochemical Properties During “In Vitro” Cultures

  • Anne-Marie Hirsch
  • Dominique Fortune
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 186)

Abstract

In vitro culture is nowadays an important biotechnology method making possible plant micropropagation and creation of new varieties of economic interest. Our laboratory was one of the first in which these techniques were developed, under Gautheret’s impetus. At the beginning, the main interest of in vitro culture methods was essentially a fundamental one, as it offers new possibilities for tissues to be studied in absence of correlations with the plant and to investigate the morphogenic properties of the cell. This last point remains of value, because it offers the possibility to regenerate a whole plant from isolated and in vitro rejuvenated cells able again to produce meristematic tissue and shooting apices. Recent research in this area is naturally devoted to biochemical markers of morphogenic potentialities of cultured cells and tissues, but a new field of investigation is gaining ground, namely the study of variability of the hereditary structures during development and of the control of genetic expression. As a matter of fact, if stable enough alterations of the hereditary information, both nuclear and cytoplasmic, occur in certain cellular strains, the plants originated from these cells will keep the trace.

Keywords

Maize Chlorophyll Carbohydrate Proline Vasil 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1-.
    L. Velayandom, A.M. Hirsch and D. Fortune-1985-Propagation du Kiwi, Actinidia chinensis L. Planchon, par microbouturage in vitro de nœuds-C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, série III, n°12, 597–600.Google Scholar
  2. 2-.
    M. Monnier, O. Faure and A. Sigogneau-1989-Somatic embryogenesis of Vitis-I.A.P.T.C.-The impact of biotechnology in Agriculture, July 10–12th Amiens, France.Google Scholar
  3. 3-.
    R. Heller-1953-Recherches sur la nutrition minérale des tissus végétaux cultivés in vitro-Ann. Sc. Nat., 14, 1–223.Google Scholar
  4. 4-.
    T. Murashige and F. Skoog-1962-A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures-Physiol. Plant., 15, 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5-.
    B.K. Tripathi and R. Saussay-1980-Sur la multiplication végétative de l’Actinidia chinensis L. Planchon (chinese gooseberry) par culture de racines issues de filet staminaux-C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 291, 1067–1069.Google Scholar
  6. 6-.
    R. Durand and D.B. Durand-1984-Sexual differentiation in higher plants-Physiol. Plant., 60, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7-.
    A.M. Hirsch, D. Fortune and P. Blanchet-1989-Study of diœcism in kiwifruit, Actinidia deliciosa Chevalier-Acta Hort., under press.Google Scholar
  8. 8-.
    A.M. Hirsch and D. Fortune-1984-Peroxidase activity and isoperoxidase composition in cultured stem tissue callus and cell suspension of Actinidia chinensis-Z. Pflanzenphysiol., 113, 129–139.Google Scholar
  9. 9-.
    B. Verschoore-Martouzet-1985-Etude de la variation topophysique au cours du clonage de Sequoia sempervirens (Endlicher)-Thèse-Paris.Google Scholar
  10. 10-.
    C. Moncousin-1982-Peroxidase as tracer for rooting improvement and expressing regeneration during in vitro multiplication of Cynara cardunculus-In Fujiwara A.-Ed. Plant tissue culture-Jap. Assoc. Plant Tissue Culture, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  11. 11-.
    D.C.W. Brown, D.W.M. Leung and T.A. Thorpe-1979-Osmotic requirement for shoot formation in tobacco callus-Physiol. Plant., 46, 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12-.
    D.C.W. Brown and T.A. Thorpe-1980-Changes in water potential and its components during shoot formation in tobacco callus Physiol. Plant. 49, 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13-.
    D.W. Lee and D.K. Dougall-1973-Electrophoretic variation in glutamate deshydrogenase and other isozymes in wild carrot cells cultured in presence and in absence of 2–4-D-In Vitro, 8, 347–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14-.
    Z.S. Wochok and B. Burleson-1974-Isoperoxidase activity and induction in tissues of wild carrot: a comparison of proembryos and embryos-Physiol. Plant., 31, 73–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15-.
    N.P. Everett, M.J. Wach and D.J. Ashworth-1985-Biochemical markers of embryogenesis in tissue culture of the maize inbred B 73-Plant Science, 41, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16-.
    E. Sanchez de Jimenez, M. Vargas, R. Aguilar and E. Jimenez-1988-Age dependent responsiveness to cell differentiation stimulus in maize callus culture-Plant. Physiol. Biochem., 26(6), 723–732.Google Scholar
  17. 17-.
    V.M. Loyola-Vargas and E. Sanchez de Jimenez-1984-Differential role of glutamate deshydrogenase in nitrogen metabolism of maize tissue-Plant Physiol., 76, 536–540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18a-.
    D.A. Stuart and S.A. Strickland-1984-somatic embryogenesis from cell cultures of Medicago sativa L. a- The role of amino-acid addition to regeneration medium. Plant. Sci. Lett., 34, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18b-.
    D.A. Stuart and S.A. Strickland-1984-somatic embryogenesis from cell cultures of Medicago sativa L. b- The interaction of amino-acids with ammonium-Plant. Sci. Lett., 34, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19-.
    S. Handa, R.A. Bressan, A.K. Handa, N.C. Carpita and P. Hasegawa-1983-Solutes contributing to osmotic adjustment in cultured plant cells adapted to water stress-Plant Physiol., 73, 834–843.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 20-.
    Z.R. Sung and R. Okimoto-1983-Coordinate gene expression during somatic embryogenesis in carrots-Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci, 80, 2661–2665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 21-.
    S. Stirn and H.J. Jacobsen-1987-Marker proteins for embryonic differentiation patterns in pea callus-Plant Cell Rep., 6, 50–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 22-.
    D.A. Evans and W.R. Sharp-1986-Applications of somaclonal variation. Biotechnol., 4, 528–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 23-.
    W. Halperin-1986-Attainment and retention of morphogenic capacity in vitro-In “Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants”, vol.3, I.K. Vasil Ed., p.3–47, Acad. Press New York.Google Scholar
  25. 24-.
    X.Q. Li, P. Chetrit, C. Mathieu, F. Vedel, R. de Paepe, R. Remy and F. Ambard-1988-Regeneration of cytoplasmic male sterile protoclone of Nicotiana sylvestris with mitochondrial variations. Curr. Genet., 13, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Marie Hirsch
    • 1
  • Dominique Fortune
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Histophysiologie Végétale-URA-CNRS-1180Université Pierre et Marie CurieParisFrance

Personalised recommendations