Advertisement

Dual-Route, Act*, and PDP Models of the Acquisition of Word Decoding Skills

  • Fotena A. Zirps
  • Richard K. Wagner

Abstract

A necessary, but perhaps not sufficient condition of literacy is the ability to decode individual words. Our understanding of this remarkable achievement has profited greatly by the fact that the study of word-level reading processes has been, and continues to be, a major interest to those who study human cognition.

Keywords

Lexical Decision Letter String Regular Word Word Decode Regularity Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. A., & Hinton, G. E. (1981). Parallel models of associative memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. R. (1977). Induction of augmented transition networks. Cognitive Science, 1, 125–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory & Cognition, 10, 565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Backman, J., Bruck, M., Hebert, M., & Seidenberg, M. (1984). Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barron, R. (1980). Visual and phonological strategies in reading and spelling. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 195–213 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Barron, R. (1986). Word recognition in early reading: A review of the direct and indirect hypotheses. Cognition, 24, 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, R., & Besner, D. (1981). This and thap-constraints on the pronunciation of new, written words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 375–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Doctor, E. H., & Coltheart, M. (1980). Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning. Memory & Cognition, 8, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischler, I. (1977). Associative facilitation without expectancy in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glushko, R. J. (1981). Principles for pronouncing print: The psychology of phonography. In A. M. Lesgold, & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 61–84 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Goswami, U. C. ( 1985, April). The role of analogy in early reading development. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Humphreys, G. W., & Evett, L. J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual- route theory of reading. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 689–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jorm, A. F., & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 103–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kay, J., & Marcel, A. J. (1981). One process, not two, in reading aloud: Lexical analogies do the work of non-lexical rules. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic word processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mason, J. (1980). When do children begin to read: An exploration of four-year-old childrensT letter and word reading competencies. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 2, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Norman, D. A. (1986). Reflections on cognition and parallel distributed processing. In J. L. McClelland, & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing (pp. 531–546 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1978). Priming in item recognition. Evidence for the propositional nature of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosson, M. B. (1983). From SOFA to LOUCH: Lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation. Memory & Cognition, 11, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosson, M. B. (1985). The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations in reading aloud. Memory & Cognition, 13, 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  32. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Venezky, R. L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  36. Waters, G. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition, 13, 557–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waters, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & Bruck, M. (1984). Children’s and adults1 use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Memory & Cognition, 12, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fotena A. Zirps
    • 1
  • Richard K. Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations