From Literacy to Cognitive Science

  • Bikkar S. Randhawa

Abstract

The title of this essay, if not pretentious, is certainly overwhelming. In order to make it less so, it is necessary to provide the scope of this essay. Not only would this keep me within the confines of my target, but it will also act as an advance organizer for the reader.

Keywords

Europe Mold Hunt Defend Harness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, J. (1988). Illiteracy. University of Toronto Magazine, 14 (2), 4.Google Scholar
  2. Amove, R. (1973). Education and political participation in rural areas of Latin America. Comparative Education Review, 17, 198–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandt, A. (1980). Do we care if Johnny can read? American Heritage, 31, 4–13.Google Scholar
  4. Calfee, R. (1985). Computer literacy and book literacy: Parallels and contrasts. Educational Researcher, 14 (5), 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caliver, A. (1953). Literacy education: National statistics and other related data. (United States Office of Education, Circular No. 376.) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  6. Chall, J. S., Harman, D., Isaac, E., Jones, D., Laubach, F., Laubach, R., & O’Neil, W. (1970). Literacy in America: A symposium. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 264–276.Google Scholar
  7. Clifford, G. C. (1984). Buch und lesen: Historical perspectives on literacy and schooling. Review of Educational Research, 54, 472–500.Google Scholar
  8. Canadian Business Task Force on Literacy. (1988). Measuring the costs of illiteracy in Canada. Toronto: Woods Gordon Management Consultants.Google Scholar
  9. Dauzet, S. V., & Dauzet, J. (1977). Literacy: In quest of a definition. Convergence, 10, 37–41.Google Scholar
  10. Educational Researcher. (1985). Articles. Educational Researcher, 14(5), 4–16, 25–38.Google Scholar
  11. Fleming, R. (1987). Technological literacy. (Unpublished report completed under contract with Saskatchewan Education, College of Education, University of Saskatchewan.) Saskatoon, Canada: University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
  12. Kirsch, I., & Guthrie, J. T. (1977–78). The concept and measurement of functional literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 485–507.Google Scholar
  13. Klassen, D. (1981). Computer literacy: Computer education for elementary and secondary schools. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
  14. Kline, S. J. (1985). What is technology? The Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 1, 215218.Google Scholar
  15. Lang, B. (1983). Preliteracy, postliteracy, and the cunning of history. Journal of Reading, 26, 581 - 585.Google Scholar
  16. Levine, K. (1982). Functional literacy: Fond illusions and false economies. Harvard Educational Review, 52, 249–266.Google Scholar
  17. Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Madge, C. (1955). Some aspects of mass literacy. British Journal of Educational Studies, 4, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  20. McPhail, I. P. (1987). Literacy as a liberating experience. English Quarterly, 20, 9–15.Google Scholar
  21. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  22. Noble, D. (1984). Computer literacy and ideology. Teachers College Record, 85, 602–614.Google Scholar
  23. Olson, D. R. (1985). Computers as tools of intellect. Educational Researcher, 14 (5), 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olson, D. R. (1986). The cognitive consequences of literacy. Canadian Psychology, 27, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Orr, V. (1983). Are we a nation of scientific illiterates? American Education, 19(3), 24–25, 35–36.Google Scholar
  26. Ost, D. H. (1985). The nature of technologic literacy. School Science and Mathematics, 85, 689–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Postman, N. (1970). The politics of reading. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 244–259.Google Scholar
  28. Prewitt, K. (1983). Civic education and scientific illiteracy. Journal of Teacher Education, 34 (6), 17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Randhawa, B. S., & Hunt, D. (1984). Computers and computer literacy in contemporary psychological, socio-economic and educational context. Association for Educational Data Systems Journal, 17 (3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  30. Resnick, D. P., & Resnick, L. B. (1977). The nature of literacy: An historical exploration. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 370–385.Google Scholar
  31. Rigden, J. S. (1983). The art of great science. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 613–617.Google Scholar
  32. Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Graff, H. J. (1981). Introduction. In H. J. Graff (Ed.), Literacy and social development in the west: A reader (pp. 1–13 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Gray, W. S. (1956). The teaching of reading and writing. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  35. Greenfield, P. M. (1972). Oral and written language: The consequences of cognitive development in Africa, the United States and England. Language and Speech, 15, 169–178.Google Scholar
  36. Hillerich, R. (1976). Towards an assessable definition of literacy. English Journal, 65, 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoyles, M. (1977). The politics of literacy. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.Google Scholar
  38. Hutchins, E. (1980). Culture and inference. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Innis, H. (1951). The basis of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  40. Judy, R. W., & Lommel, J. M. (1986). The new Soviet computer literacy campaign. Educational Communication and Technology, 34 (2), 108–123.Google Scholar
  41. Scribner, S. (1977). Modes of thinking and ways of speaking: Culture and logic reconsidered. In P. N. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science (pp. 483–500 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1978). Literacy without schooling: Testing for intellectual effects. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 448–461.Google Scholar
  43. Shavelson, R. J., & Salomon, G. (1985). Information technology: Tool and teacher of the mind. Educational Researcher, 14 (5), 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, F. (1989). Overselling literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 353–359.Google Scholar
  45. Stock, B. (1983). Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language, 58, 1–21.Google Scholar
  46. Traugott, E. C. (1987). Literacy and language change: The special case of speech act verbs.. Interchange, 18 (2), 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  48. United States Office of Education. (1910). Foreign elementary education. (Annual Report of the U.S. Commissioner of Education.) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  49. United States Office of Education. (1969). Dynamics of technology and society: No compromise with ignorance. (Address by Grant Vann, Associate Commissioner for Adult, Vocational, and Library Programs at the American Association of Junior Colleges.) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  50. Yager, R. E. (1983). Goals provide direction in science education. Science Education in Ohio, 2 (1), 1–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bikkar S. Randhawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations