Abstract
This chapter offers a glimpse into Canada’s future (25 years from now) by extrapolating from key events that have occurred since World War II. Prominent in this analysis and projection is an “attentive public,” who assumes social responsibilities related to science and technology. The 21st century will demand citizens who have the savvy to explore, understand, and to some degree control, their own fate in a society increasingly shaped by science and technology. Citizens with these abilities are science literate. In this chapter, scientific literacy is: (1) described in terms of a savvy citizenry; (2) explored with respect to its status as an education goal; and (3) defined within a case study of curriculum change in the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aikenhead, G. S. (1980). Science in social issues: Implications for teaching. Ottawa: Science Council of Canada.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1985). Collective decision making in the social context of science. Science Education, 69, 453–475.
Aikenhead, G. S. (in press). Scientific/technological literacy, critical reasoning, classroom practice. In L. Phiilips & S. Norris (Eds.), Exploring the breadth and depth of literacy.
Broudy, H. S. (1969). Science and human values. The Science Teacher, 36, 23–28.
Bubb, I. C., & Derion, J. C. (1978). Light water: How the nuclear dream dissolved. New York: Basic Books.
Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett.
D’Amore, L. J. (1981). An overview of SIA. In F. Tester & W. Mykes (Eds.), Social impact assessment: Theory, method and practice (pp. 366–373 ). Calgary: Detselig Enterprises.
Dickson, D. (1984). The new politics of science. New York: Pantheon Books.
Fleming, R. W. (in press). Being literate in a technological society. In L. Phillips & S. Norris (Eds.), Exploring the breadth and depth of literacy.
Gabel, L. L. (1976). The development of a model to determine perceptions of scientific literacy. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Gauld, C. (1982). The scientific attitude and science education: A critical reappraisal. Science Education, 66, 109–121.
Gosling, D., & Musschenga, B. (Eds.). (1985). Science education and ethical values. Geneva: WCC Publications.
Harms, N. C. (1981). Project synthesis: Summary and implications for teachers. In N. C. Harms & R. E. Yager (Eds.), What research says to the science teacher: Vol. 3 (pp. 113–127 ). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
Hart, E. P. (1987). Science for Saskatchewan schools: A review of research literature, analysis, and recommendations. Regina, Saskatchewan: Faculty of Education, SIDRU Research Report No. 7.
Holton, G. (1978). The scientific imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as a process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hurd, P. ( 1988, February). The emergence of a new synthesis for biology education. Paper presented at the 3rd National Science, Technology and Society Conference, Arlington, VA.
Krimsky, S. (1980). Public participation in the formation of science and technology policy. In D. Wolfle, A. W. Branscomb, & B. M. Casper (Eds.), Public policy decision making and scientific literacy: Information needs for science and technology (pp. 112–161). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, Report No. NSF-80-21-A6.
LaPorte, T. (1983). Provisional model of technology and social change. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley, Political Science 188, Berkeley, CA.
Lifton, R. J., & Falk, R. (1982). Indefensible weapons: The political and psychological case against nuclearism. Toronto: Canadian Broad-casting Corporation.
Lovelock, J. E. (1979). Gaia: A new look at life on earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Munby, H. (1982). What is scientific thinking. Ottawa: Science Council of Canada.
Postman, N., & Weingartner, C. (1969). Teaching as a subversive activity. New York: Delacorte Press.
Prewitt, K. (1983). Scientific illiteracy and democratic theory. Daedalus, 96, 49–64.
Roberts, D. A. (1983). Scientific literacy: Towards balance in setting goals for school science programs. Ottawa: Science Council of Canada.
Saskatchewan Education. (1988, September). Science: Program overview and connections (K) 1–12 ( Draft edition). Regina: Provincial Department of Education.
Savon, B. (1988). Science under siege: The myth of objectivity in scientific research. Toronto: CBC Enterprises.
Scheffler, I. (1965). Conditions of knowledge. Chicago: Scott, Foresman.
Science Council of Canada. (1984). Science for every student. (Report No. 36 ). Ottawa: Science Council of Canada.
Simpson, R. D., & Anderson, N. D. (1981). Science, students, and schools A guide for the middle and secondary school teacher. New York: John Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aikenhead, G. (1989). Scientific Literacy and the Twenty-First Century. In: Leong, C.K., Randhawa, B.S. (eds) Understanding Literacy and Cognition. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5748-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5748-3_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5750-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5748-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive