Radiative Recombination in Free Standing Quantum Boxes

  • S. R. Andrews
  • H. Arnot
  • T. M. Kerr
  • P. K. Rees
  • S. P. Beaumont
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 214)

Abstract

We report photoluminescence measurements made on free standing lattice matched GaAs/AlGaAs and pseudomorphic InGaAs/GaAs quantum boxes fabricated by laterally patterning quantum wells using electron beam lithography and either reactive ion etching or ion beam milling. At temperatures below 20K the luminescence efficiency of the GaAs quantum box arrays tends to scale with the volume of quantum well material remaining after processing even for the smallest boxes which have lateral dimensions of only 40–50 nm. These observations suggest that the surface recombination rate in GaAs sub-micron structures is not necessarily large relative to the radiative recombination rate at low temperatures. In contrast radiative recombination in the InGaAs/GaAs quantum boxes is strongly quenched for lateral dimensions less than 500 nm. We suggest that this is because photoexcited carriers rapidly thermalise and become laterally localised in the GaAs boxes by potentials of order a few meV, perhaps arising from the effects of interface fluctuations or strain relaxation, and that such localisation effects are smaller in the InGaAs boxes.

Keywords

Titanium Methane Anisotropy Argon Recombination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D E Aspnes, ‘Recombination at semiconductor surfaces and interfaces’ Surf. Science 132, 406 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. D Bimberg, in “Solid State Devices” ed P Balk and 0 G Folberth (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 19860, p.101Google Scholar
  3. F Briones, and D M Collins, ‘Low temperature photoluminescence of lightly Sidoped and undoped MBE GaAs’ J. El. Mats. 11, 847 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. L Brus, ‘Zero-dimensional ‘excitons’ in semiconductor clusters’ IEEE J. Quantum Electronics 22, 1909 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. G W Bryant, ‘Excitons in quantum boxes: Correlation effects and quantum confinement’ Phys. Rev. B37, 2635 (1988)Google Scholar
  6. J Cibert, P M Petroff, G J Dolan, S J Pearton, A C Gossard, and J H English, ‘Optically detected carrier confinement to one and zero dimension in GaAs quantum well wires and boxes’ Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 175 (1986)Google Scholar
  7. D S Chemla, and D A B Miller, ‘Mechanism for enhanced optical nonlinearities and bistability by combined dielectric-electronic confinement in semiconductor microcrystals’ Optics Lett. 11, 522 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. R Cheung, S Thorns, S P Beaumont, G Doughy, V Law, and C D W Wilkinson, ‘Reactive ion etching of GaAs using a mixture of methane and hydrogen’ El. Lett. 23, 857 (1987)Google Scholar
  9. J Feldman, G Peter, E O Göbel, P Dawson, K Moore, C Foxon, and R J Elliott, ‘Linewidth dependence of radiative exciton lifetimes in quantum wells’ Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2337 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. A Forchel, H Leier, B E Maile, and R Germann, ‘Fabrication and optical spectroscopy of ultra small III-V compound semiconductor structures’ Festkörperprobleme (Advances in solid state physics) 28, 99 (1988)Google Scholar
  11. D Gershoni, H Temkin, G J Dolan, J Dunsmuir, S N Chu, and M B Pannish, ‘Effects of two-dimensional confinement on the optical properties of InGaAs/InP wire structures’ Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 995 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. E O Göbel, H Jung, J Kuhl, and K Ploog, ‘Recombination enhancement due to carrier localisation in quantum well structures’ Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1588 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. J Hegarty, L Goldner, and M D Sturge, ‘Localised and delocalised two-dimensional excitons in a GaAs-AlGaAs multiple-quantum-well structure’ Phys. Rev. B30, 7346 (1984)Google Scholar
  14. Y Hirayama, S Tarucha, Y Suzuki, and H Okamoto, ‘Fabrication of a GaAs quantum-well-wire structure by Ga focused-ion-beam implantation and its optical properties’ Phys. Rev. B37, 2774 (1988)Google Scholar
  15. J D Huang, U K Reddy, T S Henderson, R Houdre, and H Morkoc, ‘Optical investigation of highly strained InGaAs-GaAs multiple quantum wells’ J. Appl. Phys. 62, 3366 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. K Kash, A Scherer, J M Worlock, H G Craighead, and M C Tamargo, ‘Optical spectroscopy of ultra small structures etched from quantum wells’ Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 1043 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. K Kash, J M Worlock, M D Sturge, P Grabbe, J P Harbison, A Scherer and P S D Lin, ‘Strain-induced lateral confinement of excitons in GaAs-A1GaAs quantum well microstructures’ Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 782 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. B E Maile, A Forchel, R Germann, K Streubel, F Scholz, G Weimann, and W Schlapp, ‘Fabrication of nanometer width GaAs/A1GaAs and InGaAs/InP quantum wires ’ Microcircuit Engineering 6, 163 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Y Masumoto, S Shionoya, and H Kawaguichi, ‘Picosecond time-resolved study of excitons in GaAs-AlAs multi-quantum-well structures’ Phys. Rev. B29, 2324 (1984)Google Scholar
  20. D A B Miller, D S Chemla, and S Schmitt-Rink, ‘Electroabsorption of highly confined systems: Theory of the quantum-confined Franz-Keldysh effect in semiconductor quantum wires and dots’ Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 2154 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. B I Miller, A Sharar, U Koren, and P J Corvini, ‘Quantum wires in InGaAs/InP fabricated by holographic photolithography’ Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 188 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Y Miyamoto, M Cao, Y Shingai, K Furuya, Y Suematsu, K G Ravikumar, and S Arai, ‘Light emission from quantum-box structures by current injection’ Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 26, L225 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. P M Petroff, A C Dossard, R A Logan, and W Wiegmann, ‘Towards quantum well wires: Fabrication and optical properties’ Appl. Phys. Lett. 42, 635 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. S F Ren, and J D Dow, ‘A mechanism of luminescence enhancement by classical well structures of superlattices’ J. Luminescence 33, 103 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. S Schmitt-Rink, D A B Miller, and D S Chemla, ‘Theory of linear and nonlinear optical properties of semiconductor microcrystallites’ Phys. Rev. B35, 8113 (1987)Google Scholar
  26. D T Stevenson, and R J Keyes, ‘Measurements of the recombination velocity at germanium surfaces’ Physica 20, 1041 (1954)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. H Temkin, G J Dolan, M B Panish, and S N G Chu, ‘Low temperature photoluminescence from InGaAs/InP wires and boxes’ Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 413 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. W-Y Wu, J N Schulman, T Y Hsu, and U Effron, ‘Effect of size non-uniformity on the absorption spectrum of a semiconductor quantum dot system’ Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 710 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. R. Andrews
    • 1
  • H. Arnot
    • 2
  • T. M. Kerr
    • 1
  • P. K. Rees
    • 1
  • S. P. Beaumont
    • 2
  1. 1.GEC Hirst Research CentreWembleyUK
  2. 2.Dept of Electronic and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations