Advertisement

NORPLANT® Introduction: A Management Perspective

  • Joanne Spicehandler
Part of the Reproductive Biology book series (RBIO)

Abstract

In 1983, the Population Council initiated an effort that had never before been undertaken by a public sector organization: the systematic introduction of NORPLANT® implants, a contraceptive developed through its own research and development program. This decision has continued to have an overall impact on the approach taken by other public sector institutions in this field.

Keywords

Family Planning Focus Group Discussion Dominican Republic Family Planning Service Family Planning Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Affandi, Biran, Joedo Prihartono, Firman Lubis, et al.1987 Insertion and removal of NORPLANT® contraceptive implants by physicians and nonphysicians in an Indonesian clinic.Studies in Family Planning 18(5):302–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez-Sanchez, Frank, Vivian Brache, and Anibal Faundes 1988 The clinical performance of NORPLANT® implants over time: A comparison of two cohorts. Studies in Family Planning 19(2):118–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berelson, Bernard 1966 The Population Council Annual Report, 1966. Report of the President. New York: The Population Council. Google Scholar
  4. Bruce, Judith 1987User’s perspectives on contraceptive technology and delivery systems: Highlighting some feminist issues. Technology in Society 9:359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hardy, Ellen, Clara Baez, Telma Rodrigues, et al.1988 User’s Attitudes About NORPLANT® Contraceptive Subdermal Implants and Changes that Occur with Use of the Method. A two-part report of a study conducted in the Dominican Republic.Google Scholar
  6. Hardy, Ellen, Maria das G. Coutinho, Patricia Goodson, et al. 1986 Study of the Response of Acceptors to the Attributes of NORPLANT® Contraceptive Subdermal Implants and to Changes that Occur with Use of the Method. A four-part report of a study conducted in Brazil.Google Scholar
  7. International Women’s Health Coalition and The Population Council 1986The Contraceptive Development Process and Quality of Care in Reproductive Health Services. Report of a meeting held in New York City, October 8–9.Google Scholar
  8. Jain, Anrudh K. 1989Fertility reduction and the quality of family planning services.Studies in Family Planning 20(1):1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Phillips, James, Ruth Simmons, Michael Koenig, and J. Chakraborty 1987Determinants of Reproductive Change in a Traditional Society: Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh. A Working Paper no. 135 from the Population Council’s Center for Policy Studies. The Population Council, New York.Google Scholar
  10. The Population Council 1987 Contraceptive Introduction Program: Status: December 1987. A report prepared for the U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  11. 1989.
    The Research, Development, and Introduction of NORPLANT® Implants. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  12. Program for Appropriate Technology in Health 1987 Use of Focus Group Discussion Research: Looking at the Acceptability of NORPLANT® Implants in Four Countries to Improve Product Introduction Efforts. Unpublished report. Program for Appropriate Technology in Health.Google Scholar
  13. Sivin, Irving 1988International experience with NORPLANT® and NORPLANT® -2 contraceptives. Studies in Family Planning 19(2):81–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Soni, Veena 1984 The development and current organisation of the family planning programme. In Tim Dyson and Nigel Crook, eds., India’s Demography: Essays on the Contemporary Population. New Delhi: South Asian Publishers Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. Spicehandler, Joanne, and Forrest Greenslade 1986 Training, Counseling and Informational Needs for Introducing a New Contraceptive Technology: NORPLANT® Implants. Paper presented at the 12th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility, Singapore, October 26–31, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. Vollmer, Loraine 1985 Women’s Perspectives on the NORPLANT® Contraceptive Implants in Colombia. A report submitted to the Population Council, August 1985. New York: The Population Council.Google Scholar
  17. Zeidenstein, George 1980 The User Perspective: An Evolutionary Step in Contraceptive Service Programs. Studies in Family Planning ll(l):24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanne Spicehandler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations