Advertisement

Financing the Delivery of Contraceptives: The Challenge of the Next Twenty Years

  • Duff G. Gillespie
  • Harry E. Cross
  • John G. Crowley
  • Scott R. Radloff
Part of the Reproductive Biology book series (RBIO)

Abstract

The developing world has dramatically changed its attitudes and behavior toward fertility in the past 20 years. When the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) started its program in the mid-1960s, there were perhaps 15 million family planning users in the Third World, excluding the People’s Republic of China.1 Today, there are more than 200 million. Prevalence for all methods has increased during the same period, from 15 percent of married women of reproductive age in the late 1960s to about 40 percent in 1988. These dramatic shifts in behavior have accompanied changes in governmental and donor policies. The perception of governments and donors has been transformed from one of near indifference and inaction 25 years ago to one of intense concern and activity today. In the mid-1960s, donor support for family planning amounted to a few million dollars. Today, that figure exceeds one-half billion dollars. The changing political environment is highlighted by the fact that most developing country governments currently have population policies favoring lower fertility.

Keywords

Family Planning Total Fertility Rate Family Planning Service Family Planning Program Contraceptive User 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bongaarts, J. 1986 The transition in reproductive behavior in the Third World. World Population and U.S. Policy. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  2. Bongaarts, J., and J. Stover 1986 Target Setting Model, A User’s Manual. Population Council Working Paper no. 130. New York: The Population Council.Google Scholar
  3. Boulier, B. 1984 Unmet Need for Contraception: Evaluation of Measures and Estimates for Thirty-Six Developing Countries. World Bank Working Paper. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Bulatao, R. 1985 Expenditures on Population Programs in Developing Regions. World Bank Staff Working Paper no. 679. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Gillespie, D. 1987 Mobilizing Resources to Meet Demand for Family Planning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Better Health for Women and Children through Family Planning, Nairobi, Kenya, October 5–9, 1987. The Population Council, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Haub, C., 1988 and M. Kent Using population data. Population Reference Bureau. Population Today 16(5):6.Google Scholar
  7. Knodel, J., A. Chamratrithirong, and N. Debavalya 1987 Thailand’s Reproductive Revolution. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lapham, R., and P. Mauldin 1985 Contraceptive prevalence: The influence of organized family planning programs. Studies in Family Planning 16(3):117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lewis, M.A., and G. Kenney 1988 The Private Sector and Family Planning in Developing Countries: Its Role, Achievements and Potential. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute. Google Scholar
  10. Lipton, H., R. Dixon-Mueller, and P. Lee 1987 Client-provider transactions: An introduction and conceptual overview. Organizing for Effective Family Planning Programs. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Mauldin, P., and B. Berelson 1978 Conditions of fertility decline in developing countries.Studies in Family Planning 9(5):90–147.Google Scholar
  12. National Academy of Sciences 1982 Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries: An Overview and A Research Agenda. Committee on Population and Demography, Report No. 16. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  13. Population Crisis Committee 1985 A guide to modern contraceptive methods. Wallchart. Population Crisis Committee, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. Population Information Program, Johns Hopkins University 1985 Fertility and family planning surveys: An update. Population Reports Series M, no. 8.Google Scholar
  15. GILLESPIE, CROSS, CROWLEY, AND RADLOFF Reboussin D., J. DaVanzo, E. Starbird, T. Boon Ann, and S. Hadi Abdullah 1987 Contraceptive Method Switching over Women’s Reproductive Careers. Report R-3547-PC/RC. Santa Monica, Calif.: The Rand Corporation. Google Scholar
  16. Speidel, J. 1988 Resource needs for population and family planning activities in less developed countries. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  17. Trias, M. 1988 Looking at the costs of family planning. Communique 9(l):l-4.Google Scholar
  18. United Nations World Population Prospects, Estimates and Projections as Assessed in 1984.New York: United Nations. 1987 World contraceptive use. Wallchart. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Duff G. Gillespie
  • Harry E. Cross
  • John G. Crowley
  • Scott R. Radloff

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations