Advances in RF Dosimetry: Their Past and Projected Impact on the Safety Standards

  • Om P. Gandhi


The expanding usage of electromagnetic (EM) radiation has necessitated an understanding of its interaction with humans. Such knowledge is vital in evaluating and establishing radiation safety standards, determining definitive hazard levels, and understanding several of the biological effects that have been reported in the literature. Studies of the effects of EM radiation have used laboratory animals such as rats, rabbits, etc. for the study of biological and/or behavioral effects. For these experiments to have any projected meanings for humans, it is necessary to be able to quantify the whole-body power absorption and its distribution for the various irradiation conditions. It is further necessary that dosimetric information be known for humans subjected to irradiation at different frequencies and for realistic exposure conditions.


American National Standard Institute Incident Electric Field Finger Contact Metallic Body Radiation Safety Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ANSI C2, 1977, “National Electrical Safety Code,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  2. ANSI C95.1, 1982, “American National Standard -- Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio-frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 300 kHz to 100 GHz,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bernhardt, J. H., 1985, Evaluation of human exposures to low frequency fields, in “AGARD Lecture Series No. 138. The Impact of Proposed Radio-frequency Radiation Standards on Military Operations,” NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, 7 Rue Ancelle 92200 Neuilly Sur Seine, France).Google Scholar
  4. Chatterjee, I. Wu, D., and Gandhi, O. P., 1986, Human body impedance and threshold currents for perception and pain for contact hazard analysis in the VLF-MF band, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 33:486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, J. Y. and Gandhi, O. P., 1988, Thermal implications of high SARs in the body extremities at the ANSI recommended VLF-VHF safety levels, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 35-435).Google Scholar
  6. Dalziel, C. F., and Mansfield, T. H., 1950, Effect of frequency on perception current, AIEE Trans.: 1162. Durney, C. H., 1980, Electromagnetic dosimetry for models of humans and animals: a review of theoretical and numerical techniques, Proc. IEEE. 68:33.Google Scholar
  7. Durney, C. H. et al., 1978, “Radio-frequency Radiation Dosimetry Handbook,” 2nd edition, Report SAM-TR-78-22, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas).Google Scholar
  8. Gandhi, O. P., 1975, Conditions of strongest electromagnetic power deposition in man and animals, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques. 23:1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gandhi, O. P., 1979, Dosimetry -- The absorption properties of man and experimental animals, Bull. NY Acad. Medicine. 55:999.Google Scholar
  10. Gandhi, O. P., 1987, “RF Personnel Dosimeter and Dosimetry Method for Use Therewith,” US Patent No. 4.672.309).Google Scholar
  11. Gandhi, O. P. and Chatterjee I., 1982, Radio-frequency hazards in the VLF to MF band, Proc. IEEE. 70:1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gandhi, O. P., Chatterjee, I., Wu, D., and Gu, Y. G., 1985a, Likelihood of high rates of energy deposition in the human legs at the ANSI recommended 3–30 MHz RF safety levels, Proc. IEEE. 73:1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gandhi, O. P., Chatterjee, I., Wu, D., D’Andrea, J. A., and Sakamoto, K., 1985b, “Very Low Frequency Hazard Study,” report prepared for USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, on Contract F-33615-83-R-0613).Google Scholar
  14. Gandhi, O. P., Chen, J. Y., and Riazi, A., 1986, Currents induced in a human being for plane-wave exposure conditions 0-50 MHz and for RF sealers, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 33:757.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gandhi, O. P., Hunt, E. L., and D’Andrea, J. A., 1977, Deposition of electromagnetic energy in animals and in models of man with and without grounding and reflector effects, Radio Science, 12(65): 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gandhi, O. P. and Riazi, A., 1986, Absorption of millimeter waves by human beings and its biological implications, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Tech., 34:228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gronhaug, K. L. and Busmundrud, K. L., “Antenna Effect on the Human Body of EMP,” (in Norwegian), Report FFI/NOTAT-82/3013, Norwegian Defense Research Establishment, Kjeller, Norway).Google Scholar
  18. Guy, A. W., 1987, Measured body to ground current and thermal consequences for human subjects exposed to 3.68 MHz to 144.5 MHz radio-frequency fields, Abstracts of the Ninth Ann. Meet. of BEMS. Portland, Oregon: 31).Google Scholar
  19. Guy, A. W. and Chou, C. K., 1982, Hazard analysis: Very low frequency through medium frequency range, Final Report on USAF SAM Contract F-33615-78-D-0617 Task 0065).Google Scholar
  20. Guy, A. W. and Chou, C. K., 1985, “Very Low Frequency Hazard Study,” final report prepared for USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, on Contract F-33615-83-C-0625).Google Scholar
  21. Hill, D. A., 1984, The effect of frequency and grounding on whole-body absorption of humans in E-polarized radio-frequency fields, Bioelectromagnetics. 5:131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill, D. A. and Walsh, J. A., 1985, Radio-frequency current through the feet of a grounded human, IEEE Trans. Electromag. Comp., 27:18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IRPA, 1984, Interim guidelines on limits of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in the frequency range from 100 kHz to 300 GHz, Health Physics, 46:975.Google Scholar
  24. IRPA, 1988, Guidelines on limits of exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields in the frequency range from 100 kHz to 300 GHz, Health Physics. 54:115.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, C. C. and Guy, A. W., 1972, Nonionizing electromagnetic wave effects on biological materials and systems, Proc. IEEE. 60:692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morton, D. J. Truex, R. C., and Kellner, C. E., 1941, “Manual of Human Cross Section Anatomy,” The Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  27. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1986, “Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields,” NCRP Report No. 86, Bethesda, Maryland).Google Scholar
  28. Orcutt, N., and Gandhi, O. P., 1988, A 3-D impedance method to calculate power deposition in biological bodies subjected to time-varying magnetic fields, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 35:577.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rogers, R. J., 1981, Radio-frequency burn hazards in the MF/HF band, in “Aeromedical Review -- Proceedings Workshop on the Protection of Personnel Against RF Electromagnetic Radiation” J. C. Mitchell, ed., Brooks Air Force Base, Texas.Google Scholar
  30. Stuchly, M. A., 1987, Proposed revision of the Canadian recommendations on radio-frequency exposure protection, Health Physics. 53:649.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sullivan, D., Gandhi, O. P., and Taflove, A., 1988, Use of the finite-difference timedomain method in calculating EM absorption in man models, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 35:179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tell, R., Mantiply, E. D., Durney, C. H., and Massoudi, H., Electric and magnetic field intensities and associated induced body currents in close proximity to a 50 kW AM standard broadcast station, to be published in IEEE Trans. Broad.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Om P. Gandhi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations