Abstract
Peptic ulcers are discrete wounds of the mucosa of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum or, following gastric surgery, of the small intestine which has been anastomosed to the stomach. Peptic ulcers have the common attribute of occurring only in those parts of the alimentary tract which are exposed to gastric secretions. This feature, together with the demonstration that gastric juice has the capacity to destroy animal tissues, has resulted in the belief that peptic ulceration is, in some way, caused by exposure of the affected mucosa to gastric secretions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Annotated Bibliography
Baron JH: Clinical Tests of Gastric Secretion. Macmillan, London, 1978. This comprehensive monograph details the types and results of different secretory studies in controls and patients with ulcer disease.
Brooks FP: The pathophysiology of peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci 30:15S–29S, 1985. An orthodox account of the pathophysiologic abnormalities recorded in patients with peptic ulcers.
Code CF: The role of gastric juice in the experimental production of peptic ulcer. Surg Clin North Am 23:1091–1101, 1943. An early review of the subject, which has been very influential in forming current views of the topic.
Dragstedt LR: The pathogenesis of duodenal and gastric ulcers. Am J Surg 136:286–301, 1978. An authoritative account of the experimental surgical procedures used to determine the relationship between gastric secretion and ulcer disease.
Feinstein AR: Clinical biostatistics. XLVII. Scientific standards vs. statistical associations and biologic logic in the analysis of causation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 25:481–492, 1979. An excellent analysis of the relationships between association of two factors and their potential causal relationship.
Hunt RH, Howden CW, Jones DB, et al: The correlation between acid suppression and peptic ulcer healing. Scand J Gastroenterol 21:(suppl)125:22–29, 1986. An example of the evidence linking therapeutic removal of gastric juice and ulcer healing.
Robert A: Experimental production of duodenal ulcers. Biol Gastroenterol (Paris) 7:145–161, 1974. An excellent review of the different types of experimental approach used to produce duodenal ulcers in animals.
Sackett DL: Bias in analytic research. J Chron Dis 32:51–63, 1979. An excellent account of the different sorts of bias encountered in selecting subjects for clinical studies.
Susser M: Rules of inference in epidemiology. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 6:116–128, 1986. A comprehensive account of the rules for inferring causality in an epidemiologic relationship.
Szabo S: Pathogenesis of duodenal ulcer disease. Lab Invest 51:121–147, 1984. A comprehensive account of the etiologic inferences that can be obtained from modern animal experiments.
Wormsley KG: Duodenal ulcer: Does pathophysiology equal aetiology? Gut 24:775–780, 1983. A critical review of the supposed pathophysiologic bases of duodenal ulceration.
Wormsley KG: Aetiology of ulcers. Bailliere’s 2:555–571, 1988. A comprehensive review of the possible etiologic bases of ulcer disease, assuming that gastric juice is irrelevant for ulcerogenesis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Plenum Publishing Corporation
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Penston, J., Wormsley, K.G. (1989). Acid Hypersecretion Important Factor or Innocent Bystander?. In: Hollander, D., Tarnawski, A.S. (eds) Gastric Cytoprotection. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5697-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5697-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5699-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5697-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive