Histological Assessment of Ovarian Follicle Number in Mice as a Screen for Ovarian Toxicity
Reproductive processes in both males and females are susceptible to interference from chemical insult (1). While there are biological markers of male reproductive toxicity (2,3), there are few markers for female reproductive toxicity (4,5). In addition, current methods for assessing female reproductive vulnerability to xenobiotics are inadequate. For example, some forms of end-organ toxicity (e.g., ovarian, tubal or uterine) are not addressed. For that reason, subtle disruption of reproductive function is not detected in standard reproductive toxicity protocols.
KeywordsAntral Follicle Reproductive Toxicity Glycol Monomethyl Ether Follicle Number Propylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Mattison DR, ed. Reproductive toxicology. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc., 1983.Google Scholar
- 3.Committee on Biological Markers of the National Research Council. Biological markers in environmental health research. Environ Health Perspect 1987; 74:3–9.Google Scholar
- 4.Hatch M. Introduction: biological assessments in female reproductive toxicology. Environ Health Perspect 1987; 75:55–6.Google Scholar
- 8.Takizawa K, Yagi H, Jerina DM, Mattison DR. Experimental ovarian toxicity following intraovarian injection of benzo(a)pyrene or its metabolites in mice and rats. In: Dixon RL, ed. Target organ toxicity: gonads (reproductive and genetic toxicology). New York: Raven Press, 1985:69–94.Google Scholar
- 11.Mattison DR, Nightingale MS. Oocyte destruction by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons is not linked to the inducibility of ovarian aryl hydrocarbon (benzo(a)pyrene) hydroxylase activity in (DBA/2N x C57BL/6N)F1 x DBA/2N backcross mice. Pediatr Pharmacol (New York) 1982; 2:11–21.Google Scholar