Estradiol-Induced Synthesis and Translation of Specific Proteins in the Corpus Luteum

  • M. P. McLean
  • I. Khan
  • T. K. Puryear
  • G. Gibori

Abstract

Throughout pregnancy in the rat, several hormones control luteal cell function (1). Following nidation, locally formed estradiol becomes essential for the activation of the steps necessary for optimal steroid production and for the growth and survival of the corpus luteum (1). Estradiol stimulation of luteal growth is accompanied by a remarkable proliferation of vascular endothelial cells. However, in contrast to its effect on other target cells, estradiol does not elicit luteal cell multiplication but rather cell hypertrophy and a marked increase in protein synthesis. Although the action of estradiol on overall protein synthesis is dramatic, its effect on such diverse parameters as steroidogenesis and vascularization strongly suggests that this steroid may stimulate specific proteins which mediate its broad spectrum of action.

Keywords

Migration Sucrose Estrogen EDTA Electrophoresis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gibori G, Khan I, Warshaw ML, et al. Placental derived regulators and the complex control of luteal cell function. Recent Prog Horm Res 1988; 44:377–429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gibori G, Keyes PL. Role of intraluteal estrogen in the regulation of the rat corpus luteum during pregnancy. Endocrinology 1978; 102:1176–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gibori G, Chen Y-DI, Khan I, Azhar S, Reaven GM. Regulation of luteal cell lipoprotein receptors, sterol contents, and steroidogenesis by estradiol in the pregnant rat. Endocrinology 1984; 114:607–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khan I, Sridaran R, Johnson DC, Gibori G. Selective stimulation of luteal androgen biosynthesis by luteinizing hormone: comparison of hormonal regulation of P450170t in corpora lutea and follicles. Endocrinology 1987; 121:1312–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heischner S, Kervina M. Subcellular fractionation of rat liver. Methods Enzymol 1974; 3:6–41.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hubbard AL, Cohn ZA. Externally disposed plasma membrane proteins. J Cell Biol 1975; 64:438–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227:680–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chamberlain JP. Fluorographic detection of radioactivity in Polyacrylamide gels with the water-soluble fluor, sodium salicylate. Anal Biochem 1979; 95:132–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bradford MN. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72:248–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chirgwin JM, Przbyla AC, MacDonald RJ, Rutter WJ. Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 1979; 18:5294–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vignon F, Capony F, Chambon M, Freiss G, Garcia M, Rochefort H. Autocrine growth stimulation of the MCF-7 breast cancer cells by estrogen-regulated 52 K protein. Endocrinology 1986; 118:1537–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sheen YY, Katzenellenbogen BS. Antiestrogen stimulation of the production of a 37,000 molecular weight secreted protein and estrogen stimulation of the production of a 32,000 molecular weight secreted protein in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Endocrinology 1987; 120:1140–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. P. McLean
    • 1
  • I. Khan
    • 1
  • T. K. Puryear
    • 1
  • G. Gibori
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and Biophysics, College of MedicineUniversity of IllinoisChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations