In Vitro Growth of Coriolus Versicolor, a Wood-Decay Fungus, Responds Differentially to Catechol and Tannic Acid

  • Rosannah Taylor
  • Gerald C. Llewellyn
  • Charles E. O’Rear
  • John E. Mayfield
  • Kevin T. Smith
  • Arthur L. Williams
  • William V. Dashek


Both decay and disease of trees are of great economic importance to the commercial wood products industry. Certain micro-organisms such as the white-rot fungi can literally live upon wood via their abilities to secrete cellulolytic and ligninolytic enzymes (Highley and Kirk, 1979). The capacity of white-rot fungi to degrade lignin involves in part their elaboration of an extra-cellular polyphenol oxidase (Agrios,.1978; Highley and Kirk, 1979; Nobles, 1958, 1965).


Phenolic Compound Tannic Acid Gallic Acid Mycelial Growth Malt Extract 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agrios, G.N. (1978). Plant Pathology. 2nd ed. Academic Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  2. Alfenas, A.C., Hubbes, M. and Couto, L. (1982). Effect of phenolic compounds from Eucalyptus on the mycelial growth and conidial germination of Cyphonectria cubensis. Can. J. Bot., 60, 2535–2541.Google Scholar
  3. Bega, R.V. and Tavy, J. (1966). Influence of pine root oleoresis on Fomes annosus. Phytopathol., 56, 870.Google Scholar
  4. Cheo, P.C. (1982). Effects of tannic acid on rhizomorph production by Armillaria mellea. Phytopathol., 72, 676–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davidson, R.W., Campbell, W.A. and Blaisdell, V.T. (1938).Google Scholar
  6. Differentiation of wood-decaying fungi by their reactions on gallic or tannic acid medium. J. Agric. Res., 57, 683–695.Google Scholar
  7. Dix, N.J. (1979). Inhibition of fungi by gallic acid in relation to growth on leaves and litter. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc., 73, 329–336.Google Scholar
  8. Fries, N. (1973). Organic compounds on growth and development of fungi. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc., 60, 1–21.Google Scholar
  9. Hart, J.H. and Shrimpton, D.M. (1974). Role of stilbenes in resistance of wood-decay. Phytopathol. 69, 1138–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Highley, T.L. and Kirk, T.K. (1979). Mechanism of wood decay and the unique features of heart-rot. Phytopathol., 69, 1151–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hofman, K.H. and Schauer, F. (1988). Utilization of phenol by hydrocarbon assimilating yeast. Antionie Van Leewenhoek, 54, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuc, J., Ullstrup, A.J., and Quackenbush, F.W. (1955). Production of fungistatic substances by plant tissue after inoculation. Sci., 122, 1186–1187.Google Scholar
  13. Li, C.Y., Lu, K.C., Nelson, E.E., Bollen, W.B. and Trappe, J.M. (1969). Effects of phenolic and other compounds on growth of Poria wierdii in vitro. Microbios., 1, 305–311.Google Scholar
  14. Lindberg, G. (1949). Influence of enzymatically oxidized gallic acid on the growth of some hymenomycetes. Svensik Forestalia Svecrca, 29, 1–95.Google Scholar
  15. Link, K.P., Angell, H.R. and Walker, J.C. (1929). The isolation of protocatechuic acid from pigmented onion scales and its significance in relation to disease resistance in onions. J. Biol. Chem., 81, 369–365.Google Scholar
  16. Marbach, I., Harel, E. and Mayer, A.M. (1983). Inducer and culture medium dependent properites of extracellular laccase from Botrytis cinerea. Phytochem., 22, 1535–1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nobles, M.R. (1958). A rapid test for extracellular oxidase in culture of wood inhabiting hymenomycetes. Can. J. Bot., 36, 91–99.Google Scholar
  18. Nobles, M.K. (1965). Identification of cultures of wood inhabiting hymenomycetes. Can. J. Bot., 43, 1097–1139.Google Scholar
  19. Rennefelt, E. and Nachi, G. (1955). The fungicidal activity of some constituents from heartwood of conifers. Svensk Bot. Tidski, 49, 419–432.Google Scholar
  20. Robbins, W.J. and Harvey, A. (1958). Wood, tomato and malt extract and growth of some basidiomycetes. Mycologia, 50, 742–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shain, L. (1967). Resistance of sapwood in stems of loblolly pine to infection by Fomes annosus. Phytopathol., 57, 1034–1045.Google Scholar
  22. Shigo, A.L. (1974). Relative abilities of Phialophora melinii, Fomes connatus and F. igniarius to invade freshly wounded tissues of Acer rubrum. Phytopathol., 64, 708–710.Google Scholar
  23. Shortle, W.C., Tattar, T.A. and Rich, A.E. (1971). Effects of some phenolic compounds on the growth of Phialophora melinii and Fomes connatus. Phytopathol., 61, 552–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith, K.T., Blanchard, R.O. and Shortle, W.C. (1981) Postulated mechanism of biological control of decay fungi in red maple wounds treated with Trichoderma harzianum. Phytopathol., 71, 496–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1979). Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, R., Llewellyn, G.C., Mayfield, J.E., Shortle, W.C. and Dashek, W.V. (1987a). Attempts to determine whether the products of extracellular polyphenol oxidase modulate the catechol-induced bimodal growth response of Coriolus versicolor. Biodeteridration Research I, pp. 43–62, Plenum Press, NY.Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, R., Llewellyn, G., Mayfield, J.E., Shortle, W.C. and Dashek, W.V. (1987b). Time-dependent appearance of extracellular polyphenol oxidase in relation to the bimodal growth response of Coriolus versicolor to catechol. Biodeterioration Research I, pp. 63–74, Plenum Press, NY.Google Scholar
  28. Williams, A.H. (1963). Enzyme inhibition by phenolic compounds. Ina Enzyme Chemistry of Phenolic Compounds. pp. 87–95. ( J.B. Pridham, ed.). Pergamon Press, Oxford, London, N.Y. and Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosannah Taylor
    • 1
  • Gerald C. Llewellyn
    • 2
  • Charles E. O’Rear
    • 3
  • John E. Mayfield
    • 4
  • Kevin T. Smith
    • 5
  • Arthur L. Williams
    • 6
  • William V. Dashek
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of BiologyAtlanta UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Bureau of Toxic Substances InformationVirginia Department of HealthRichmondUSA
  3. 3.Department of Forensic SciencesGeorge Washington UniversityUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologyNorth Carolina Central UniversityDurhamUSA
  5. 5.Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment StationUnited States Department of AgricultureDurhamUSA
  6. 6.Department of BiologyAtlanta UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations