Advertisement

Production of ß-Galactosidase Fused Protein A and the Purification of it in an Aqueous Two-Phase System

  • Andres Veide
  • Lars Strandberg
  • Halldis Hellebust
  • Sven-Olof Enfors

Abstract

We have studied the production of the genetically fused protein Staphylococcal protein A/Escherichia coli ß-galactosidase (SpA-ßgal). The cultivation conditions were found to have a profound effect on the overall productivity of SpA-ßgal. Biologically active SpA-ßgal was produced corresponding to 12% of the cell dry weight. The purification of SpA-ßgal was based on the partitioning properties of ß-galactosidase during extraction in an aqueous two-phase system consisting of poly(ethylene glycol) 4000 and potassium phosphate. Stability studies of SpA-ßgal revealed that the ß-galactosidase moiety remained intact both with respect to size and enzyme activity, while the SpA moiety was completely degraded by E. coli proteases.

Keywords

Potassium Phosphate Cell Debris Phase System Bottom Phase Binodial Curve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Moks, L. Abrahmsén, B. Österlöf, S. Josephson, M. Östling, S.-O. Enfors, I.-L. Persson, B. Nilsson and M. Uhlén, Large-scale affinity purification of human insuline-like growth factor I from culture medium of E. coli, Bio/technology 5:379 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.W. Zabriskie and E.J. Arcuri, Factors influencing productivity of fermentations employing recombinant microorganisms, Enzyme Microbiol Technol. 8:706 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Veide, T. Lindbäck and S.-O. Enfors, Continuous extraction of ß-galactosidase from E. coli in an aqeuous two-phase system: effects of biomass concentration on partitioning and mass transfer, Enzyme Microb Technol. 6:325 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Strandberg, A. Veide and S.-O. Enfors, Production of the hybrid protein Staphylococcal protein A/Escherichia coli ß-galactosidase with E. coli, J. Biotechnol. in pressGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Nilsson, L. Abrahamsén and M. Uhlén, Immobilisation and purification of enzymes with Staphylococcal protein A gene fusion vectors, EMBO 4:1075 (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Uhlén, The gene for Staphylococcal protein A and its use in biotechnology, Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (1984)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.V. Salmond, R.G. Kroll and I. Booth, The effect of food preservatives on pH homeostasis in Escherchia coli, J. Gen. Microbiol. 130:2845 (1984)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Yano, H. Mori, T. Kobayashi and S. Shimizu, Reusability of broth supernatant as medium, J. Ferment. Technol. 58:259 (1980)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Veide, L. Strandberg and S.-O. Enfors, Extraction of ß-galactosidase fused protein A in aqueous two-phase systems, Enzyme Microb. Technol. in pressGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.-R. Kula, K.H. Kroner and H. Hustedt, Purification of enzymes by liquid/liquid extraction, in: “Advances in Biotechnology,” A. Fiechter, ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1972)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Hustedt, K.H. Kroner, U. Menge and M.-R. Kula, Aqueous two-phase systems for large-scale enzyme isolation processes, in: “1st European Congress on Biotechnology-Preprints (Part 1)” (1978)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P.-Å. Albertsson and G.D. Baird, Countercurrent distribution of cells, Exp. Cell Res. 28:296 (1962)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K.-E. Magnusson and O. Stendahl, Partitioning of bacteria, virus and phage, in: “Partitioning in Aqueous Two-Phase Systems,” H. Walter, D.E. Brooks and D. Fisher, eds., Academic Press, London (1985)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.M. Bradford, A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilising the principle of protein-dye binding, Anal. Biochem. 72:248 (1976)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Veide, A.-L. Smeds and S.-O. Enfors, A process for large-scale isolation of ß-galactosidase from E. coli in an aqueous two-phase system, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25:1789 (1983)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.-P. Tenu, O.M. Viratelle and J. Yon, Kinetic study of the activation process of ß-galactosidase from E. coli by Mg2+, Eur. J. Biochem. 26:112 (1972)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G.S. Case, M.L. Sinott and J.-P. Tenu, The role of magnesium ions in ß-galactosidase-catalysed hydrolyses, Biochem. J., 133:99 (1973)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.L. Goldberg, K.H.S. Swamy, C.H. Chung and F.S. Larimore, Proteases in Escherichia coli, Methods in Enzymology 80:680 (1981)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.E. Roseman and R.L. Levine, Purification of a protease from Escherichia coli with specificity for oxydised glutamine synthetase, J. Biol. Chem. 262:2110 (1987)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Y. Katayama-Fujimura, S. Gottesman and M.R. Maurizi, A multiple-component, ATP-dependent protease from Escherichia coli, J. Biol. Chem. 262:4477 (1987)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. Waxman and A.L. Goldberg, Selectivity of intracellular proteolysis: protein substrates activate the ATP-dependent protease (La), Science, 232:500 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andres Veide
    • 1
  • Lars Strandberg
    • 1
  • Halldis Hellebust
    • 1
  • Sven-Olof Enfors
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and BiotechnologyThe Royale Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations