Advertisement

Proprietary Prisons

  • Charles H. Logan
Part of the Law, Society and Policy book series (LSPO, volume 4)

Abstract

The concept of hiring private contractors to manage prisons can be traced back at least as far as Jeremy Bentham (Roper, 1986: 85–88). More broadly defined, the private administration of punishment goes back, of course, much further. The notion that punishing criminals is the exclusive prerogative of the state is an invention of the state. That is, its origins are not ancient but coincident with the development of modern nation-states. Private involvement in punishment, however, continued even after the rise of the state. In the early years of this nation, many functions that are now widely regarded as public (i.e., state or government) responsibilities were then provided by private agencies and organizations, both communal and proprietary. Examples would include education, highways, police and fire protection, dispute resolution, and at least some kinds of punishment. Also, the nineteenth-century practice, more common in southern states, of contracting out the labor of prisoners to private employers, is often cited as historical precedent for the contemporary privatization of corrections.

Keywords

Deadly Force Private Contractor Grand Jury Private Prison Correctional Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Correctional Association. Private operation of a correctional institution. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. Camp, G., and Camp, C. The real cost of corrections: A research report. South Salem, NY: Criminal Justice Institute, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. Lipset, S. M. Feeling better: Measuring the nation’s confidence. Public Opinion, 1985, April/May, pp. 6–9, 56–58.Google Scholar
  4. Lipset, S. M., and Schneider, W. The confidence gap: Business, labor, and government in the public mind. New York: The Free Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. Logan, C. H. The propriety of proprietary prisons. Federal Probation, 1987, 51, 35–39.Google Scholar
  6. Logan, C. H., and Rausch, S. P. Punish and profit: The emergence of private enterprise prisons. Justice Quarterly, 1985, 2, 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mullen, J., Chabotar, K., and Carrow, D. The privatization of corrections. Washington, DC: Abt Associates, for the National Institute of Justice, 1985.Google Scholar
  8. Roper, B. A. Market forces, privatization and prisons: A polar case for government policy. International Journal of Social Economics, 1986, 13, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Savas, E. S. Privatizing the public sector; How to shrink government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, Inc., 1982.Google Scholar
  10. Virginia, Commonwealth of. Study of correctional privatization. Richmond, VA: Secretary of Transportation and Public Safety, 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles H. Logan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations