Advertisement

The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation

Reconsidering the “Nothing Works” Debate
  • Francis T. Cullen
  • Paul Gendreau
Part of the Law, Society and Policy book series (LSPO, volume 4)

Abstract

From its inception in the 1820s, the American prison was meant to be more than a sturdy cage of high, thick, stone walls in which the wayward could be restrained. The prison’s founders called their invention a “penitentiary,” a label that embodied their optimism that this carefully planned social institution had the power to reform even the most wicked spirit (Rothman, 1971).

Keywords

Criminal Justice Correctional Treatment Crime Control Juvenile Offender Criminal Justice Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, J. F., and Parsons, B. V. Functional family therapy. Monterrey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, F. A. The decline of the rehabilitative ideal: Penal policy and social purpose. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  3. American Friends Service Committee Working Party. Struggle for justice: A report on crime and punishment in America. New York: Hill and Wang, 1971.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, D. A. The friendship model of voluntary action and controlled evaluations of correctional practices: Notes on relationships with behavior theory and criminology. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services, 179.Google Scholar
  5. Andrews, D. A. Some experimental investigations of the principles of differential association through deliberate manipulations of the structure of service systems. American Sociological Review, 1980, 45, 448–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrews, D. A., and Kiessling, J. J. Program structure and effective correctional practices. A summary of the CAVIL research. In R. R. Ross and P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment. Toronto: Butterworths, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. Annis, H., and Davis, C. S. Assessment of expectancies in alcohol dependent clients. In G. A. Marlatt and D. M. Donovan (Eds.), Assessment of addictive behaviors. New York: Guilford, 1988a.Google Scholar
  8. Annis, H. M., and Davis, C. S. Relapse prevention. In R. K. Hester and W. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches. New York: Pergamon Press, 1988b.Google Scholar
  9. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 191–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bandura, A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
  11. Bayer, R. Crime, punishment and the decline of liberal optimism. Cr ne and Delinquency, 1981, 27, 169–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berk, R. A., and Rossi, P. H. Prison reform and state elites. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1977.Google Scholar
  13. Bynum, T. S., Greene, J. R., and Cullen, F. T. Correlates of legislative crime control ideology. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 1986, 3, 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clear, T. Statistical prediction in corrections. Research in Corrections, 1988, 1, 1–39. Conrad, J. P. Corrections and simple justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1973, 64, 208–217.Google Scholar
  15. Cressey, D. R. The nature and effectiveness of correctional techniques. Law and Contemporary Problems, 1958, 23, 754–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Criminal Justice Newsletter “Election-year politics could mar sentencing reform, Meese warns,” 1987, June 15, p. 3.Google Scholar
  17. Cullen, F. T., and Gilbert, K. E. Reaffirming rehabilitation. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Company, 1982.Google Scholar
  18. Cullen, F. T., Golden, K. M., and Cullen, J. B. Is child saving dead? Attitudes toward juvenile rehabilitation in Illinois. Journal of Criminal Justice, 1983, 11, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cullen, F. T., Bynum, T. S., Garrett, K. M., and Greene, J. R. Legislative ideology and criminal justice policy; Implications from Illinois. In E. Fairchild and V. J. Webb (Eds.), The politics of crime and criminal justice. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1985.Google Scholar
  20. Cullen, F. T., Clark, G. A., and Wozniak, J. F. Explaining the get tough movement: Can the public be blamed? Federal Probation, 1985, 49, 16–24.Google Scholar
  21. Cullen, F. T., Cullen, J. B., and Wozniak, J. F. Is rehabilitation dead: The myth of the punitive public. Journal of Criminal Justice, 1988, 16, 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cullen, F. T., Skovron, S. E., Scott, J. E., and Burton, V. S., Jr. Public support for correctional treatment: The tenacity of rehabilitative ideology. Criminal Justice and Behavior,in press.Google Scholar
  23. Currie, E. Confronting crime: An American challenge. New York: Pantheon Books, 1985.Google Scholar
  24. Davidson, W. S., Redner, R., Blakely, C., Mitchell, C., and Emshoff, J. Diversion of juvenile offenders: An experimental comparison. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1987, 55, 68–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis, G. E., and Leitenberg, H. Adolescent sex offenders. Psychological Bulletin, 1987, 101, 417–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duffee, D. E. Explaining criminal justice: Community theory and criminal justice reform. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, and Hain, 1980.Google Scholar
  27. Duffee, D. E., and Ritti, R. R. Correctional policy and public values. Criminology, 1977, 14, 449–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Empey, L. T. Foreword—From optimism to despair: New doctrines in juvenile justice. In C. A. Murray and L. A. Cox, Jr., Beyond probation: Juvenile corrections and the chronic delinquent. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979.Google Scholar
  29. Eron, L. D. The development of aggressive behavior from the perspective of a developing behaviorism. American Psychologist, 1987, 42, 435–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Finckenauer, J. O. Crime as a national political issue: 1964–76—from law and order to domestic tranquility. Crime and Delinquency, 1978, 24, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Flanagan, T. J., and Caulfield, S. L. Public opinion and prison policy: A review. Prison Journal, 1984, 64, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Flanagan, T. J., and McGarrell, E. F. Attitudes of New York legislators toward crime and criminal justice: A report of the state legislator survey-1985. Albany: Hindelang Criminal Justice Research Center, 1986.Google Scholar
  33. Fogel, D. “We are the living proof”: The justice model for corrections. Second edition. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Company, 1979.Google Scholar
  34. Friedrichs, D. O. The law and the legitimacy crisis: A critical issue for criminal justice. In R. G. lacovetta and D. H. Chang (Eds.), Critical issues in criminal Justice. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  35. Gallup Report.Public backs wholesale prison reform. 1982, 22,pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  36. Garrett, C. J. Effects of residential treatment on adjudicated delinquents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1985, 22, 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gendreau, P. Treatment in corrections: Martinson was wrong! Canadian Psychology, 1981, 22, 332–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gendreau, P., and Ross, R. R. Effective correctional treatment. Bibliotherapy for cynics. Crime and Delinquency, 1979, 25, 463–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gendreau, P., and Ross, R. R. Correctional potency: Treatment and deterrence on trial. In R. Roesch and R. R. Corrado (Eds.), Evaluation in criminal justice policy. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1981.Google Scholar
  40. Gendreau, P., and Ross, R. R. Correctional treatment. Some recommendations for successful intervention. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 1984, 34, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gendreau, P., and Ross, R. R. Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 1987, 4, 349–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gold, M. A time for skepticism. Crime and Delinquency, 1974, 20, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goldstein, A. P. Psychological skill training and the aggressive adolescent. In S. Apter and B. Harootunian (Eds.), Youth violence: Program and prospects. New York: Pergamon, 1986.Google Scholar
  44. Goodstein, L., and Hepburn, J. Determinate sentencing and imprisonment: A failure of reform. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Company, 1985.Google Scholar
  45. Gottfredson, D. C. An empirical test of school-based environmental and individual interventions to reduce the risk of delinquent behavior. Criminology, 1986, 24, 705–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gottfredson, S. D., and Taylor, R. B. The correctional crisis: Prison populations and public policy. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, 1983.Google Scholar
  47. Gould, S. J. The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton, 1981.Google Scholar
  48. Greenberg, D. F., and Humphries, D. The co-optation of fixed sentencing reform. Crime and Delinquency, 1980, 26, 206–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Greenwood, P. W., and Zimring, F. E. One more chance: The pursuit of promising intervention strategies for chronic juvenile offenders. Santa Monica: Rand, 1985.Google Scholar
  50. Halleck, S. L., and Witte, A. D. Is rehabilitation dead? Crime and Delinquency, 1977, 23, 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hamm, M. S. Attitudes of Indiana legislators toward crime and criminal justice: A Report of the state legislator survey-1986. Terre Haute: Department of Criminology, Indiana State University, 1986.Google Scholar
  52. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Jones, G., and Fine, D. Delinquency prevention through parent training: Results and issues from work in progress. In J. Q. Wilson and G. C. Loury (Eds.), From children to citizens. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
  53. Izzo, R., and Ross, R. Meta-analysis of correctional treatment programs for juvenile delinquents. Ottawa: Department of Criminology, University of Ottawa, 1987.Google Scholar
  54. Lab, S. P., and Whitehead, J. T. An analysis of juvenile correctional treatment. Crime and Delinquency, 1988, 34, 60–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lally, R. Family development research program: Brief summary of incidence, severity, and cost of juvenile delinquency in program and control children. Paper presented at National Association for the Education of Young Children, Washington, DC: 1986.Google Scholar
  56. Latessa, E. J. The effectiveness of intensive supervision with high risk probationers. In B. R. McCarthy (Ed.), Intermediate punishments: Intensive supervision, home confinement, and electronic surveillance. Monsey, NJ: Criminal Justice Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  57. Lipton, D., Martinson, R., and Wilks, J. The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A survey of treatment evaluation studies. New York: Praeger, 1975.Google Scholar
  58. Loeber, R. What policy-makers and practitioners can learn from family studies of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. In J. Q. Wilson and G. C. Loury (Eds.), From children to citizens. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
  59. MacKenzie, D. L., Gould, L. S., Riechers, L. M., and Shaw, J. Evaluating shock incarceration in Louisiana: A review of the first year. Baton Rouge: Department of Criminal Justice and Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University, 1988.Google Scholar
  60. Marshall, W. L., and Barbaree, H. E. The long-term evaluation of a cognitive-behavioral treatment program for child molesters. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1988, 26, 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Martinson, R. What works?—Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 1974, 35, 22–54.Google Scholar
  62. Martinson, R. New findings, new views: A note of caution regarding sentencing reform. Hofstra Law Review, 1979, 7, 243–258.Google Scholar
  63. McGarrell, E. F., and Flanagan, T. J. Measuring and explaining legislator crime control ideology. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1987, 24, 102–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Michigan Prison and Jail Overcrowding Project. Perceptions of criminal justice surveys: Executive summary. Traverse City: Michigan Prison and Jail Overcrowding Project Inc., 1985.Google Scholar
  65. Miller, W. R. Behavioral alcohol treatment research advances: Barriers to utilization. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 1987, 9, 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Palmer, T. The “effectiveness” issue today: An overview. Federal Probation, 1983, 46, 310.Google Scholar
  67. Pearson, F. S. Final report of research on New Jersey’s Intensive Supervision Program. New Brunswick, NJ: Institute for Criminological Research, Department of Sociology, Rutgers University, 1987.Google Scholar
  68. Peele, S. A moral vision of addiction: How people’s values determine whether they become and remain addicts. Journal of Drug Issues, 1987, 17, 187–215.Google Scholar
  69. Pithers, W. D., Kashima, K. M., Cumming, G. F., Beal, L. S., and Buell, M. M. Relapse prevention of sexual aggression. South Burlington: Vermont Department of Corrections, 1987.Google Scholar
  70. Platt, J. J., and Metzger, D. S. Cognitive interpersonal problem-solving skills and the maintenance of treatment success in heroin addicts. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 1987, 1, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Platt, J. J., Prout, M. F., and Metzger, D. S. Interpersonal cognitive problem-solving therapy (ICPS). In W. Dryden and W. Golden (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral approaches to psychotherapy. London: Harper & Row, 1986.Google Scholar
  72. Platt, J. J., Taube, D. O., Metzger, D. S., and Duome, M. Training in interpersonal cognitive problem-solving (TIPS). Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. Forthcoming. Plattner, M. F. The rehabilitation of punishment. Public Interest, 1976, 44, 104–114.Google Scholar
  73. Public Agenda Foundation. Crime and Punishment: The Public’s view. New York: Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, 1987.Google Scholar
  74. Public Opinion Opinion roundup: Crime and punishment. 1987, 10, 26.Google Scholar
  75. Public Opinion Research. Confidential analytical report prepared for North Carolina Center on Crime and Punishment. Washington, DC: Public Opinion Research, 1986.Google Scholar
  76. Quinney, R. Class, state, and crime: On the theory and practice of criminal justice. New York: David McKay Co., 1977.Google Scholar
  77. Rankin, J. H. Changing attitudes toward capital punishment. Social Forces, 1979, 58, 194211.Google Scholar
  78. Rauma, D., and Berk, R. A. Remuneration and recidivism: The long-term impact of unemployment compensation on ex-offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1987, 3, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Regnery, A. S. Getting away with murder: Why the justice system needs an overhaul. Policy Review, 1985, 34, 1–4.Google Scholar
  80. Riley, P. J., and Rose, V. M. Public and elite opinion concerning correctional reform: Implications for social policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 1980, 8, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Robison, J., and Smith, G. The effectiveness of correctional programs. Crime and Delinquency, 1971, 17, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ross, R. R., and Fabiano, E. A. Time to think: A cognitive model of delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Johnson City, TN: Institute of Social Science and Arts, 1985.Google Scholar
  83. Ross, R. R., and Gendreau, P. Effective correctional treatment. Toronto: Butterworths, 1980.Google Scholar
  84. Rothman, D. J. The discovery of the asylum: Social order and disorder in the new republic. Boston: Little, Brown, 1971.Google Scholar
  85. Rothman, D. J. The state as parent: Social policy in the progressive era. In W. Gaylin, I. Glassner, S. Marcus, and D. Rothman, Doing good: The limits of benevolence. New York: Pantheon, 1978.Google Scholar
  86. Rothman, D. J. Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternatives in progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown, 1980.Google Scholar
  87. Rowe, D. C. Resolving the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 1987, 42, 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Scheingold, S. A. The politics of law and order: Street crime and public policy. New York: Longman, 1984.Google Scholar
  89. Schneider, A. L. Restitution and recidivism rates of juvenile offenders: Results from four experimental studies. Criminology, 1986, 24, 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schweinhart, L. Can preschool programs help prevent delinquency? In J. Q. Wilson and G. C. Loury (Eds.), From children to citizens. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
  91. Serrill, M. S. Washington’s new juvenile code. Correctional Magazine, 1980, 6, 36–41.Google Scholar
  92. Skovron, S. E., Scott, J. E., and Cullen, F. T. Prison crowding: Public attitudes toward strategies of population control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1988, 25, 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Stinchcombe, A. L., Adams, R., Heimer, C. A., Scheppele, K. L., Smith, T. W., and Taylor, D. G. Crime and punishment: Changing attitudes in America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.Google Scholar
  94. Stumphauzer, J. Helping delinquents change: A treatment manual of social learning approaches. New York: Haworth, 1987.Google Scholar
  95. Thomson, D. R., and Ragona, A. J. Popular moderation versus governmental authoritarianism: An interactionist view of public sentiments toward criminal sanctions. Crime and Delinquency, 1987, 33, 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Toby, J. Is punishment necessary? Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1964, 55, 332–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tolan, P. H., Perry, M. S., and Jones, T. Delinquency prevention: An example of consultation in rural community mental health. Journal of Community Psychology, 1987, 15, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Van Voorhis, P. Correctional effectiveness: The high cost of ignoring success. Federal Probation, 1987, 51, 56–62.Google Scholar
  99. von Hirsch, A. Doing justice: The choice of punishments. New York: Hill and Wang, 1976.Google Scholar
  100. von Hirsch, A. Past or future crimes: Deservedness and dangerousness in the sentencing of criminals. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  101. Walker, S. Sense and nonsense about crime: A policy guide. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1985.Google Scholar
  102. Wideman, J. E. Brothers and keepers. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1984.Google Scholar
  103. Wilson, J. Q. Thinking about crime. New York: Vintage Books, 1975.Google Scholar
  104. Wilson, J. Q. Strategic opportunities for delinquency prevention. In J. Q. Wilson and G. C. Loury (Eds.), From children to citizens. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
  105. Wootton, B. Social science and social pathology. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1959.Google Scholar
  106. Zigler, E., and Hall, N. W. The implication of early intervention efforts for the primary prevention of juvenile delinqency. In J. Q. Wilson and G. C. Loury (Eds.), From children to citizens. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
  107. Zimmerman, S. E., van Alstyne, D. J., and Dunn, C. S. The national punishment survey and public policy consequences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1988, 25, 120–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francis T. Cullen
    • 1
  • Paul Gendreau
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Centracare Saint John Inc.Saint JohnCanada

Personalised recommendations