Advertisement

On the Nature of Cochlear Resonance

  • E. de Boer
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA)

Abstract

In this paper attention is paid to details of the shape of the response peak in cochlear models, in particular, the relation between response amplitude and phase. This is done for several types of cochlear model and the results are to be compared with experimental data on basilar membrane (BM) motion. The models used will be linear because a linear filter describes well the fundamental elements of cochlear filtering. As a matter of fact, for stimuli comprising a multitude of components, the cochlear response can be well predicted by a model containing a linear filter as its main frequency-selective element (de Boer and de Jongh, 1978).

Keywords

Active Model Imaginary Axis Response Peak Basilar Membrane Stylize Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. De Boer, E. (1979). Travelling waves and cochlear resonance. In: Models of the Auditory System and Related Signal Processing Techniques (Eds: Hoke, M. and De Boer, E.) Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 9, pp. 17-33.Google Scholar
  2. De Boer, E. (1983). No sharpening? A challenge for cochlear mechanics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 567–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Boer, E. and de Jongh, H.R. (1978). On cochlear encoding: Potentialities and limitations of the reverse-correlation technique. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 115–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diependaal, R.J., Viergever, M.A. and De Boer, E. (1986). Are active elements necessary in the basilar membrane impedance? J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diependaal R.J., De Boer, E. and Viergever, M.A. (1987). Cochlear power flux as an indicator of mechanical activity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 917–926.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Robles, L., Ruggero, M.A. and Rich, N.C. (1986). Mössbauer measurements of the mechanical response to single-tone and two-tone stimuli at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. In: Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms (Eds: Allen, J.B., Hall, J.L., Hubbard, A., Neely, S.T. and Tubis, A.) Springer Berlin, pp. 121–128.Google Scholar
  7. Sellick, P.M., Yates, G.K. and Patuzzi, R. (1983). The influence of Mössbauer source size and position on phase and amplitude measurements of the guinea pig basilar membrane. Hear. Res. 10, 101–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Steele, C.R. and Taber, L.A. (1979-a). Comparison of WKB and finite difference calculations for a two-dimensional cochlear model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 65, 1001–1006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Steele, C.R. and Taber, L.A. (1979-b). Three-dimensional model calculations for guinea pig cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 65, 1007–1111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuortes, M.G.F. and Hodgkin, A.L. (1964) Changes in time scale and sensitivity in the ommatidia of Limulus. J. Physiol. 172: 239–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Guillemin, E.A. (1957) Network Synthesis. Wiley, N.Y. Table 1, p. 66.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, E.R. (1988) Tuning in the bullfrog ear. Biophys. J. 53: 441–447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. de Boer
    • 1
  1. 1.Academic Medical CentreAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations