Advertisement

Saturation of Receptor Currents Accounts for Two-Tone Suppression

  • G. K. Yates
  • C. D. Geisler
  • R. B. Patuzzi
  • B. M. Johnstone
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA)

Abstract

In a preceding paper of this symposium (Patuzzi et al., this volume), evidence was given of an intimate connection between the electrical activity of the outer hair cells (OHCs) and the threshold sensitivities of primary fibers in the neighborhood of the OHCs. Small reductions in the responsiveness of the OHCs (as indicated by small reductions in the magnitudes of the locally recorded cochlear microphonic potentials) were used, through presumed high-gain active feedback processes, to account for large reductions observed in the neural thresholds near the characteristic frequencies (CFs) of the fibers. In this paper we will present evidence that the “two-tone rate suppression” (2TRS) which is observed in the response discharges of these primary fibers is a natural consequence of the limited dynamic range of the electrical drive to these same active processes: that is, a saturation of feedback (cf. Zwicker, 1979).

Keywords

Hair Cell Outer Hair Cell Cochlear Microphonic Synchronization Signal Single Tone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cheatham, M. A. and Dallos, P. (1982) Two-tone interactions in the cochlear microphonic. Hearing.Res. 8, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dallos, P., Cheatham, M.A. and Ferraro, J. (1974) Cochlear mechanics, nonlinearities and cochlear potentials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55, 597–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Engebretson, A.M. and Eldredge, D.H. (1968) Model for the nonlinear characteristics of cochlear potentials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 548–554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Geisler, C.D. and Greenberg, S.G. (1986) A two-stage nonlinear cochlear model possesses automatic gain control. J. Acoust Soc. Am. 80, 1359–1363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Geisler, C.D., Patuzzi, R.B., Yates, G.K. and Johnstone, B.M. (1988) Relationships between two-tone suppression and outer hair cell function. Hearing Res. (submitted).Google Scholar
  6. Johnstone, J.R., Alder, V.A., Johnstone, B.M., Robertson, D. and Yates, G.K. (1979) Cochlear action potential threshold and single unit thresholds. J. Acoust Soc. Am. 65, 254–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Patuzzi, R.B., Yates, G.K. and Johnstone, B.M. (1988) The origin of low-frequency microphonic potentials measured in the first turn of the guinea pig cochlea. Hearing Res. (submitted).Google Scholar
  8. Patuzzi, R.B., Yates, G.K. and Johnstone, B.M. (1988) Outer hair cell receptor current and its effect on cochlear mechanics. This volume.Google Scholar
  9. Russell, I.J., Cody, A.R. and Richardson, G.P. (1986) The responses of inner and outer hair cells in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea and in the mouse cochlea grown in vitro. Hearing Res. 22, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sachs, M.B. and Kiang, N.Y.S. (1968) Two-tone inhibition in auditory nerve fibers. J. Acoust Soc. Am. 43, 1120–1128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schmiedt, R.A. (1982) Boundaries of two-tone rate suppression of cochlear-nerve activity. Hearing Res. 7, 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sellick, P.M. and Russell, I.J. (1979) Two-tone suppression in cochlear hair cells. Hearing Res. 1, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zwicker, E. (1979) A model describing nonlinearities in hearing by active processes with saturation at 40 dB. Biol Cybem. 35, 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Robertson, D. and Johnstone, B.M. (1980) Primary auditory neurons: nonlinear responses altered without changes in sharp tuning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 69, 1096–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sachs, M.B. and Kiang, N.Y.-S. (1968) Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 43, 1120–1128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Allen, J.B. and Fahey, P.F. (1983) Nonlinear behaviour at threshold determined in the auditory canal and on the auditory nerve. In: Hearing — Physiological Bases and Psychoacoustics. Eds. R. Klinke and R. Hartmann, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 128–133.Google Scholar
  17. Deng, L. and Geisler, C.D. (1985) Changes in the phase of excitor-tone responses in cat auditory-nerve fibers by suppressor tones and fatigue. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 78, 1633–1643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geisler, C.D., Patuzzi, R.B., Yates, G.K. and Johnstone, B.M. (1988) Relationships between two-tone suppression and outer hair cell function. Hearing Res. (submitted).Google Scholar
  19. Schmiedt, R.A. (1982) Boundaries of two-tone rate suppression of cochlear-nerve activity. Hearing Res., 7, 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mountain, D.C., Hubbard, A.E., and McMuller, T.A. (1983) Electromechanical Processes in the Cochlea. In: Mechanics of Hearing (Eds: de Boer, E. and Viergever, M.A.), Delft University Press, Delft, pp. 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mountain, D.C. (1985) Active filtering by hair cells. In: Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms (Eds: Allen, J.B., Hall, J.L., Hubbard, A., Neely, S.T., and Tubis, A.), pp. 179–188.Google Scholar
  22. Mountain, D.C. (1986) Electromechanical Properties of Hair Cells. In: Neurobiology of Hearing. The Cochlea (Eds: Altschuler, R.A., Bobbins, R.P. and Hoffman, D.W.), Raven Press, New York, pp. 77–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. K. Yates
    • 1
  • C. D. Geisler
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. B. Patuzzi
    • 1
  • B. M. Johnstone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia
  2. 2.Departments of Neurophysiology and of Electrical & Computer EngineeringUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations