Advertisement

Gender Stereotypes

A New Egalitarian Couple Emerges
  • Gwendolyn L. Gerber

Abstract

One of the fundamental beliefs about women and men is that they have different personality characteristics. This belief has persisted to the present day, despite major changes in social conditions, family structures, and occupational roles (Neufeld, Langmeyer, & Seeman, 1974; Ruble, 1983; Werner & LaRussa, 1985). When people are asked to describe the personality traits that are typical of the two sexes, women are characterized as being sympathetic, compassionate, and sensitive to the needs of others, while men are depicted as being assertive, independent, and dominant (Bem, 1974; Rosenkrantz, Vogel, Bee, Broverman, & Broverman, 1968; Spence, Helmreich, & Stapp, 1975).

Keywords

Personality Trait Gender Identity Gender Stereotype Physical Attractiveness Positivity Balance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, S. M., and Bem, S. L. (1981). Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 74–86.Google Scholar
  2. Anti11, J. K. (1983). Sex role complementarity versus similarity in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  4. Bales, R. F. (1967). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, and R. F. Bales (Eds.), Small groups: Studies in social interaction (pp. 444–476 ). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  5. Bass, B. M. (1973). Leadership, psychology, and organizational behavior. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bernard, J. (1972). The future of marriage. New York: World Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Block, J. (1973). Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 28, 512–526.Google Scholar
  10. Blood, R. O., and Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brigham, J. (1971). Ethnic stereotypes. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, E E., Rosenkrantz, P. S., and Vogel, S. R. (1970). Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burgess, E. W., and Locke, H. J. (1960). The family: From institution to companionship ( 2nd ed. ). New York: American Book Company.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, D. T. (1967). Stereotypes and the perception of group differences. American Psychologist, 22, 817–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to the famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Costos, D. (1986). Sex role identity in young adults: Its parental antecedents and relation to ego development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 602–611.Google Scholar
  17. Costrich, N., Feinstein, J., Kidder, L., Maracek, J., and Pascale, L. (1975). When stereotypes hurt: Three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 520–530.Google Scholar
  18. Darley, J. M., and Fazio, R. H. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35, 867–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deaux, K. (1977). Sex differences. In T. Blass (Ed.), Personality variables in social behavior (pp. 357–377 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Denmark, F. L. (1977). Styles of leadership. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eagly, A. H., and Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Falbo, T., Hazen, M. D., and Linimon, D. (1982). The costs of selecting power bases or messages associated with the opposite sex. Sex Roles, 8, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  24. Foushee, H. C., Helmreich, R. L., and Spence, J. T. (1979). Implicit theories of masculinity and femininity: Dualistic or bipolar? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 3, 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frable, D. E. S., and Bem, S. L. (1985). If you are gender schematic, all members of the opposite sex look alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. French, J. R. P., Jr., and Raven, B. (1968). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory ( 3rd ed., pp. 259–269 ). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  27. Gerber, G. L. (1985). A relationship balance model for sex-role stereotypic traits: Attributions to married couples ( Summary ). Proceedings and Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, 56, 14.Google Scholar
  28. Gerber, G. L. (1986a, April). Gender and police partners: A model for describing relationships. In R. Pecorella (Chair), Integrating the public service: Changing roles and gender. Panel conducted at the 40th Annual Conference of the New York State Political Science Association, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  29. Gerber, G. L. (1986b). The relationship balance model and its implications for individual and couples therapy. In D. Howard (Ed.),The dynamics of feminist therapy (pp. 19–27 ). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gerber, G. L. (1987). Sex stereotypes among American college students: Implications for marital happiness, social desirability, and marital power. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 113, 413–431.Google Scholar
  31. Gerber, G. L. (1988a). Leadership roles and the gender stereotype traits. Sex Roles, 18, 649–668. Gerber, G. L. ( 1988b ). The leadership balance in traditional and nontraditional male female dyads. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  32. Gerber, G. L. (1988c). The more positive evaluation of men than women on the gender stereotype traits. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  33. Gerber, G. L. (1988d). Social desirability of married couples and their relationships: Effect of leadership roles on physical attractiveness, gender identity, self-esteem and status. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  34. Gillen, B. (1981). Physical attractiveness: A determinant of two types of goodness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 277–281.Google Scholar
  35. Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Gray-Little, B., and Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513–538.Google Scholar
  36. Harvey, O. J. (1953). An experimental approach to the study of status relations in informal groups. American Sociological Review, 18, 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hatfield, E., and Sprecher, S. (1986). Mirror, mirror… The importance of looks in everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hefner, R., Rebecca, M., and Oleshansky, B. (1975). The development of sex-role transcendence. Human Development, 18, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heilman, M. E., and Saruwatari, L. R. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360–372.Google Scholar
  40. Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Hicks, M. W., and Platt, M. (1970). Marital happiness and stability: A review of the research in the sixties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 533–574.Google Scholar
  42. Holyoak, K. J., and Gordon, P. C. (1984). Information processing and social cognition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., and T. K. Skrull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 39–70 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Ickes, W. (1985). Sex-role influences on compatibility in relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 187–208 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ickes, W, and Barnes, R. D. (1978). Boys and girls together-and alienated: On enacting stereotyped sex roles in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 669–683.Google Scholar
  45. Jones, R. A. (1982). Perceiving other people: Stereotyping as a process of social cognition. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder: Contemporary issues in stereotyping (pp. 41–91 ). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  46. Lippitt, R., Polansky, N., Redl, R., and Rosen, S. (1952). The dynamics of power. Human Relations, 5, 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Major, B. (1981). Gender patterns in touching behavior. In C. Mayo and N. Henley (Eds.), Gender, androgyny, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 15–37 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Major, B., Carnevale, P. J. D., and Deaux, K. (1981). A differential perspective on androgyny: Evaluations of masculine and feminine personality characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 988–1001.Google Scholar
  50. McKee, J. P., and Sherriffs, A. C. (1957). The differential evaluation of males and females. Journal of Personality, 25, 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Megargee, E. I. (1969). Influence of sex roles on the manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Michel, A. (1967). Comparative data concerning the interaction in French and American families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 277–244.Google Scholar
  53. Neufeld, E., Langmeyer, D., and Seeman, W. (1974). Some sex-role stereotypes and personal preferences, 1950 and 1970. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nyquist, L. V., and Spence, J. T. (1986). Effects of dispositional dominance and sex role expectations on leadership behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pedhazur, E. J., and Tetenbaum, T. J. (1979). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016.Google Scholar
  56. Peplau, L. A., and Gordon, S. L. (1985). Women and men in love: Gender differences in close heterosexual relationships. In V. E. O’Leary, R. K. Unger, and B. S. Wallson (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology (pp. 257–292 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  57. Fleck, J. (1975). Masculinity-femininity: Current and alternative paradigms. Sex Roles, 1, 161–178. Pond, D. A., Ryle, A., and Hamilton, M. (1963). Marriage and neurosis in a working-class population. British Journal of Psychiatry, 109, 592–598.Google Scholar
  58. Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., and Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 283–294. Ruble, T. L. (1983). Sex stereotypes: Issues of change in the 1970s. Sex Roles, 9, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Skrypnek, B. J., and Snyder, M. (1982). On the self-perpetuating nature of stereotypes about women and men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spence, J. T., Deaux, K., and Helmreich, R. L. (1985). Sex roles in contemporary American society. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2. Special fields and applications ( 3rd ed., pp. 149–178 ). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  61. Spence, J. T, Heimreich, R. L., and Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Spence, J. T., and Sawin, L. L. (1985). Images of masculinity and femininity: A reconceptualization. In V. E. O’Leary, R. K. Unger, and B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology (pp. 35–66 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  63. Stogdill, R. M. (1950). Leadership, membership and organization. Psychological Bulletin, 47, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thibaut, J. W., and Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley. Unger, R. K., Hilderbrand, M., and Madar, T. (1982). Physical attractiveness and assumptions about social deviance: Some sex-by-sex comparisons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 293–301.Google Scholar
  65. von Baeyer, C. L., Sherk, D. L., and Zanna, M. P. (1981). Impression management in the job interview: When the female applicant meets the male (chauvinist) interviewer. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 45–51.Google Scholar
  66. Werner, P. D., and LaRussa, G. W. (1985). Persistence and change in sex-role stereotypes. Sex Roles, 12, 1089–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. White, K. M., Speisman, J. C., Jackson, D., Bartis, S., and Costos, D. (1986). Intimacy maturity and its correlates in young married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 152–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1983). Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–778.Google Scholar
  69. Zanna, M. R, and Pack, S. J. (1975). On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex differences in behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 583–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gwendolyn L. Gerber
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal JusticeThe City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations