Abatement of Air Pollution in Oslo

  • D. H. Trønnes
Part of the NATO · Challenges of Modern Society book series (NATS, volume 12)


Some air pollution components in Oslo exceed the air quality guidelines proposed by the Norwegian State Pollution Control Authority (SFT, 1982). The situation is particularly adverse during the winter time on cold days with inversion and little wind. The incidence of lung diseases is considerably higher in Oslo than in other parts of Norway. The lung cancer incidence is 1.8 times higher in Oslo than in the rest of Norway (Aune, 1982), and air pollution is probably contributing to this together with variations in occupational exposure, smoking habits, diet, and other life style factors. The air pollution may also cause other health effects (Aune, 1982), and a survey has shown that about half of the population in Oslo feel afflicted by dust and unpleasant odours (Norsk Opinionsinstitutt, 1986). Prognoses for the situation towards the year 2000 show an aggravation with respect to some pollution components caused by an expected increase in road traffic and energy consumption, if no further actions are taken to reduce emissions. The already approved decision to require catalytic purification of exhaust in all new cars from 1989, however, will help to improve the situation for nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbons.


Sulphur Content Suspended Particulate Matter Road Traffic Exposure Assessment Space Heating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anadalingam, G., 1987, A multiple criteria decision analytic approach for evaluating acid rain policy choices, European Journal of Operations Research, pp. 336–352.Google Scholar
  2. Aune, T.,1982, “Health Effects from Air Pollution in Oslo,” (in Norwegian), SFT-report no. 41, The Norwegian State Pollution Control Authority, Oslo.Google Scholar
  3. Keeney, R.L., and Raiffa, H.F., 1976, “Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs,” John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Merkhofer, M.W., and Keeney, R.L., 1987, A multiattribute utility analysis of alternative sites for the disposal of nuclear waste, Risk Analysis, 7 (2): 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Norsk Opinionsinstitutt, 1986, “Inquiry about Air Pollution Nuisance in Oslo,” Norsk Opinionsinstitutt, Oslo.Google Scholar
  6. Overrein, L.N., Seip, H.M., and Tollan, A., 1980, “Acid Precipitation — Effects on Forest and Fish,” Final report of the SNSF-project 1972–1980, NIVA, Oslo.Google Scholar
  7. Grønskei, K.E., Gram, F., and Larssen, S., 1982, “Calculation of Dispersion and Exposure for Some Air Pollution Components in Oslo,” (in Norwegian), NILU/OR 8/82, The Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Lillestrøm.Google Scholar
  8. SFT, 1985, “Further Reduction of Air Pollution in Oslo,” (in Norwegian), The Norwegian State Pollution Control Authority, Oslo.Google Scholar
  9. SFT, 1982, “Air Pollution: Health and Environmental Effects,” (in Norwegian), SFT-report no. 38, The Norwegian State Pollution Control Authority, Oslo.Google Scholar
  10. Syversen, T., 1987, “Comparing the Utility of Various Impacts of Measures to Reduce Air Pollution,” (in Norwegian), The Norwegian State Pollution Control Authority, Oslo.Google Scholar
  11. Trønnes, D.H., Heiberg, A.B., and Seip, H.M., 1986, Decision making in pollution control, in: “Risk and Reason: Risk Assessment in Relation to Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens,” pp. 127–140, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. H. Trønnes
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Industrial ResearchOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations